Birds possess fast metabolism, and therefore they ingest and egest relatively large quantities of organic materials. Effects on the eutrophication depend on the site where they release their excrements. Mallards were studied as model animal to evaluate this process. Mallards of different ages have different ecological roles. In the beginning of their individual life they reduce the trophic level but later they contribute to the eutrophication processes.
Key wordsducks feeding excrements eutrophication
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Gere, G., 1983. The role of birds in matter and energy flow of the ecosystems. Puszta 1/10: 37–54.Google Scholar
- Gere, G. & S. Andrikovics, 1986. Untersuchungen über die Ernährungsbiologie des Kormorans (Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis) sowie deren Wirkung auf den trophischen Zustand des Wassers des Kis-Balaton I. Opusc. Zool. Budapest. 2: 67–76.Google Scholar
- Gere, G. & S. Andrikovics, 1992. Effects of waterfowl on water quality. Hydrobiologia 243/244 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 79): 445–448.Google Scholar
- Herodek, S., 1983. The eutrophycation of Lake Balaton and the possibilities of protection (in Hungarian). Magyar Tudomány 7–8: 506–517.Google Scholar
- Joó, O. & P. Pomogyi, 1989. Water management and environmental control on the western catchment of Lake Balaton (in Hungarian). Magyar Vizgazdálkodás 7: 19–24.Google Scholar
- Pomogyi, P., (ed.) 1991. Chemical, biological and mass balance investigations on Kis-Balaton Control System (in Hungarian). Szombathely - Keszthely, 258 pp.Google Scholar
- Ricklefs, R. E., 1968. Weight recession in nestling birds. Auk 85: 30–35.Google Scholar
- Scharf, W. C. & E. Balfour, 1971. Growth and development of nestling hen harriers. Ibis 113: 323–329.Google Scholar
- Szilágyi, F., L. Somlyódi & L. Koncsos, 1990. Operation of the Kis-Balaton reservoir: evaluation of nutrient removal rates. Hydrobiologia 191 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 53): 297–306.Google Scholar
- Varga, L., 1954. About lakes concerning with Hungarian standing waters (in Hungarian). Állatt. Közlem. 44: 243–255.Google Scholar