Skip to main content
Log in

A stability analysis of time to flowering as a screen for responsiveness to temperature and photoperiod in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Twenty-one genotypes of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), comprising landraces and varieties, were grown in 22 photothermal environments in Nigeria and Niger, West Africa, and a stability analysis of days from sowing to flowering (f) was carried out. Cowpeas are rarely insensitive to photoperiod; they are typically quantitative shortday plants wherein f is delayed when photoperiod (P) is longer than the critical photoperiod (P c ). Therefore, in order to quantify genotypic variation in temperature sensitivity, genotype f was regressed against the mean trial f in circumstances where P<P c (i.e. approximately ≤ 13 hd-1) and mean temperature (T) was between 19° and 28° C. Correspondingly, in order to assess genotypic variation in photoperiod sensitivity, trials where T was near optimal (25°–28° C) but where P ranged from 10–14.5 hd-1 were used. These stability analyses detected no significant differences (P>0.05) between genotypes 9n temperature sensitivity but revealed significant differences (P<0.001) in photoperiod sensitivity. Regression coefficients from the stability analysis were strongly correlated (r=0.94, 19df) with a photoperiod sensitivity constant, c′, determined from a photothermal flowering model. A stability analysis of f from field trials can therefore identify and quantify genotypic variation in response to temperature and photoperiod in cowpea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

f :

days from sowing to flowering

P:

mean photoperiod

P c :

critical photoperiod

P ce :

ceiling photoperiod

T:

mean temperature

T b :

base temperature

T o :

optimum temperature

SDP:

short-day plant

References

  • Craufurd, P.Q., A. Qi, R.H. Ellis, R.J. Summerfield & E.H. Roberts, 1996a. Development in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). II. Effect of temperature and saturation deficit on time to flowering in photoperiod-insensitive genotypes. Expl. Agric. 32:.

  • Craufurd, P.Q., A. Qi, R.J. Summerfield, R.H. Ellis & E.H. Roberts, 1996b. Development in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). III. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on time to flowering in photoperiod-sensitive genotypes and screening for photothermal responses. Expl. Agric. 32:.

  • Curtis, D.L., 1968. The relationship between date of heading of Nigerian sorghums and the duration of the growing season. J. Appl. Ecol. 5: 215–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingkuhn, M., 1995. Climatic determinants of irrigated rice performance in the Sahel. III. Characterising environments by simulating crop phenology. Agric. Syst. 48: 435–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingkuhn, M. & K.M. Miezan, 1995. Climatic determinants or irrigated rice performance in the Sahel. II. Validation of photothermal constants and characterization of genotypes. Agric. Syst. 48: 411–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingkuhn, M., A. Sow, A. Samb, S. Diack & F. Asch, 1995. Climatic determinants of irrigated rice performance in the Sahel. I. Photothermal and micro-climatic responses of flowering. Agric. Syst. 48: 385–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow el-Madina, I.M. & A.E. Hall, 1986. Flowering of contrasting cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) genotypes under different temperatures and photoperiods. Field Crops Res. 14: 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erskine, W., A. Hussain, M. Tahir, A. Baksh, R.H. Ellis, R.J. Summerfield & E.H. Roberts, 1994. Field evaluation of a model of photothermal flowering responses in a world lentil collection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88: 423–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, K.W. & G.N. Wilkinson, 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14: 745–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genstat V Committee, 1987. Genstat 5 Reference Manual. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, P., E.H. Roberts, R.J. Summerfield & F.R. Minchin, 1983. A quantitative model of reproductive development in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) in relation to photoperiod and temperature and implications for screening germplasm. Ann. Bot. 51: 531–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowal, J.M. & D.T. Knabe, 1972. An Agroclimatological Atlas of the Northern States of Nigeria. Ahmadu Bello University Press, Zaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawn, R.J. & B.C. Imrie, 1991. Crop improvement for tropical and sub-tropical Australia: designing plants for difficult climates. Field Crops Res. 26: 113–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawn, R.J., R.J. Summerfield, R.H. Ellis, A. Qi, E.H. Roberts, P.M. Chay, J.B. Brouwer, J.L. Rose & S.J. Yeates, 1995. Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. VI. Applications in crop improvement. Expl. Agric. 31: 89–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, M.M. & R.C. Muchow, 1990. A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Adv. Agron. 43: 107–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers, J.D., R.J. Lawn & D.E. Byth, 1991a. Adaptation of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) to the dry season of the tropics. I. Genotypic and environmental effects on phenology. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 42: 497–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers, J.D., R.J. Lawn & D.E. Byth, 1991b. Agronomic studies on soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merril) in the dry seasons of the tropics. I. Limits to yield imposed by phenology. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 42: 1075–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchow, R.C. & P.S. Carberry, 1993. Designing improved plant types for the semi-arid tropics: agronomists' viewpoints. In: F.W.T. Penning de Vries, P. Teng & K. Metselaar (Eds). Systems Approaches for Agricultural Development, pp. 37–61. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E.H. & R.J. Summerfield, 1987. Measurement and prediction of flowering in annual crops. In: J.G. Atherton (Ed). Manipulation of Flowering, pp. 17–50. Butterworths, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorter, R., R.J. Lawn & G.L. Hammer, 1991. Improving genotypic adaptation in crops — a role for breeders, physiologists and modellers. Expl. Agric. 27: 155–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerfield, R.J., R.J. Lawn, A. Qi, R.H. Ellis, E.H. Roberts, P.M. Chay, J.B. Brouwer, J.L. Rose, S. Shanmugasundaram, S.J. Yeates & S. Sandover, 1993. Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. II. Soyabean (Glycine max). Expl. Agric. 29: 253–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, D.H., 1985. Physiological genetics of plant maturity, adaptation and yield. Plant Breed. Rev. 3: 21–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkinson, A.R., R.J. Lawn, R.H. Ellis, A. Qi & R.J. Summerfield, 1974. RoDMod: A Computer Program for Characterising Genotypic Variation in Flowering Responses to Photoperiod and Temperature, p. 49. CSIRO, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wien, H.C. & R.J. Summerfield, 1980. Adaptation of cowpeas in West Africa: effects of photoperiod and temperature responses in cultivars of diverse origin. In: R.J. Summerfield & A.H. Bunting (Eds). Advances in Legume Science, pp. 405–417. HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wienk, J.F., 1963. Photoperiod effects in Vigna unguiculata (L.). Walp. Meded. Land. Wageningen 63: 1–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Craufurd, P.Q., Roberts, E.H., Ellis, R.H. et al. A stability analysis of time to flowering as a screen for responsiveness to temperature and photoperiod in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Euphytica 88, 77–84 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029268

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029268

Key words

Navigation