Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 279, Issue 1, pp 185–199 | Cite as

Use of lakes by black duck broods in relation to biological, chemical, and physical features

  • Cynthia A. Staicer
  • Bill Freedman
  • Diane Srivastava
  • Nancy Dowd
  • Jennifer Kilgar
  • Jill Hayden
  • Fred Payne
  • Tom Pollock
Article

Abstract

Characteristics of 32 freshwater lakes in central and western Nova Scotia were quantified to determine the relative influence of various biological, chemical, and physical factors on habitat selection by black ducks (Anas rubripes Brewster) during brood-rearing. Acidity and trophic status varied greatly among the waterbodies, of which 20 were used by black ducks for rearing their young. Duck brood density was positively related to lake trophic status. The highest brood densities occurred on hypertrophic waterbodies with a large anthropogenic input of nutrients.

Lakes with black duck broods had significantly higher concentrations of phosphorus and nitrogen, darker water with more dissolved organic carbon, and within the littoral zone, greater macrophyte cover, greater density and biomass of pelagic invertebrates, gentler slopes, and a softer, more organic substrate. Similar trends were observed within a subset of 17 acidic lakes (pH ≤ 5.5), 8 of which supported black ducks.

The density of black duck broods was significantly correlated with 17 of 20 variables, most notably total phosphorus (r= + 0.81). Partial correlation (removing the effect of total phosphorus) revealed that brood density was significantly correlated with the abundances of pelagic (r= + 0.77) and benthic (r= + 0.68) invertebrates, macrophyte cover (r= + 0.52), and substrate score (r= + 0.57), but not with other chemical variables, including pH.

Our results suggest that quality brood-rearing habitat is distinguished by a combination of factors, especially available nutrients, macrophyte cover, and invertebrates, subject to constraints imposed by physical characteristics of the littoral zone of the lake. The abundance of invertebrates, the primary food of young black ducks, emerged as the most important biological factor influencing the density of black duck broods.

Key words

waterfowl trophic status lake acidity littoral zone 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bartonek, J. C. & J. J. Hickey, 1969. Selective feeding by juvenile diving ducks in summer. Auk 86: 443–457.Google Scholar
  2. Bendell, B. E. & D. K. McNicol, 1987. Fish predation, lake acidity and the composition of aquatic insect assemblages. Hydrobiologia 150: 193–202.Google Scholar
  3. Blancher, P. J. & D. G. McAuley, 1987. Influence of wetland acidity on avian breeding success. Trans. n. am. Wildl. nat. Res. Conf. 52: 628–635.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, P. G. C. & P. M. Stokes, 1985. Acidification and toxicity of metals to aquatic biota. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 42: 2034–2049.Google Scholar
  5. CPCGN, 1977. Gazetteer of Canada. Nova Scotia. Canadian Permanent Committee on Geographical Names. Energy, Mines, and Resources, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  6. DesGranges, J. -L. & M. Darveau, 1985. Effect of lake acidity and morphometry on the distribution of aquatic birds in southern Quebec. Holarct. Ecol. 8: 181–190.Google Scholar
  7. DesGranges, J. -L. & B. Houde, 1989. Effects of acidity and other environmental parameters on the distribution of lacustrine birds in Quebec. Can. Wildl. Serv. Occ. Pap. No. 67: 7–41.Google Scholar
  8. DesGranges, J. -L. & M. L. Hunter, Jr., 1987. Duckling responses to lake acidification. Trans. n. am. Wildl. nat. Res. Conf. 52: 636–644.Google Scholar
  9. DesGranges, J. -L. & J. Rodrigue, 1986. Influence of acidity and competition with fish on the development of ducklings in Quebec. Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 30: 743–750.Google Scholar
  10. Eilers, J. M., G. J. Lein & R. G. Berg, 1984. Aquatic organisms in acidic environments: a literature review. Wis. Dep. nat. Res. tech. Bull. 150, 18 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Eriksson, M. O. G., 1984. Acidification of lakes: effects on waterbodies in Sweden. Ambio 13: 260–262.Google Scholar
  12. Eriksson, M. O. G., L. Henrikson, B. -I. Nilsson, G. Nyman, H. C. Oscarson, A. E. Stenson & K. Larsson, 1980. Predator-prey relations important for the biotic changes in acidified lakes. Ambio 9: 248–249.Google Scholar
  13. Friday, L. E., 1987. The diversity of macroinvertebrate and macrophyte communities in ponds. Freshwat. Biol. 18: 87–104.Google Scholar
  14. Gardarsson, A., 1979. Waterfowl populations of Lake Myvatn and recent changes in numbers and food habits. Oikos 32: 250–270.Google Scholar
  15. Gardarsson, A. & A. Einarsson, 1994. Responses of breeding duck populations to changes in food supply. In: J. J. Kerekes (ed.), Aquatic Birds in the Trophic Web of Lakes. Developments in Hydrobiology 96. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 15–27. Reprinted from Hydrobiologia 279/.Google Scholar
  16. Grahn, O., 1976. Macrophyte succession in Swedish lakes caused by deposition of airborne substances. In Proc. First Int. Symposium Acid Precipitation and the Forest Ecosystem.. Northeastern Forest Experimental Station, Broomall, PA. USDA Forest Serv. tech. Rep. NE-23: 519–530.Google Scholar
  17. Haramis, G. M. & D. S. Chu, 1987. Acid rain effects on waterfowl: use of black duck broods to assess food resources of experimentally acidified wetlands. In A. W. Diamond & F. Filion (eds), The value of birds. Int. Counc. Bird Pres. tech. Publ. No. 6: 173–181.Google Scholar
  18. Howmiller, R. P., 1972. Effects of preservatives on weights of some common macrobenthic invertebrates. Trans. am. Fish Soc. 101: 734–746.Google Scholar
  19. Hunter, M. L., Jr., J. L. Jones, K. E. Gibbs & J. R. Moring, 1986. Duckling responses to lake acidification: do black ducks and fish compete? Oikos 47: 26–32.Google Scholar
  20. Jackson, S. T. & D. F. Charles, 1988. Aquatic macrophytes in Adirondack (New York) takes: patterns of species composition in relation to environment. Can. J. Bot. 66: 1449–1460.Google Scholar
  21. Joyner, D. E., 1980. Influence of invertebrates on pond selection by ducks in Ontario. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 44: 700–705.Google Scholar
  22. Kerekes, J. J., A. C. Blouin & S. T. Beauchamp, 1990. Trophic response to phosphorus in acidic and non-acidic lakes in Nova Scotia, Canada. Hydrobiologia 191 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 53): 105–110.Google Scholar
  23. Kerekes, J. & B. Freedman, 1989. Characteristics of three acidic lakes in Kejimkujik National Park, Nova Scotia, Canada. Arch. envir. Contam. Toxicol. 18: 183–200.Google Scholar
  24. Kirby, R. E., 1988. American black duck breeding habitat enhancement in the northeastern United States: A review and synthesis. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Biol. Rep. 88, 50 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Krull, J. N., 1970. Aquatic plant-macro-invertebrate associations and waterfowl. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 34: 707–718.Google Scholar
  26. Longcore, J. R., R. K. Ross & K. L. Fisher, 1987. Wildlife resources at risk through acidification of wetlands. Trans. n. am. Wildl. nat. Res. Conf. 52: 608–618.Google Scholar
  27. McNicol, D. K., B. E. Bendell & R. K. Ross, 1987. Studies of the effects of acidification on aquatic wildlife in Canada: waterfowl and trophic relationships in small lakes in northern Ontario. Can. Wildl. Serv. Occ. Pap. No. 62.Google Scholar
  28. Moyle, J. B., 1961. Aquatic invertebrates as related to larger water plants and waterfowl. Minnesota Dept. Conserv. Invest. Rept. 233, 24 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Parker, G. R., M. J. Petrie & D. T. Sears, 1988. Waterfowl distribution relative to wetland acidity. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 56: 268–274.Google Scholar
  30. Rattner, B. A., G. M. Haramis, D. S. Chi & C. M. Bunck, 1987. Growth and physiological condition of black ducks reared on acidified wetlands. Can. J. Zool. 65: 2953–2958.Google Scholar
  31. Reinecke, K. J., 1979. Feeding ecology and development of juvenile black ducks in Maine. Auk 96: 737–745.Google Scholar
  32. Rusch, D. H., C. D. Ankney, H. Boyd, J. R. Longcore, F. Montalbano III, J. K. Ringleman & V. D. Stotts, 1989. Population ecology and harvest of the American black duck: a review. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 17: 379–406.Google Scholar
  33. Schell, V. A. & J. J. Kerekes, 1989. Distribution, abundance and biomass of benthic macroinvertebrates relative to pH and nutrients in eight lakes of Nova Scotia, Canada. Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 46: 359–374.Google Scholar
  34. Schindler, D. W., 1988. Effects of acid rain on freshwater ecosystems. Science 239: 149–157.Google Scholar
  35. Seymour, N. R. & R. D. Titman, 1978. Changes in activity patterns, agonistic behavior, and territoriality of black ducks (Anas rubripes) during the breeding season in a Nova Scotia tide marsh. Can. J. Zool. 56: 1773–1785.Google Scholar
  36. Stewart, C. C. & B. Freedman, 1989. Comparison of the macrophyte communities of a clearwater and a brownwater oligotrophic lake in Kejimkujik National Park, Nova Scotia. Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 46: 335–341.Google Scholar
  37. Sugden, L. G., 1973. Feeding ecology of Pintail, Gadwall, American Widgeon, and Lesser Scaup ducklings. Can. Wildl. Serv. Rept. Ser. No. 24.Google Scholar
  38. Swanson, G. A. & M. I. Meyer, 1973. The role of invertebrates in the feeding ecology of Anatinae during the breeding season. In The waterfowl management symposium. Atlantic Waterfowl Counc., Can. Wildl. Serv., Bur. Sport Fish. and Wildl., Province of N.B., Wildl. Manage. Inst., and Ducks Unlimited, Moncton, N. B.: 143–177.Google Scholar
  39. Underwood, J. K., J. G. Ogden III & D. L. Smith, 1986. Contemporary chemistry of Nova Scotian Lakes. Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 30: 991–999.Google Scholar
  40. Vollenweider, R. & J. Kerekes, 1982. OECD Eutrophication of Waters, Monitoring, Assessment and Control. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 154 pp.Google Scholar
  41. Wilkinson, L., 1990. SYSTAT: The system for statistics. SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  42. WQB, 1984. NAQUADAT dictionary of parameter codes. Water Quality Branch, Environment Canada, Ottawa, 318 pp.Google Scholar
  43. Welch, P. S., 1948. Limnological methods. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, 381 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cynthia A. Staicer
    • 1
  • Bill Freedman
    • 1
  • Diane Srivastava
    • 1
  • Nancy Dowd
    • 1
  • Jennifer Kilgar
    • 1
  • Jill Hayden
    • 1
  • Fred Payne
    • 2
  • Tom Pollock
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of BiologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.Wildlife DivisionNova Scotia Department of Natural ResourcesKentvilleCanada
  3. 3.Water Quality BranchEnvironment CanadaMonctonCanada

Personalised recommendations