Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Harvest index and evoluation of major food crop cultivars in the tropics

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Relative importance of harvest index (I) and total biomass yield (B) to economic yield (Y) was assessed in several food crops at different levels of environmental productivity. Importance of B is generally higher in low than high yielding environments, while that of I is higher in high than low yielding environments. In some crops B is important throughout different yield levels while in others I is important even in low yielding environments.

Past efforts by anonymous farmers have consummated a good part of genetic improvement of crop yields through improvement in B. Many venerable land cultivars of grain crops, adapted to unimproved, limited-input cultural conditions, evolved through this process. The same process may not have thoroughly exhausted the yield improvement opportunity through improving I. Success in yield improvement by modern breeding has been limited mainly to high-input cultural conditions characterized by higher soil fertility and irrigation mainly through improvement in I. Varietal improvement possibility for less productive environments is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buzzell, R.I. & B.R.Buttery, 1977. Soybean harvest index in hillplots. Crop Sci. 17: 968–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, R.F.Jr., 1969. Plant morphology and stand geometry in relation to nitrogen. p. 265–285. In J.D.Eastin, F.A.Haskins, C.Y.Sullivan, C.H.M.vanBavel, and R.C.Dinaver (eds). Physiological aspects of crop yield. Am. Soc. Agron. Madison, Wis.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIAT, 1975. Annual report, Bean program. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia, P C1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIAT, 1977. Annual report, Bean program. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia, P B1–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIAT, 1978. Annual report, Bean program. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia, P C1–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, C.M. & J.Hamblin, 1976. The bioligical yield and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria. Adv. Agr. 28: 361–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, W.G., D.E.McCloud, R.L.McGraw & K.J.Boote, 1978. Physiological aspects of peanut yield improvement. Crop Sci. 18: 1015–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P.R. & R.C.Aquino, 1968. Studies on competition in rice III. The mechanism of competition among phenotypes. Evolution 22: 529–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannenberg, L.W. & R.B.Hunter, 1972. Yielding ability and competitive influence in hybrid mixture of maize. Crop Sci. 12: 274–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawano, K. & A.Tanaka, 1967. Studies on the competitive ability of rice plant in population. J. Fac. Agr., Hokkaido Univ. Sapporo, Japan 55: 339–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawano, K., H.Gonzalez & M.Lucena, 1974. Intraspecific competition, competition with weeds, and spacing response in rice. Crop Sci. 14: 841–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawano, K., PabloDaza, AlvoraAmaya, MarioRios & Wania M.F.Goncalyez, 1978. Evaluation of cassava germplasm for productivity. Crop Sci. 17: 377–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawano, K. & MichaelThung, 1982. Intergenotypic competition and competition with associated crops in cassava. Crop Sci. 22: 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawano, K. & P.R.Jennings, 1983. Tropical crop breeding—Achievements and challenges. P 81–99. In: Potential productivity of field crops under different environments. Int. Rice Res. Inst., Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, J.M., 1973. The performance of semi-dwarf wheats in New Zealand: Implications for New Zealand wheat breeding. P 557–559. In: E.R. Sears & L.M.S. Sears (Eds). Proc. Fourth Int. Wheat Genet. Symp., Agric. Exp. Stn., College of Agr., Univ. of Missouri, Colombia, Mo.

  • Sims, H.H., 1963. Changes in the hay production and the harvest index of Australian oat varieties. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 3: 198–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, I.D. & N.C.Stoskopf, 1971. Harvest index in cereals. Agr. J. 63: 224–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syme, J.R., 1970. A high-yielding Mexican semi-dwarf wheat and the relationship of yield to harvest index and other varietal characteristics. Aust. J. Expt. Agric. Anim. Husb. 10: 350–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, A., K.Kawano & J.Yamaguchi, 1967. Photosynthesis, respiration, and plant type of the tropical rice plants. Int. Rice Res. Inst., Los Banos, Philippines. Tech. Bull. No. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • YamaguchiJunichi, 1974. Varietal traits limiting the grain yield of tropical maize. IV. Plant traits and productivity of tropical varieties. Soil Sci. Plt. Nutr. 20: 287–304.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kawano, K. Harvest index and evoluation of major food crop cultivars in the tropics. Euphytica 46, 195–202 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027218

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027218

Key words

Navigation