Skip to main content
Log in

Investigations into the breeding system of cauliflower Brassica oleracea var. botrytis (L.)

I. Studies of self-incompatibility

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Incompatibility reactions of 21 varieties of summer, autumn and winter type cauli-flowers were assessed by

  1. (a)

    comparing the seed sets per siliqua from separate inflorescences of the same plant which were self-pollinated and mixed-pollinated with self and Brussels sprout pollen,

  2. (b)

    correlating the percentage hybrids from the mixed-pollinations with those from natural cross-pollination,

  3. (c)

    differentiating between the self- and mixed-pollinations by the proportions of seed set in each quarter of the siliquas, and

  4. (d)

    calculating the percentage of hybrid seed in each quarter of the siliquas following mixed-pollination.

All three cauliflower types set similar amounts of seed upon artificial self-pollination, but the autumn and winter cauliflowers exhibited a "facultative self-incompatibility" by their ability to set more seed following mixed-pollination with self and Brussels sprout pollen. The percentage of hybrids in the progenies from the mixedpollinations were—summer cauliflowers 18.2, autumn cauliflowers 57.1, and winter cauliflowers 71.9. These results were similar to those found after natural cross-pollination.

Calculations of the percentage of hybrid seeds in each quarter of the siliqua showed that the ratio of hybrid: self seeds was the same in all quarters of the siliqua, indicating that restrictions of pollen tube growth in these cauliflower types is confined to the stigmatic surface.

It is suggested that the annual type summer cauliflowers were derived from biennial types by constant selection of a small number of plants for uniformity and quality which has led to self-compatibility as a correlated response. It is also suggested that under similar intense selection self-compatibility may possibly be attained in the autumn and winter types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balls, (1919). The cotton plant in Egypt. Macmillan. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. J. (1955). Self-incompatibility systems in Angiosperms III. Cruciferae. Heredity 9: 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. J. (1956). Cryptic self-incompatibility in the wallflower: Cheiranthus cheiri L. Heredity 10: 257–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, M. B. (1943). The origin and relationship of the Brassica crops. J. R. hort. Soc. 68: 172–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, J. L. (1954). Population and evolution-The significance of incompatibility. Proc. 8th Int. Bot. Congr., 163–169.

  • Drayner, J. M. (1959). Self and cross-fertility in field beans (Vicia faba L.) J. Agri. Sci. 53: 387–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensma, J. R. (1957). Teelt en veredeling van bloemkool. Meded. 96. Inst. Vered. Tuinb. gewassen.

  • Jones, D. F. (1922). Selective fertilisation and the rate of pollentube growth. Biol. Bull. 42: 167–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakizaki, Y. (1930): Studies on the genetics and physiology of self-and cross-incompatibility in the common cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata L.). Jap. J. Bot. 5: 133–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, T. H. and Harrison, G. J. (1924). Selective fertilisation in Cotton. J. Agric. Res. 27: 329–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, O. (1905). Über die Wirkung der Selbstbestäubung bei den Papilionaceen. Naturw. Z Land-Forstov. 3: 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, R., Hintze, S. and Avall, H. (1957). Klassificerande sort-och stamförsök med köksväxter. Med. 110. Tradgardsform Alnarp.

  • Lewis, D. (1951). Structure of the incompatibility gene. III. Types of spontaneous and induced mutation. Heredity 5: 399–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. (1943). Specific differences in Petunia. I. Incompatibility. J. Genet. 45: 215–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. and de Winton, D. (1941). Adaptation and counter-adaptation of the breeding system in Primula. Ann. Bot. Lond. N.S. 5: 297–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, D. R. (1957). The genetics of self-and cross-incompatibility in Brassica oleracea. Genetics 42 (3): 253–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, E. R. (1937). Cytological phenomena connected with self-sterility in the flowering plants. Genetics 22: 130–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L. (1957). Self-fertilization and population variability in the higher plants. Amer. Nat. 91: 337–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verkerk, K. (1954). The influence of low temperature on flower initiation and stem elongation in Brussels sprouts. Koninkl. Nederl. Akademie van Wetenschappen-Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. (1951). Genetics of incompatibility in alsike clover. Trifolium hybridum. Heredity 5: 51–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watts, L.E. Investigations into the breeding system of cauliflower Brassica oleracea var. botrytis (L.). Euphytica 12, 323–340 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027468

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027468

Keywords

Navigation