Skip to main content
Log in

The early time course of the inhibition of stem growth of etiolated pea seedlings by fluorescent light

  • Published:
Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stem elongation responses of etiolated peas (Pisum sativum L.) to fluorescent light (35–45 μmol.mt-2.s-1) were recorded using high resolution position transducers. Continuous fluorescent light decreased growth by 70% within 9 min. The growth rate declined to 5% of the control over the next 2 h and remained at this level for 7 h. Pulses of fluorescent light ranging from 8 s to 34 min led to partial suppression of growth and resulted in a complex kinetic response. The distinctive kinetics of blue and red light inhibition were apparent as components of the responses to non-saturating levels of fluorescent light. The rapid suppression of growth by blue light was not affected by concomitant red light. The lag time for the onset of red light inhibition was not affected by concomitant blue, but the rate of inhibition appeared accelerated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Behringer FJ, Davies PJ and Reid JB (1990) Genetic analysis of the role of gibberellin in the red light inhibition of stem elongation in etiolated seedlings. Plant Physiol. 94: 432–439

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bleiss W and Smith H (1985) Rapid suppression of extension growth in dark-grown wheat seedlings by red light. Plant Physiol. 77: 552–555

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cosgrove DJ (1981) Rapid suppresion of growth by blue light. Occurrence, time course, and general characteristics. Plant Physiol. 67: 584–590

    Google Scholar 

  4. Iino M, Briggs W (1984) Growth distribution during first positive phototropic curvature of maize coleoptiles. Plant Cell Environ. 7: 97–104

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ingram TJ, Reid JB, Murfet IC, Gaskin P, Willis CL and MacMIllan J (1984) Internode length in Pisum. The Le gene controls the 3B-hydroxylation of gibberellin A20 to gibberellin A1. Planta 160: 455–463

    Google Scholar 

  6. Laskowski MJ, Briggs WR (1989) Regulation of pea epicotyl elongation by blue light. Fluence-response relationships and growth distribution. Plant Physiol. 89: 293–298

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lockhart JA (1960) Intracellular mechanism of growth inhibition by radiant energy. Plant Physiol. 35: 129–135

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meijer G (1968) Rapid growth inhibition of Gherkin hypocotyls in blue light. Acta. Bot. Neerl. 17: 9–14

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parker K, Baskin TI and Briggs WR (1989) Evidence for a phytochrome-mediated phototropism in etiolated pea seedlings. Plant Physiol 89: 493–497

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ross JJ and Reid JB (1989) internode length in Pisum. Biochemical expression of the le gene in darkness. Physiol. Plant 76: 164–172

    Google Scholar 

  11. Russell DW and Galston AW (1968) Comparative analysis of phytochrome-mediated growth responses in internodes of dwarf and tall pea plants. Planta 78: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  12. Warpeha KMF, Kaufman LS (1989) Blue-light regulation of epicotyl elongation in Pisum sativum. Plant Physiol. 89: 544–548

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Behringer, F.J., Davies, P.J. The early time course of the inhibition of stem growth of etiolated pea seedlings by fluorescent light. Plant Growth Regul 12, 341–345 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027216

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027216

Key words

Navigation