Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Factors influencing Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression of gusA in rice

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transient expression of GUS in rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens was characterized using binary vectors containing gusA genes that express minimal (pKIWI105 and pCNL1) or no (p35S-GUS-INT and pCNL56) GUS activity in bacteria. Four-day old seedlings obtained from seeds or immature embryos of rice were cut into shoot, root, and seed remnants and inoculated with various strains of A. tumefaciens. Transient GUS expression events were quantitated histochemically by determining the frequency of explants exhibiting blue spots indicative of GUS at four to six days after cocultivation with A. tumefaciens. A. tumefaciens strains that did not contain the gusA gene (At643) or a Ti-plasmid (At563 and At657) did not elicit any blue staining characteristic of GUS activity.

Several parameters were important in obtaining efficient transient expression of GUS in rice mediated by A. tumefaciens. The growth regulator 2,4-D inhibited GUS expression if present during the seed germination period, but the presence of 6 mg/1 2,4-D during cocultivation of the explants with A. tumefaciens slightly enhanced GUS expression efficiency. All 21 rice cultivars tested expressed GUS after co-cultivation with A. tumefaciens. The GUS expression frequency was highest amongst the indica cultivars. The frequencies of GUS expression in japonica cultivars and in Oryza glaberrima cultivars (grown primarily in Africa) were generally one-half to one-third the level found for indica varieties. Leaf explants were more susceptible to A. tumefaciens-facilitated GUS expression than were roots or seed remnants. The vir genes of an agropine-type Ti-plasmid of A. tumefaciens were most effective in directing transient GUS expression in rice, whereas those of a nopaline-type and an octopine-type plasmid were less effective. We have also found that the frequency of transient expression of GUS was higher with pBIN19 as the precursor cloning vector than with pEND4K as the precursor cloning vector. Reasons for differences in effectiveness of these binary vectors are discussed. Using the conditions described here, A. tumefaciens-mediated frequencies of transient GUS expression in four-day old shoots of several rice cultivars were routinely in excess of 50%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bevan M: Binary Agrobacterium vectors for plant transformation. Nucl Acids Res 12: 8711–8721 (1984).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boulton MI, Buchholz WG, Marks MS, Markham PG, Davies JW: Specificity of Agrobacterium-mediated delivery of maize streak virus DNA to members of the Gramineae. Plant Mol Biol 12: 31–40 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bytebier B, Deboeck F, DeGreve H, VanMontagu M, Hernalsteens J.-P: T-DNA organization in tumor cultures and transgenic plants of the monocotyledon Asparagus officinalis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 5345–5349 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chilton MD, Currier TC, Farrand SK, Bendich AJ, Gordon MP, Nester EW: Agrobacterium tumefaciens DNA and PS8 bacteriophage DNA not detected in crown gall tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71: 3672–3676 (1974).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Christou P, Ford TL, Kofron M: Production of transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants from agronomically important indica and japonica varieties via electric discharge particle acceleration of exogenous DNA into immature zygotic embryos. Bio/technology 9: 957–962 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chu CC, Wang CC, Sun CS, Hsu C, Yin KC, Chu CY, Bin FY: Establishment of an efficient medium for anther culture of rice through comparative experiments on nitrogen sources. Scient Sin 18: 659–668 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deblare R, Bytebier B, DeGreve H, Deboeck F, Schell J, VanMontagu M, Leemans J: Efficient octopine Ti-plasmid-derived vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer to plants. Nucl Acids Res 13: 4777–4788 (1985).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DeCleene M, DeLey G: The host range of crown gall. Bot Rev 42: 389–466 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Depicker A, Stachel S, Dhaese P, Zambryski P, Goodman HM: Nopaline synthase: Transcript mapping and DNA sequence. J Mol Appl Genet 1: 561–573 (1982).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ditta G, Stanfield S, Corbin D, Helinski DR: Broad host range DNA cloning system for Gram-negative bacteria: construction of a gene bank of Rhizobium meliloti. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77: 7347–7351 (1980).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garfinkel DJ, Simpson RB, Ream LW, White FF, Gordon MP, Nester EW: Genetic analysis of Crown gall: fine structure map of the T-DNA by site-directed mutagenesis. Cell 27: 143–153 (1981).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gordon-Kamm WJ, Spencer TM, Mangano ML, Adams TR, Daines RJ, Start WG, O'Brien JV, Chambers SA, Adams WR, Willetts NG, Rice TB, Mackey CJ, Krueger RW, Kausch AP, Lemaux PG: Transformation of maize cells and regeneration of fertile transgenic plants. Plant Cell 2: 603–618 (1990).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gould J, Devey M, Hasegawa O, Ulian EC, Peterson G, Smith RH: Transformation of Zea mays L. using Agrobacterium tumefaciens and the shoot apex. Plant Physiol 95: 426–434 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hodges TK, Peng JY, Lee L, Koetje DS: In vitro culture of rice: transformation and regeneration of protoplasts. In: Gustafson P (ed.) Gene Manipulation in Plant Improvement II, pp. 163–183. Plenum Press, New York (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hodges TK, Peng JY, Lyznik LA, Koetje DS: Transformation and regeneration of rice protoplasts. In: Kush GS, Toenniessen GH (eds) Rice Biotechnology, pp. 157–174. C.A.B International, Wallingford, UK (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hood EE, Fraley RT, Chilton MD: Virulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain A281 on legumes. Plant Physiol 83: 529–534 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hood EE, Helmer GL, Fraley RT, Chilton MD: The hypervirulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens A281 is encoded in a region of pTiBo542 outside of T-DNA. J Bact 168: 1291–1301 (1986).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hooykaas PJJ: Transformation of plant cells via Agrobacterium. Plant Mol Biol 13: 327–336 (1989).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Janssen BJ, Gardner RC: Localized transient expression of GUS in leaf discs following cocultivation with Agrobacterium. Plant Mol Biol 14: 61–72 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jarchow E, Grimsley NH, Hohn B: virF, the host-range-determining virulence gene of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, affects T-DNA transfer to Zea mays. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 10426–10430 (1991).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jefferson RA: Assaying chimeric genes in plants: The GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol Biol Rep 5: 387–405 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jen GC, Chilton MD: The right border region of pTiT37 T-DNA is intrinsically more active than the left border region in promoting T-DNA transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 3895–3899 (1986).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jin S, Komari T, Gordon MP, Nester EW: Genes responsible for the supervirulence phenotype of Agrobacterium tumefaciens A281. J Bact 169: 4417–4425 (1987).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Klee HS, Yanofsky MF, Nester EW: Vectors for transformation of higher plants. Bio/technology 3: 637–642 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Komari T: Transformation of cultured cells of Chenopodium quinoa by binary vectors that carry a fragment of DNA from the virulence region of pTiBo542. Plant Cell Rep 9: 303–306 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marks MS, Kemp JM, Woolston CJ, Dale PJ: Agroinfection of wheat: a comparison of Agrobacterium strains. Plant Sci 63: 247–256 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mooney PA, Goodwin PB, Dennis ES, Llewellyn DJ: Agrobacterium tumefaciens-gene transfer into wheat tissues. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 25: 209–218 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Peralta EG, Hellmiss R, Ream W: Overdrive, a T-DNA transmission enhancer on the A. tumefaciens tumour-inducing plasmid. EMBO J 5: 1137–1142 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Raineri DM, Bottino P, Gordon MP, Nester EW: Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Bio/technology 8: 33–38 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schafer W, Gorz A, Kahl G: T-DNA integration and expression in monocot crop plant after induction of Agrobacterium. Nature 327: 529–532 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sciaky D, Montoya AL, Chilton MD: Fingerprints of Agrobacterium Ti-plasmids. Plasmid 1: 238–253 (1978).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Toro N, Datta A, Carmi OA, Young C, Prusti RK, Nester EW: The Agrobacterium tumefaciens virC1 gene product binds to overdrive, a T-DNA transfer enhancer. J Bact 171: 6845–6849 (1989).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vancanneyt G, Schmidt R, O'Connor-Sanchez A, Willmitzer L, Rocha-Sosa M: Construction of an introncontaining marker gene: Splicing of the intron in transgenic plants and its use in monitoring early events in Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Mol Gen Genet 220: 245–250 (1990).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. VanLarebeke N, Engler G, Holstters M, Van denElsacker S, Zaenen I, Schilperoort RA, Schell J: Large plasmid in Agrobacterium tumefaciens essential for crown gall-inducing ability. Nature 252: 169–170 (1974).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Veluthambi K, Ream W, Gelvin SB: Virulence genes, borders and overdrive generate single-stranded T-DNA molecules from the A6 Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bact 170: 1523–1532 (1988).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang K, Genetello C, VanMontagu M, Zambryski PC: Sequence context of the T-DNA border repeat element determines its relative activity during T-DNA transfer to plant cells. Mol Gen Genet 210: 338–346 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Watson B, Currier TC, Gordon MP, Chilton MD, Nester EW: Plasmid required for virulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bact 123: 255–264 (1975).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, 47907, West Lafayette, IN, USA

    Xiu-Qing Li, Steven W. Ritchie, Jian-ying Peng & Thomas K. Hodges

  2. Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, 47907, West Lafayette, IN, USA

    Chang-Nong Liu & Stanton B. Gelvin

Authors
  1. Xiu-Qing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chang-Nong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Steven W. Ritchie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jian-ying Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stanton B. Gelvin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Thomas K. Hodges
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, XQ., Liu, CN., Ritchie, S.W. et al. Factors influencing Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression of gusA in rice. Plant Mol Biol 20, 1037–1048 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028891

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028891

Key words

Search

Navigation