Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Differences between spring wheat cultivars in early growth

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Twelve spring wheat cultivars were grown as isolated plants in the field and their pre-anthesis growth was interpreted in terms of plant growth analysis. Relative growth rate (RGR) decreased steadily with time due to a decline of leaf area per unit plant weight (LAR), which could be explained by the reduction of the portion of leaf weight in total plant weight (LWR). Growth per unit leaf area (NAR) and leaf area per unit leaf weight (SLA) changed only little with time.

Differences between cultivars for NAR and LAR were of similar magnitude: both 8% when measured by the genetic coefficient of variation. Because both quantities were negatively correlated, the genetic variation of RGR was only 5%. Genetic variation for LWR and SLA were also of similar size, both about 4%. Estimates of genetic variances and covariances based on cultivar means appeared to be biased strongly when the error variation of the means was neglected.

Special attention is paid to the methodology of plant growth analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apel, P. & C. O., Lehmann, 1969. Variabilität und Sortenspezifität der Photosyntheserate bei Sommergerste. Photosynthetica 3: 255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asay, K. H., C. J., Nelson & G. L., Horst, 1974. Genetic variability for net photosynthesis in tall fescue. Crop Sci. 14: 571–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, R. B., C. L., Morgan, M. A., Ford & S. G., Bhagwat, 1982. Flag leaf photosynthesis of Triticum aestivum and related diploid and tetraploid species. Ann. Bot. 49: 177–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkman, O., 1981. Responses to different quantum flux densities. Encyclopedia of plant physiology, New Series 12A: 57–107. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdon, J. J. & J. L., Harper, 1980. Relative growth rates of individual members of a plant population. J. Ecol. 68: 953–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Causton, D. R. & J. C., Venus, 1981. The biometry of plant growth. Edward Arnold, London, 307 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Criswell, J. G. & R. M., Shibles, 1971. Physiological basis for genotypic variation in net photosynthesis of oat leaves. Crop Sci. 11: 550–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantuma, G., 1973. Rates of photosynthesis in leaves of wheat and barley varieties. Neth. J. agric. Sci. 21: 188–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobben, W. H.van, 1966. Systems of management of cereals for improved yield and quality. In F. L., Milthorpe & J. D., Ivins (Eds), The growth of cereals and grasses. Butterworths, London, pp. 320–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, W. G. & J. D., Hesketh, 1968. Net photosynthetic rates, relative leaf growth rates, and leaf numbers of 22 races of maize grown at eight temperatures. Crop Sci. 8: 670–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehleringer, J. & R. W., Pearcy, 1983. Variation in quantum yield for CO2 uptake among C3 and C4 plants. Plant Physiol. 73: 555–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, C. O. & M. J., Chadwick, 1979. Growth characteristics of grass and legume cultivars and their potential for land reclamation. J. appl. Ecol. 16: 537–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L. T. & R. L., Dunstone, 1970. Some physiological aspects of evolution in wheat. Austr. J. biol. Sci. 23: 725–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L. T., R. M., Visperas & B. S., Vergara, 1984. Morphological and physiological changes among rice varieties used in the Philippines over the last seventy years. Field Crops Res. 8: 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R. A., F., Bidinger, J. R., Syme & P. C., Wall, 1981. Leaf photosynthesis, leaf permeability, crop growth, and yield of short spring wheat genotypes under irrigation. Crop Sci. 21: 367–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerwen, C. P. van, C. J. T. Spitters & G. M. J. Mohren, 1986. Simulation of competition for light in even-aged stands of Douglas fir. Submitted to For. Ecol. Manage.

  • Gifford, R. M. & C. L. D., Jenkins, 1982. Prospects of applying knowledge of photosynthesis toward improving crop production. In: Govindjee (Ed.), Photosynthesis: development, carbon metabolism, and plant productivity, Vol. II. Academic Press, New York, p. 419–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudriaan, J., 1982. Potential production processes. In: F. W. T., Penning de Vries & H. H.van, Laar (Eds), Simulation of plant growth and crop production, pp. 98–113. Simulation Monograph, Wageningen, Pudoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, R., 1982. Plant growth curves. Edward Arnold, London, 248 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, R. & G. C., Evans, 1980. Classical data on the growth of maize: curve fitting with statistical analysis. New Phytol. 86: 155–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, R. & I. T., Parsons, 1977. Plant growth analysis: further applications of a recent curve-fitting program. J. appl. Ecol. 14: 965–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishitani, S. & S., Tsunoda, 1974. Effect of low and high temperature pretreatment on leaf photosynthesis and transpiration in cultivars of Oryza sativa. Photosynthetica 8: 161–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. A. & S., Tsunoda, 1970a. Leaf photosynthesis and transpiration under different levels of air flow rate and light intensity in cultivated wheat species and its wild relatives. Jap. J. Breeding 20: 305–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. A. & S., Tsunoda, 1970b. Growth analysis of six commercially cultivated wheats of West Pakistan with special reference to a semi-dwarf modern wheat variety, Mexi-Pak. Tohoku J. agric. Res. 21: 60–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. A. & S., Tsunoda, 1971. Comparative leaf anatomy of cultivated wheats and wild relatives with reference to their leaf photosynthetic rates. Jap. J. Breeding 21: 143–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranz, A. R., 1966. Stoffproduktion und Assimilationsleistung in der Evolution der Kulturpflanzen. II. Versuchsergebnisse und zusammenfassende Diskussion. Biol. Zentralblatt 85: 681–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdowall, F. D. H., 1974. Growth kinetics of Marquis wheat. VI. Genetic dependence and winter hardening. Can. J. Bot. 52: 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, J. D., 1983. Limitations to the use of physiological variability in plant breeding. Can. J. Plant Sci. 63: 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, R. B., G. E., Carlson, D. K., Barnes, R. H., Hart & C. H., Hanson, 1969. Specific leaf weight and photosynthesis in alfalfa. Crop Sci. 9: 423–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penning de Vries, F. W. T., A. H. M., Brunsting & H. H.van, Laar, 1974. Products, requirements and efficiency of biosynthesis: a quantitative approach. J. theor. Biol. 45: 339–337.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penning de Vries, F. W. T. & H. H.van, Laar, 1982. Simulation of growth processes and the model BACROS. In: F. W. T., Penning de Vries & H. H.van, Laar (Eds), Simulation of plant growth and crop production, pp. 114–135. Simulation Monograph, Wageningen: Pudoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, P. J., 1967. Growth analysis formulae — their use and abuse. Crop Sci. 7: 171–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson, H. M., J. H., Hindmarsh, R. A., Fischer & Y. M., Stockman, 1983. Changes in leaf photosynthesis with plant ontogeny and relationships with yield per ear in wheat cultivars and 120 progeny. Austr. J. Pl. Physiol. 10: 503–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibma, L., 1968. Growth of closed green crop surfaces in the Netherlands. Neth. J. agric. Sci. 16: 211–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibma, L., 1977. Maximization of arable crop yields in the Netherlands. Neth. J. agric. Sci. 25: 278–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitters, C. J. T., 1984a. Effects of intergenotypic competition on selection. In: W., Lange, A. C., Zeven & N. G., Hogenboom (Eds), Efficiency in plant breeding: Proc. 10th Congr. Europ. Ass. Res. Pl. Breed., EUCARPIA. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp. 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitters, C. J. T., 1984b. A simple simulation model for crop-weed competition. 7th Int. Symp. Weed Biology, Ecology and Systematics. COLUMA (Comité Français de Lutte contre les Mauvaises Herbes) — EWRS (European Weed Research Society), Paris, pp. 355–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitters, C. J. T. & Th., Kramer, 1985. Changes in relative growth rate with plant ontogeny in spring wheat genotypes grown as isolated plants. Euphytica 34: 833–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volenec, J. J., H. T., Nguyen, C. J., Nelson & D. A., Sleper, 1984. Potential for genetically modifying dark respiration of tall fescue leaves. Crop Sci. 24: 938–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D., 1975. Variation in leaf respiration in relation to growth and photosynthesis of Lolium. Ann. appl. Biol. 80: 323–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D., 1984. Development of better selection criteria. In: W., Lange, A. C., Zeven & N. G., Hoogenboom (Eds), Efficiency in plant breeding: Proc. 10th Congr. Europ. Ass. Res. Pl. Breed., EUCARPIA. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp. 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamauchi, M. & S., Yoshida, 1985. Heteroses in net photosynthetic rate, leaf area, tillering, and some physiological characters of 35 F1 rice hybrids. J. exp. Bot. 36: 274–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadoks, J. C., T. T., Chang & C. F., Konzak, 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Eucarpia Bull. 7: 42–52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. C. J. T. Spitters

    Present address: Foundation for Agricultural Plant Breeding, SVP, P.O. Box 117, NL-6700 AC, Wageningen, the Netherlands

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Theoretical Production Ecology, Agricultural University, P. O. Box 430, 6700 AK, Wageningen, the Netherlands

    C. J. T. Spitters

  2. Institute of Plant Breeding, Agricultural University, Wageningen, the Netherlands

    Th. Kramer

Authors
  1. C. J. T. Spitters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Th. Kramer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spitters, C.J.T., Kramer, T. Differences between spring wheat cultivars in early growth. Euphytica 35, 273–292 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028566

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028566

Index words

Search

Navigation