Skip to main content
Log in

Why only one of two common Central Texas Anostraca atop Enchanted Rock?

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Branchinecta packardi Pearse, 1912 grows rapidly and begins reproducing at the age of seven days. The first clutch contains only one or two eggs. Females deposit a clutch each day. Reproductive populations occur during all seasons in Central Texas. Streptocephalus texanus Packard, 1871 has a slower growth rate and does not begin reproduction until 11 days of age. Females deposit a clutch every second day. The species is a warm season form in Central Texas. These life history differences most likely explain why B. packardi inhabits the shallow, exposed weather-pit pools atop Enchanted Rock and S. texanus does not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blank, H. R., 1951. Exfoliation and weathering on granite domes in Central Texas. Tex. J. Sci. 3: 376–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, F., 1967. Effects of physical-chemical factors on the distribution and occurrence of some southeastern Wyoming phyllopods. Ecology 48: 472–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, F. R., 1971. Some effects of temperature and oxygen concentration on phyllopod ecology. Ecology 52: 343–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. E., 1964. Packard's and Pearse's species of Branchinecta: analysis of a nomenclatural involvement. Am. Midl. Nat. 71: 466–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, S. S. & S. V. Romney, 1975. The occurrence of four new anostracan (Crustacea) phyllopods in Utah, multispecies records, and some notes on their ecology. S. West Nat. 52: 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, W. G., 1950. A new locality record for Branchinecta coloradensis, with habitat notes on two species of fairy shrimp in Central Texas. Ecology 31: 655–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1984. Climatological data Texas August 1984 89(8): 26.

  • Prophet, C. W., 1962. Ecology and reproduction of five species of Anostraca in Oklahoma. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oklahoma, Norman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prophet, C. W., 1963a. Physical-chemical characteristics of habitats and seasonal occurrence of some Anostraca in Oklahoma and Kansas. Ecology 44: 798–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prophet, C. W., 1963b. Some factors influencing the hatching of anostracan eggs. Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci. 66: 150–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prophet, C. W., 1963c. Egg production by laboratory cultured Anostraca. S. West Nat. 8: 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, V. W., C. R. Malone & V. L. DeVlaming, 1967. Dispersal of aquatic organisms: viability of disseminules recovered from the intestinal tract of captive killdeer. Ecology 48: 672–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sublette, J. E. & M. S. Sublette, 1967. The limnology of playa lakes on the Llano Estacado, New Mexico and Texas. S. West Nat. 12: 369–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribbey, B. A., 1965. A field and laboratory study of ecological succession in temporary ponds. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Belk, D. Why only one of two common Central Texas Anostraca atop Enchanted Rock?. Hydrobiologia 212, 83–86 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025990

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025990

Key words

Navigation