Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 17–23 | Cite as

The progamic phase in Cichorium intybus L. Pollen tube growth in the style, incompatibility reaction and gametophytic competition

  • G. Coppens d'Eeckenbrugge
Article
  • 55 Downloads

Summary

Pollen germination and tube growth were studied following compatible, incompatible and pseudo-compatible pollinations in chicory. Pollen germination begins 3 minutes after compatible pollinations. The earliest pollen tubes reach the ovary 17 minutes later. Many of the later germinating pollen tubes are arrested and burst at the stigma papillae. In the transmitting tissue inhibitional effects due to negative interactions between pollen tubes are frequently observed. Complete self-incompatibility results in total inhibition of germination. In case of pseudo-self-compatibility, some pollen germinate but germination and stigma penetration are delayed and often result in pollen bursting. There is no self-incompatibility reaction in the transmitting tract but if the pollen tubes reaching this tissue are relatively numerous, negative interactions between them occur as after compatible pollinations. An hypothesis is presented which attributes the negative interactions between pollen tubes to the diffusion of a substance from the growing pollen tubes. This substance would also provoke pollen bursting on the stigma.

Key words

Cichorium intybus incompatibility pollen germination pollen tube growth gametophytic competition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dionne, L.A. & P.B. Spicer, 1958. Staining germinating pollen and pollen tubes. Stain Tech. 33: 15–17.Google Scholar
  2. Eenink, A.H., 1981. Compatibility and incompatibility in witloof-chicory (Cichorium intybus L.). 1. The influence of temperature and plant age on pollen germination and seed production. Euphytica 30: 71–76.Google Scholar
  3. Gerstel, D.U. & M.E. Riner, 1950. Self-incompatibility studies in Guayule. I. Pollen tube behavior. J. Hered. 41: 49–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Howlett, B.J., R.B. Knox & J.D. Paxton, 1975. Pollen-wall proteins physico-chemical characterization and role in self-incompatibility in Cosmos bipinnatus. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 188: 167–182.Google Scholar
  5. Knox, R.B., 1973. Pollen-stigma interactions in Ragweed and Cosmos (Compositae). J. Cell Sci., 12: 421–443.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mulcahy, D.L., 1974. Adaptative significance of gametic competition. In: H.F. Linskens (Ed.). Fertilization in higher plants, pp. 27–30. North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  7. Vithanage, H.I.M.V. & R.B. Knox, 1977. Development and cytochemistry of stigma surface and response to self- and foreign pollination in Helianthus annuus. Phytomorphology, 27: 168–179.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Coppens d'Eeckenbrugge
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Phytotechnie Tropicale et SubtropicaleLouvain-la NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations