Skip to main content
Log in

Acrorhagi, catch tentacles and sweeper tentacles: a synopsis of ‘aggression’ of actiniarian and scleractinian Cnidaria

  • Proceedings
  • XII. Physiology and behaviour Population structure and behaviour of sea anemones
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three types of organ (acrorhagi and catch tentacles in sea anemones, and sweeper tentacles in corals) are described with regard to both morphology and ‘aggressive’ function. Species known to possess such organs are listed. Research on the functions of these particular organs is reviewed and some exceptions to their usual behaviour patterns are highlighted. Further research on allogeneic recognition might shed more light on the phylogeny of anemones and corals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Äbel, E. F., 1954. Ein Beitrag zur Giftwirkung der Aktinien und Funktion der Randsäckchen. Zool. Anz. 153: 259–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ates, R. M. L., 1988. Verlengde tentakels bij tropische koralen. Zee-Aquarium 38: 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayre, D. J., 1982. Inter-genotype aggression in the solitary sea anemone Actinia tenebrosa. Mar. Biol. 68: 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak, R. P. M. & J. H. B. W. Elgershuizen, 1976. Patterns of oil-sediment rejection in corals. Mar. Biol. 37: 105–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak, R. P. M., R. M. Termaat & R. Dekker, 1982. Complexity of coral interactions: influence of time, location of interaction and epifauna. Mar. Biol. 69: 215–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigger, C. H., 1976. The acrorhagial response in Anthopleura krebsi: intraspecific and interspecific recognition. In G. O. Mackie (ed.), Coelenterate Ecology and Behavior. Plenum Press, N.Y.: 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigger, C. H., 1980. Interspecific and intraspecific acrorhagial aggressive behavior among sea anemones: a recognition of self and not-self. Biol. Bull. 159: 117–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigger, C. H., 1982. The cellular basis of the aggressive acrorhagial response of sea anemones. J. Morph. 173: 259–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigger, C. H., 1988. The role of nematocysts in anthozoan aggression. In D. A. Hessinger & H. M. Lenhoff (eds), The Biology of Nematocysts. Academic Press, London: 295–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnin, J.-P., 1964. Recherches sur la ‘réaction d'aggression’ et sur le fonctionnement des acrorrhages d'Actinia equina L. Bull. biol. Fr. Belg. 98: 225–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brace, R. C., 1981. Intraspecific aggression in the colour morphs of the anemone Phymactis clematis from Chile. Mar. Biol. 64: 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brace, R. C. & D. L. J. Quicke, 1986. Seasonal changes in dispersion within an aggregation of the anemone Actinia equina, with a reappraisal of the role of intraspecific aggression. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 66: 49–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brace, R. C. & S.-J. Santer, 1991. Experimental habituation of aggression in the sea anemone Actinia equina. Hydrobiologia 216/217: 533–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlgren, O., 1929. Über eine Actiniariengattung mit besonderen Fangtentakeln. Zool. Anz. 81: 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlgren, O., 1940. A contribution to the knowledge of the cnidom in the Anthozoa. Acta Univ. lund. (New Ser.) 36 (3): 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carthy, J. D. & F. J. Ebling, 1964. The natural history of aggression. Academic Press, N.Y., 449 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chornesky, E. A., 1983. Induced development of sweeper tentacles on the reef coral Agaricia agaricites: a response to direct competition. Biol. Bull. 165: 569–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chornesky, E. A. & S. L. Williams, 1983. Distribution of sweeper tentacles on Montastraea cavernosa. In M. L. Reaka (ed.), The Ecology of Deep and Shallow Coral Reefs. National Office of Undersea Research, Rockville: 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutress, C. E., 1961. Habrosanthus bathamae, n. gen., n. sp. (Actiniaria: Sagartiidae) from New Zealand. Trans. r. Soc. N.Z. 1: 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalyell, J. G., 1848. Rare and remarkable animals of Scotland, 2. Van Voorst, London, 322 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog, J. C., 1977. The marginal tentacles of Rhodactis sanctithomae (Corallimorpharia) and the sweeper tentacles of Montastrea cavernosa (Scleractinia); their cnidom and possible function. Proc. 3rd int. Coral Reef Symp. 1: 463–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog, J. C., 1987. A redescription of the sea anemone Bunodosoma biscayensis (Fischer, 1874) (Actiniaria, Actinfdae). Zool. Meded., Leiden 61: 533–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, K. W., 1971. Actiniaria from Mururoa Atoll, Tuamoto, Polynesia. Cah. pacif. 15: 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertman, S. C. & D. Davenport, 1981. Tentacular nematocyte discharge and ‘self-recognition’ in Anthopleura elegantissima Brandt. Biol. Bull. 161: 366–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L., 1973. Intraspecific aggression and its effect on the distribution of Anthopleura elegantissima and some related sea anemones. Biol. Bull. 144: 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, H., 1987. The predominance of clones in populations of the sea anemone Anthopleura asiatica (Uchida). Biol. Bull. 172: 202–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, H., 1983. Induced formation and behavior of the sweeper tentacles of a scleractinian coral Galaxea fascicularis. Galaxea 2: 78–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukui, Y., 1986. Catch tentacles in the sea anemone Haliplanella luciae: role as organs of social behavior. Mar. Biol. 91: 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosse, P. H., 1858–59. Actinologia Britannica. Van Voorst, London, 362 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand, C., 1961. Two new acontiate New Zealand sea anemones. Trans. r. Soc. N.Z. 1: 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand, C., 1966. On the evolution of the Actiniaria. In W. J. Rees (ed.), The Cnidaria and their Evolution. Academic Press, London; N.Y.: 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidaka, M. & K. Yamazato, 1984. Intraspecific interactions in a scleractinian coral Galaxea fascicularis: induced formation of sweeper tentacles. Coral Reefs 3: 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildemann, W. H., C. H. Bigger & I. S. Johnston, 1979. Histoincompatibility reactions and allogeneic polymorphism among invertebrates. Transplant. Proc. 11: 1136–1141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildemann, W. H., D. S. Linthicum & D. C. Vann, 1975. Transplantation and immunoincompatibility reactions among reef-building corals. Immunogenetics 2: 269–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. W., 1983. Intrasexual aggression in Metridium senile. Biol. Bull. 165: 416–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, J. C., 1971. Interspecific aggression by scleractinian corals. I. The rediscovery of Scolymia cubensis (Milne Edwards and Haime). Bull. mar. Sci. 21: 952–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, J. C., 1973. Interspecific aggression by scleractinian corals. II. Why the race is not only to the swift. Bull. mar. Sci. 23: 260–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. B. & W. S. Price, 1975. Feeding mechanisms and feeding strategies of Atlantic reef corals. J. Zool., Lond. 176: 527–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubbock, R., 1980. Clone-specific cellular recognition in a sea anemone. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77: 6667–6669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubbock, R. & G. A. B. Shelton, 1981. Electrical activity following cellular recognition of self and non-self in a sea anemone. Nature, Lond. 289: 59–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, C. S., 1986. Laboratory evidence for a size refuge in competitive interactions between the hydroids Hydractinia echinata (Flemming) and Podocoryne carnea (Sars). Biol. Bull. 171: 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottaway, J. R., 1978. Population ecology of the intertidal anemone Actinia tenebrosa. 1. Pedal locomotion and intraspecific aggression. Aust. J. mar. freshwat. Res. 29: 787–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires, D. de O., 1988. Tricnidactis errans n. gen., n. sp. (Cnidaria, Actiniaria, Haliplanellidae) from Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Revta bras. Biol. 48: 507–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portielje, A. F. J., 1933. On a remarkable and purposive feeding behaviour in the sea-anemone Diadumene cincta Stephenson, a short note on Metridium senile var. pallidum (Holdsworth) and Anthopleura thallia (Gosse), also until now unknown on the Dutch shore, and a list of Dutch Actiniaria. Tijdschr. ned. dierk. Vereen. (Ser. 3) 3: 132–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, J. E., 1977. Aggressive function and induced development of catch tentacles in the sea anemone Metridium senile (Coelenterata, Actiniaria). Biol. Bull. 153: 355–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, J. E. & C. L. Kitting, 1982. Intraspecific aggression and population distributions of the sea anemone Metridium senile. Biol. Bull. 162: 345–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, C. A., P. Dustan & J. C. Lang, 1979. Maintenance of living space by sweeper tentacles of Montastrea cavernosa, a Caribbean reef coral. Mar. Biol. 55: 181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammarco, P. W., J. C. Coll & S. La Barre, 1982. Competition between soft corals (Octocorallia) and scleractinian corals: species-specific allelopathy. Aust. mar. Sci. Bull. 79: 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, K. P., M. Müller & M. Weber, 1986. Alloimmune memory for glycoproteid recognition molecules in sea anemones competing for space. Mar. Biol. 92: 73–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H., 1974. On evolution in the Anthozoa. Proc. 2nd int. Coral Reef Symp. 1: 533–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebens, K. P., 1984. Agonistic behavior in the intertidal sea anemone Anthopleura xanthogrammica. Biol. Bull. 166: 457–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, C. R. C., 1982. Coral populations on reef slopes and their major controls. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 7: 83–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, T. A., 1925. On a new British sea anemone. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 13: 880–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, T. A., 1928. The British sea anemones, 1. Ray Society, London, 148 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoliczka, F., 1869. On the anatomy of Sagartia schilleriana and Membranipora bengalensis, a new coral and a bryozoan living in brackish water at Port Canning. J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal 38: 28–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrill, A. E., 1866. On the polyps and echinoderms of New England with descriptions of new species. Proc. Boston Soc. nat. Hist. 10: 333–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G. M. & R. N. Mariscal, 1983. The development of a sea anemone tentacle specialized for aggression: morphogenesis and regression of the catch tentacle of Haliplanella luciae (Cnidaria, Anthozoa). Biol. Bull. 164: 506–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellington, G. M., 1980. Reversal of digestive interactions between Pacific reef corals: mediation by sweeper tentacles. Oecologia 47: 340–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. B., 1975. Catch-tentacles in sea anemones: occurrence in Haliplanella luciae (Verrill) and a review of current knowledge. J. nat. Hist. 9: 241–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. B., 1978. Some recent observations on the acrorhagi of sea anemones. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 58: 787–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. B., 1980. A further note on catch-tentacles in sea anemones. Trans. Norfolk Norwich Nat. Soc. 25: 84–86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, R.B. Acrorhagi, catch tentacles and sweeper tentacles: a synopsis of ‘aggression’ of actiniarian and scleractinian Cnidaria. Hydrobiologia 216, 539–545 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00026511

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00026511

Key words

Navigation