Summary
A series of experiments was carried out to investigate the effects of interplot competition on grain yield among hexaploid triticale cultivars of widely differing heights grown in 1.5 m wide plots. Three experiments in 1982 tested four triticale cultivars, ranging in final height from 63 to 104 cm, with four wheat standards, 62 to 82 cm in height, using a design balanced for nearest neighbours. Two further experiments in 1983 with the same design included eight triticale cultivars ranging in final height from 92 to 183 cm. In four of the five experiments, plot yields of both wheat and triticale were decreased by between one and two grammes per square metre for every centimetre by which the plot was exceeded by the mean height of its two neighbours. Plots which were taller than their neighbours showed a similar increase in yield. Such systematic biases in cultivar means are not reduced by randomisation and increased replication. Hence, in breeding trials, every effort should be made to group genotypes according to their final height so that competition effects between plots are reduced. For the final evaluation of varieties differing widely in height, where an estimate of error is required for variety comparisons and varietal differences are likely to be small, guard plots should be grown on either side of each experimental plot or harvesting should be restricted to the centre of larger plots.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austin, R. B. & R. D., Blackwell, 1980. Edge and neighbour effects in cereal yield trials. J. agric. Sci. 94: 371–374.
Austin, R. B., M. A. Ford & C. L. Morgan, 1985. In: Plant Breeding Institute Annual Report for 1984, Trumpington: 106–107.
Austin, R. B., M. A. Ford & C. L. Morgan, 1986. In: Plant Breeding Institute Annual Report for 1985, Trumpington (in press).
Bell, G. D., 1963. Breeding techniques. Barley genetics I. Pudoc, Wageningen, 285–306.
Fischer, R. A., 1979. Are your results confounded by intergenotypic competition? In: Proceedings of Vth International Wheat Genetics Symposium Vol 2, New Delhi: 767–777.
Ford, M. A., R. B., Austin, R. S., Gregory & C. L., Morgan, 1984. A comparison of the grain and biomass yields of winter wheat, rye and triticale. J. agric. Sci. 103: 395–403.
Hamblin, J. & C. M., Donald, 1974. The relationship between plant form, competitive ability and grain yield in a barley cross. Euphytica 23: 535–542.
Jensen, N. F. & W. T., Federer, 1964. Adjacent row competition in wheat. Crop Science 4: 641–645.
Kempton, R. A., 1982. Adjustment for competition between varieties in plant breeding trials. J. agric. Sci. 98: 599–611.
Kempton, R. A., 1984. The design and analysis of unreplicated field trials. In: Biometrics in plant breeding, Vortr. Pflanzenzüchtg, 7: 219–242.
Kempton, R. A. & G., Lockwood, 1984. Inter-plot competition in variety trials of field beans (Vicia faba L.). J. agric. Sci. 103: 293–302.
Kramer, Th., J. W.van, Ooijen & C. J. T., Spitters, 1982. Selection for yield in small plots of spring wheat. Euphytica 31: 549–564.
McGinnis, R. C. & L. H. Shebeski, 1968. The reliability of single plant selection for yield in F2. In: Proceed. Third Int. Wheat Genetics Symp., Canberra, 1968, 410–416.
Sneep, J., 1977. Selection for yield in early generations of self-fertilizing crops. Euphytica 26: 27–30.
Spencer, J. W., 1965. Calculation of solar position for building purposes. Technical paper 14, Division of Building Research, CSIRO, Melbourn.
Spitters, C. J. T., 1979. Competition and its consequences for selection in barley breeding. Agricultural Research Report 893, Wageningen pp. 268.
Tovey, D. A., K. T., Glaszion, R. H., Farquhar & T. A., Bull, 1973. Variability in radiation received by small plots of sugar cane due to differences in canopy heights. Crop Science 13: 240–242.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kempton, R.A., Gregory, R.S., Hughes, W.G. et al. The effect of interplot competition on yield assessment in triticale trials. Euphytica 35, 257–265 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028564
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028564