Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of moving mean covariance adjustments on error and genetic variance estimates and selection of superior lines in peanuts (Arachis hypogaeal L.)

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Effects of moving mean covariance adjustments on error control, genetic variance component estimates and selection were examined in nine trails in peanut breeding nurseries. Neighbourhood sizes of two to fourteen adjacent plots were used in two types of moving mean covariates: one based on adjacent plot yields and a second based on adjacent plot residuals after removal of replicate and treatment effects. Both covariate types reduced error variance, in one trial by up to 57%, although the covariate type giving the most error reduction varied among trials. Generally most error variance reduction occurred when six to eight adjacent plots were used.

In some trials genetic variance component estimates following covariance adjustment were higher than those from unadjusted analyses and in other trials they were lower. As the neighbourhood size included in the moving mean increased from two to fourteen plots the genetic variance component estimate changed considerably in some trials. However, large rank changes did not appear to be associated with these genetic variance component changes as neighbourhood size had little influence on the selection of progenies. Also, genetic effects included in the yield covariate had little influence on selection of elite lines as essentially the same lines were chosen or rejected when residual covariates lacking these genetic effects wre used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, R. J. & R. I. H., McKenzie, 1967. Use of control plots in yield trials. Crop Sci. 7: 335–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, M. S., 1938. The approximate recovery of information from field experiments with large blocks. J. Agric. Sci. 28: 418–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, M. S., 1978. Nearest neighbour models in the analysis of field experiments. J. R. Statist. Soc. B40: 147–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buker, R. J. & D. D., Alvey, 1979. Productivity covariance: an improved field plot analysis. Agron. Abstr., American Soc. Agron., Ft Collins, p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, H. T. & W. T., Williams, 1976. Similarity measures. pp. 37–46. In: W. T., Williams (Ed.), Pattern analysis in agricultural science. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, J., R., Knight & M. J., Atkinson, 1978. The influence of systematic micoenvironmental variation on individual plant yield within selection plots. Euphytica 27: 497–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, C. R., 1969. Design and analysis of animal husbandry experiments. pp 1–55. In: Techniques and procedures in animal production research. 2nd ed. American Soc. of Animal Production.

  • Johnston, R. P., 1981. Experimental technique and the control of microenvironmental variation. pp. 352–374. In: D. E., Byth & V. E., Mungomery (Eds), Interpretation of plant response and adaptation to agricultural environments. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci., Brisbane, Aust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempthorne, O. & L., Folks, 1971. Probability, statistics, and data analysis. Iowa State University Press, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, R. A. & C. W., Howes, 1981. The use of neighbouring plot values in the analysis of variety trials. Appl. Statist. 30: 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mak, C., B. L., Harvey & J. D., Berdahl, 1978. An evaluation of control plots and moving means for error control in barley nurseries. Crop Sci. 18: 870–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis, J. S. 1937. Méthode statistique pour des expériences sur champ. Bull. del'Inst. d'Amél. des Plantes à Salonique No. 23, 30 pp.

  • Rosielle, A. A., 1980. Comparison of lattice designs, check plots, and moving means in wheat breeding trials. Euphytica 29: 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorter, R. & R. J., Norman, 1983. Cultivar × environment interactions for kernel yield in Virginia type peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Queensland. Aust. J. agric. Res. 34: 415–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R. G. D. & J. H., Torrie, 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townley-Smith, T. F. & E. A., Hurd, 1973. Use of moving means in wheat yield trials. Can. J. Plant Sci. 53: 447–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G. N., S. R., Eckert, T. W., Hancock & O., Mayo, 1983. Nearest neighbour (NN) analysis of field experiments. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 45: 151–210.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shorter, R., Butler, D. Effect of moving mean covariance adjustments on error and genetic variance estimates and selection of superior lines in peanuts (Arachis hypogaeal L.). Euphytica 35, 185–192 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028556

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028556

Index words

Navigation