Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 313, Issue 1, pp 267–278 | Cite as

Relation to habitat in rotifers

  • Birger Pejler
Article

Abstract

Rotifera should be especially suited for an analysis of habitat relations because this group contains such a high number of species, inhabiting diverse environments. Furthermore, rotifers are to a large extent cosmopolitan, implying that ecological barriers, rather than geographical, are decisive of their distribution. In this review a short characterization of the rotifer fauna in different habitats is given, whereby macroenvironments and microenvironments are reported separately. The macroenvironments are classified as follows: ‘harmonious’ lakes and ponds, arctic and antarctic waters, hot springs, hypertrophic-saprobic environments, mires, strongly acidic waters, saline waters, temporary water bodies, subterranean waters, running waters, oceans, terrestrial environments. The following microenvironments are distinguished: macrophytes (housing periphytic rotifers), open water (with planktic forms), minerogenous sediments (with psammon and hyporheos), organogenous sediments, other organisms (i.e. parasites and epizoans).

Many rotifers are more or less euryecious, while relatively few are strongly restricted in their choice of habitat. In extreme environments a low number of species is found, but often a high number of individuals within these species. These rotifers are usually primary consumers, and for natural reasons extreme environments are characterized by a low number of trophic levels.

In environments with a high species number the separate species differ very much in their morphology, making it difficult to find common traits which may be interpreted as adaptations to the respective habitats. The most apparent adaptations ought to be found among the planktic rotifers, and these adaptations seem to constitute largely a protection against predators. Rotifers in extreme environments are usually not very apart in a morphological or taxonomical respect, with their most close relatives living in ‘normal’ habitats and sometimes euryecious (an apparent exception from this rule is formed by the class Seisonidea). Adaptations to deviating chemical and physical environments may develop relatively rapidly (seen from a geological perspective), while the more fundamental changes (occurring during a longer period of time) seem to be a response to biotic factors (e.g., the development of different types of trophi for facilitating food collection).

Key words

rotifers ecology substrate habitat 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allan, J. D., 1976. Life history patterns in zooplankton. Am. Nat. 110: 165–180.Google Scholar
  2. Amrén, H., 1964a. Ecological studies of zooplankton populations in some ponds on Spitsbergen. Zool. Bidr. Upps. 36: 161–191.Google Scholar
  3. Amrén, H., 1964b. Ecological and taxonomical studies on zooplankton from Spitsbergen. Zool. Bidr. Upps. 36: 209–276.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, R. S. & A.-M. De Henau, 1980. An assessment of the meiobenthos from nine mountain lakes in western Canada. Hydrobiologia 70: 257–264.Google Scholar
  5. Arov, I. V., 1985. Psammonnye kolovratki osera Bajkal. In Kolovratki, L. A. Kutikova., Akademiya nauk SSSR, Leningrad. Nauka: 189–198. (Russian only.) (ed.)Google Scholar
  6. Beauchamp, P. de, 1952. Un facteur de la variabilité chez les rotifères du genre Brachionus. C. r. hebd. Seanc. Acad. Sci. 234: 573–575.Google Scholar
  7. Begon, M., J. L. Harper & C. R. Townsend, 1986. Ecology: Individuals, populations and communities. Blackwell, 876 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Bērzinš, B., 1955a. Rotatoriefaunan i Aneboda fiskdammar. Skrifter utg. Södra Sveriges Fiskerifören., Årsskrift 1954–1955: 31–37. (Swedish, with German summary.)Google Scholar
  9. Bērzinš, B., 1955b. Taxonomie und Verbreitung von Keratella valga und verwandten Formen. Ark. Zool., ser. 2, bd 8: 549–559.Google Scholar
  10. Bērzinš, B., 1960. Rotatoria I. Cons. int. explor. met. Fich. Ident. Zooplancton 84: 1–7.Google Scholar
  11. Bērzinš, B., 1972. Eine Mikrobenthosstudie an Rotatorien. Hydrobiologia 40: 447–452.Google Scholar
  12. Bērzinš, B., 1982. Zur Kenntnis der Rotatorienfauna von Madagascar. Limnol. Inst., Lund, 24 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Bērzinš, B. & B. Pejler, 1989a. Rotifer occurrence and trophic degree. Hydrobiologia 182: 171–180.Google Scholar
  14. Bērzinš, B. & B. Pejler, 1989b. Rotifer occurrence in relation to oxygen content. Hydrobiologia 183: 165–172.Google Scholar
  15. Brain, C. K. & W. Koste, 1993. Rotifers of the genus Proales from saline springs in the Namib desert, with the description of a new species. Hydrobiologia 255/256 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 83): 449–454.Google Scholar
  16. Braioni, M. G., B. Duzzin, M. C. Centurioni, G. Penna, L. Negroni & S. Campaioli, 1981. The interstitial hyporreical fauna of Brenta River and its environment. Boll. mus. civ. st. nat. Verona, VII, 1980: 235–274. (In Italian, with English summary.)Google Scholar
  17. Brett, M. T., 1989. Zooplankton communities and acidification processes (a review). Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 44: 387–414.Google Scholar
  18. Brock, M. A. & R. Shiel, 1983. The composition of aquatic communities in saline wetlands in Western Australia. Hydrobiologia 105 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 16): 77–84.Google Scholar
  19. Brönmark, C., 1985. Interactions between macrophytes, epiphytes and herbivores: an experimental approach. Oikos 45: 26–30.Google Scholar
  20. Carlin, B., 1939. Über die Rotatorien einiger Seen bei Aneboda. Medd. Lunds Univ. limnol. Instn 2., 68 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Chengalath, R. & W. Koste, 1989. Composition and distributional patterns in arctic rotifers. Hydrobiologia 186/187 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 52): 191–200.Google Scholar
  22. Clarke, F. W., 1924. The data of geochemistry. 5th ed. Bull. U.S. Geol. Surv. 770, 841 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Dartnall, H. J. G., 1983. Rotifers of the Antarctic and Subantarctic. Hydrobiologia 104 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 14): 57–60.Google Scholar
  24. Dartnall, H. J. G. & E. D. Hollowday, 1985. Antarctic rotifers. British Antarctic Survey, sci.rep., no. 100, 46 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Delbecque, E. J. P. & R. E. M. Suykerbuyk, 1988. A comparison of the periphyton of Nuphar lutea and Nymphaea alba. Spatial and temporal changes in the occurrence of sessile microfauna. Arch. Hydrobiol. 112: 541–566.Google Scholar
  26. De Ridder, M., 1968. Recherches sur les Rotifères des eaux saumatres de la Lorraine orientale. Hydrobiologia 32: 340–382.Google Scholar
  27. De Ruyter van Steveninck, E. D., B. Van Zanten & W. Admiraal, 1990. Phases in the development of riverine plankton: Examples from the rivers Rhine and Meuse. Hydrobiol. Bull. 24: 47–55.Google Scholar
  28. De Smet, W. H., E. A. Van Rompu & L. Beyens, 1993. Contribution to the rotifer fauna of subarctic Greenland (Kangerlussuaq and Ammassalik area). Hydrobiologia 255/256 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 83): 463–466.Google Scholar
  29. Donner, J., 1950. Rotatorien der Humusböden. Hüllen und Gehäuse bei bdelloiden Rädertieren, besonders bei Bodenbewohnern. Österr. zool. Z. 2: 287–335.Google Scholar
  30. Donner, J., 1951. Erste Übersicht über die Rotatorienfauna einiger Humusböden. Österr. zool. Z. 3: 175–240.Google Scholar
  31. Donner, J., 1964. Die Rotatorien-Synusien submerser Makrophyten der Donau bei Wien und mehrerer Alpenbäche. Arch. Hydrobiol./Suppl. 27: 227–324.Google Scholar
  32. Donner, J., 1965. Ordnung Bdelloidea (Rotatoria, Rädertiere). Berlin, 297 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Donner, J., 1972a. Die Rädertierbestände submerser Moose und weiterer Merotope im Bereich der Stauräume der Donau an der deutsch-österreichischen Landesgrenze. Arch. Hydrobiol./Suppl. 44: 49–114.Google Scholar
  34. Donner, J., 1972b. Rädertiere der Grenzschicht Wasser-Sediment aus dem Neusiedler See. S.B. öst Akad. Wiss. 180: 49–63.Google Scholar
  35. Dumont, H. J., 1983. Biogeography of rotifers. Hydrobiologia 104 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 14): 19–30.Google Scholar
  36. Edmondson, W. T., 1944. Ecological studies of sessile Rotatoria. Part I. Factors affecting distribution. Ecol. Monogr. 14: 31–66.Google Scholar
  37. Epp, R. W. & P. W. Winston, 1978. The effect of salinity and pH on the activity and oxygen consumption of Brachionus plicatilis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 59A: 9–12.Google Scholar
  38. Eriksen, B. G., 1968. Marine rotifers found in Norway, with descriptions of two new and one little known species. Sarsia 33: 23–34.Google Scholar
  39. Esparcia, A., M. R. Miracle & M. Serra, 1989. Brachionus plicatilis tolerance to low oxygen concentrations. Hydrobiologia 186/187 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 52): 331–337.Google Scholar
  40. Evans, W. A., 1984. Seasonal abundances of the psammic rotifers of a physically controlled stream. Hydrobiologia 108: 105–114.Google Scholar
  41. Francez, A. J., 1984a. Rotifères sessiles observés en Auvergne. Cahiers Nat., N.S. 40: 73–80.Google Scholar
  42. Francez, A. J., 1984b. Écologie des peuplements de Rotiféres sessiles des lacs-tourbieres d'Auvergne (France). Bull. Écol. 15: 231–237.Google Scholar
  43. Gilbert, J. J., 1966. Rotifer ecology and embryological induction. Science 151: 1234–1237.Google Scholar
  44. Gilbert, J. J., 1974. Effect of tocopherol on the growth and development of rotifers. Amer. J. clin. nutr. 27: 1005–1016.Google Scholar
  45. Gilbert, J. J., 1980. Feeding in the rotifer Asplanchna: Behavior, cannibalism, selectivity, prey defenses, and impact on rotifer communities. In Evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities, W. C. Kerfoot (ed.), University Press of New England: 158–172.Google Scholar
  46. Gilbert, J. J., 1985. Escape response of the rotifer Polyarthra: a high-speed cinematographic analysis. Oecologia 66: 322–331.Google Scholar
  47. Gilbert, J. J., 1987. The Polyarthra escape response: Defense against interference from Daphnia. Hydrobiologia 147 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 42): 235–238.Google Scholar
  48. Gilbert, J. J., 1988. Suppression of rotifer populations by Daphnia: A review of the evidence, the mechanisms, and the effects on zooplankton community structure. Limnol. Oceanogr. 33: 1286–1303.Google Scholar
  49. Green, J., 1977. Dwarfing of rotifers in tropical crater lakes. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih., Ergebn. Limnol. 8: 232–236.Google Scholar
  50. Green, J., 1981. Associations of rotifers in Australian crater lakes. J. Zool., Lond. 193: 469–486.Google Scholar
  51. Green, J., 1986. Zooplankton associations in some Ethiopian crater lakes. Freshwat. Biol. 16: 495–499.Google Scholar
  52. Green, J., 1993. Diversity and dominance in planktonic rotifers. Hydrobiologia 255/256 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 83): 345–352.Google Scholar
  53. Green, J. & H. Kramadibrata, 1988. A note on Lake Goang, an unusual acid lake in Flores, Indonesia. Freshwat. Biol. 20: 195–198.Google Scholar
  54. Green, J. & S. Mengestou, 1991. Specific diversity and community structure of Rotifera in a salinity series of Ethiopian inland waters. Hydrobiologia 209: 95–106.Google Scholar
  55. Green, J. A. I. el Moghraby & O. M. M. Ali, 1979. Biological observations on the crater lakes of Jebel Marra, Sudan. J. Zool., Lond. 189: 493–502.Google Scholar
  56. Halbach, U., 1971a. Zum Adaptivwert der zyklomorphen Dornenbildung von Brachionus calyciflorus Pallas (Rotatoria). I. Räuber-Beute-Beziehung in Kurzzeit-Versuchen. Oecologia 6: 267–288.Google Scholar
  57. Halbach, U., 1971b. Das Rädertier Asplanchna — ein ideales Untersuchungsobjekt. III. Ein Räuber liefert seiner Beute die Abwehrwaffen. Mikrokosmos 1971: 360–365.Google Scholar
  58. Harnisch, O., 1951. Hydrophysiologie der Tiere. Binnengewässer, 19. Stuttgart, 299 pp.Google Scholar
  59. Hauer, J., 1939. Zur Kenntnis subterraner Rotatorien. Zool. Anz. 126: 41–44.Google Scholar
  60. Herzig, A. & W. Koste, 1989. The development of Hexarthra spp. in a shallow alkaline lake. Hydrobiologia 186/187 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 52): 129–136.Google Scholar
  61. Hollowday, E. D., 1950. Introduction to the study of the Rotifera. XVI. The Microscope 7: 287–290. 1993.Google Scholar
  62. Hollowday, E. D., 1993. Cephalodella edax sp. nov. A. rotifer parasitic in the motile colonial alga Uroglena volvox Ehrenberg. Hydrobiologia 255/256 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 83): 445–448.Google Scholar
  63. Hutchinson, G. E., 1967. A treatise on limnology. Vol. II. Introduction to lake biology and the limnoplankton. Wiley & Sons, 1115 pp.Google Scholar
  64. Hynes, H. B. N., 1970. The ecology of running waters. Univ. Toronto Press. 555 pp.Google Scholar
  65. Kerfoot, W. C. & M. Lynch, 1987. Branchiopod communities: Associations with planktivorous fish in space and time. In Predation, Direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities (eds) W. C. Kerfoot & A. Sih: 267–378.Google Scholar
  66. Kertész, G., 1956. The rotifers of the periodical waters of Farmos. Acta zool. acad sci. Hung. 2: 339–358.Google Scholar
  67. Kirk, K. L., & J. J. Gilbert, 1988. Escape behavior of Polyarthra in response to artificial flow stimuli. Bull. mar. sci. 43: 551–560.Google Scholar
  68. Klement, V., 1960. Zur Rotatorienfauna ephemerer Gewässer. Jh. Ver. vaterl. Naturkde Württemberg 115: 337–349.Google Scholar
  69. Klimowicz, H., 1967. Rotifers of astatic waters. Part II. Rotifers of small water bodies from the Mikolajki region. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 14: 91–110.Google Scholar
  70. Klimowicz, H., 1972. Rotifers of the near bottom zone of Lakes Mikolajskie and Taltowisko. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 19: 167–178.Google Scholar
  71. Koste, W., 1976. Über die Rädertierbestände (Rotatoria) der oberen und mittleren Hase in den Jahren 1966–1969. Osnabrücker Naturw. Mitt. 4: 191–263.Google Scholar
  72. Koste, W., 1978. Rotatoria. Die Rädertiere Mitteleuropas. Ein Bestimmungswerk begr. von Max Voigt. Überordnung Monogononta. Vol. 1–2. 673 pp. + 234 pl.Google Scholar
  73. Koste, W., 1980. Das Rädertier-Porträt. Brachionus plicatilis, ein Salzwasserrädertier. Mikrokosmos 1980: 148–155.Google Scholar
  74. Koste, W., 1981. Das Rädertier-Porträt. Einige auffallende Synchaeta-Arten aus Küstengewässern. Mikrokosmos 1981: 169–176.Google Scholar
  75. Kutikova, L. A. & I. V. Arov, 1985. Novie vidy psammofilnych kolovratok (Rotatoria) v osere Bajkal. In Kolovratki, L. A. Kutikova (ed.), Akademiya nauk SSSR, Leningrad. Nauka: 50–54. (Russian only.)Google Scholar
  76. Mäemets, A., 1983. Rotifers as indicators of lake types in Estonia. Hydrobiologia 104 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 14): 357–361.Google Scholar
  77. Manuel, J. De & J. Armengol, 1993. Rotifer assemblages: a contribution to the typology of Spanish reservoirs. Hydrobiologia 255/256 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 83): 421–428.Google Scholar
  78. Matveeva, L., 1991. Planktonic rotifers as indicators of trophic state. Bull. Moscow Nat. Soc., Biol. Sect., 96: 54–62. (Russian, with English summary.)Google Scholar
  79. May, L., 1989. Epizoic and parasitic rotifers. Hydrobiologia 186/187 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 52): 59–67.Google Scholar
  80. Mazuelos, N., J. Toja & C. Guisande, 1993. Rotifers in ephemeral ponds of Donana National Park. Hydrobiologia 255/256 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 83): 429–1134.Google Scholar
  81. Modenutti, B. E. & M. C. Claps, 1988. Monogononta rotifers from plankton and periphyton of Pampasic lotic environments (Argentina). Limnologica 19: 167–175.Google Scholar
  82. Montet, G., 1915. Contribution a l'étude des rotateurs du bassin du Léman. Revue suisse Zool. 23: 251–360.Google Scholar
  83. Moore, G. M., 1939. A limnological investigation of the microscopic benthic fauna of Douglas Lake, Michigan. Ecol. Monogr. 9: 537–582.Google Scholar
  84. Morling, G. & B. Pejler, 1990. Acidification and zooplankton development in some west-Swedish lakes 1966–1983. Limnologica 20: 307–318.Google Scholar
  85. Nilssoon, N.-A. & B. Pejler, 1973. On the relation between fish fauna and zooplankton composition in north Swedish lakes. Rep. inst. freshwat. res. Drottningholm 53: 51–77.Google Scholar
  86. Nogrady, T., 1982. Rotifera. In S. P. Parker (ed.), Synopsis and classification of living organisms. McGraw-Hill, New York: 865–872.Google Scholar
  87. Nogrady, T., 1983. Succession of planktonic rotifer populations in some lakes of the Eastern Rift Valley, Kenya. Hydrobiologia 98: 45–54.Google Scholar
  88. Nogrady, T. & J. P. Stool, 1989. Rotifers from high arctic ponds (Cape Herschel, Ellesmere Island, N.W.T.). Hydrobiologia 173: 231–242.Google Scholar
  89. Palmer, M. A., 1990. Temporal and spatial dynamics of meiofauna within the hyporheic zone of Goose Creek, Virginia. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 9: 17–25.Google Scholar
  90. Pax, F. & K. Wulfert, 1941. Die Rotatorien deutscher Schwefelquellen und Thermen. Arch. Hydrobiol. 38: 165–213. 1942.Google Scholar
  91. Pax, F. & K. Wulfert, 1942. Die Rädertiere der deutschen Thermen. Lotos 88: 246–262.Google Scholar
  92. Pejler, B., 1957a. On variation and evolution in planktonic Rotatoria. Zool. Bidr. Upps. 32: 1–66.Google Scholar
  93. Pejler, B., 1957b. Taxonomical and ecological studies on planktonic Rotatoria from northern Swedish Lapland. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl., ser. 4, bd 6, no. 5, 68 pp.Google Scholar
  94. Pejler, B., 1957c. Studies on the taxonomy and ecology of planktonic Rotatoria. Thesis. Uppsala, 11 pp.Google Scholar
  95. Pejler, B., 1962. On the taxonomy and ecology of benthic and periphytic Rotatoria. Investigations in northern Swedish Lapland. Zool. Bidr. Upps. 33: 327–422.Google Scholar
  96. Pejler, B., 1965. Regional-ecological studies of Swedish fresh-water zooplankton. Zool. Bidr. Upps. 36: 407–515.Google Scholar
  97. Pejler, B., 1972. Rotifer plankton in brackish and freshwater localities in central Sweden. Oikos 23: 416–419.Google Scholar
  98. Pejler, B., 1980. Variation in the genus Keratella. Hydrobiologia 73 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 1): 207–213.Google Scholar
  99. Pejler, B., 1983. Zooplanktic indicators of trophy and their food. Hydrobiologia 101 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 13): 111–114.Google Scholar
  100. Pejler, B., 1993. Nordic Rotifera. Term Lists for Environmental Data Standardization. Nordic Code centre & Swedish Mus. Nat. Hist., 124 pp.Google Scholar
  101. Pejler, B. & B. Bērzinš, 1989. On choice of substrate and habitat in brachionid rotifers. Hydrobiologia 186/187 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 52): 137–144.Google Scholar
  102. Pejler, B. & B. Bērziš, 1993a. On choice of substrate and habitat in bdelloid rotifers. Hydrobiologia 255/256 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 83): 333–338.Google Scholar
  103. Pejler, B. & B. Bērzinš, 1993b. On relation to substrate in sessile rotifers. Hydrobiologia 259: 121–124.Google Scholar
  104. Pejler, B. & B. Bērzinš, 1993c. On the ecology of Cephalodella. Hydrobiologia 259: 125–128.Google Scholar
  105. Pejler, B. & B. Bērzinš, 1993d. On the ecology of Dicranophoridae (Rotifera). Hydrobiologia 259: 129–131.Google Scholar
  106. Pejler, B. & B. Bērzinš, 1993e. On the ecology of Trichocercidae (Rotifera). Hydrobiologia 263: 55–59.Google Scholar
  107. Pejler, B. & B. Bērzinš, 1993f. On the ecology of Colurellidae (Rotifera). Hydrobiologia 263: 61–64.Google Scholar
  108. Pejler, B. & B. Bērzinš, 1993g. On the ecology of mire rotifers. Limnologica 23: 295–300.Google Scholar
  109. Pejler, B. & B. Bērzinš, 1994. On the ecology of Lecane (Rotifera). Hydrobiologia 273: 77–80.Google Scholar
  110. Poinar, G. O. Jr & C. Ricci, 1992. Bdelloid rotifers in Dominican amber: Evidence for parthenogenetic continuity. Experientia 48: 408–410.Google Scholar
  111. Pontin, M., 1966. The osmoregulatory function of the vibratile flames and the contractile vesicle of Asplanchna. Comp. Biochem. Phys. 17: 1111–1126.Google Scholar
  112. Pontin, R. M., 1989. Opportunist rotifers: colonising species of young ponds in Surrey, England. Hydrobiologia 186/187: 229–234.Google Scholar
  113. Pontin, R. M. & J. M. Langley, 1993. The use of rotifer communities to provide a preliminary national classification of small water bodies in England. Hydrobiologia 255/256 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 83): 411–419.Google Scholar
  114. Pourriot, R., 1964. Étude expérimentale de variations morphologiques chez certaines espèces de rotifères. Bull. Soc. zool. Fr. 89: 555–561.Google Scholar
  115. Pourriot, R., 1974. Observations sur Abrochta intermedia de Beauchamp (Rotifere). Bull. mus. natn. Hist. nat., Paris, 3e sér., no 202, Zool. 132: 1–7.Google Scholar
  116. Pourriot, R., 1975. Relations prédateur-proie: Réactions adaptives et fluctuations des populations du zooplancton sous l'influence d'une prédation sélective. Ann. Biol. 14: 69–85.Google Scholar
  117. Pourriot, R., 1979. Rotifères du sol. Rev. Écol. Biol. Sol 16: 279–312.Google Scholar
  118. Pourriot, R., D. Benest, P. Champ & C. Rougier, 1982. Influence de quelques facteurs du milieu sur la composition et la dynamique saisonnière du zooplancton de la Loire. Acta Oecologica/Oecologia Generalis 3: 353–371.Google Scholar
  119. Pourriot, R. & M. Deluzarches, 1971. Recherches sur la biologie des Rotifères. II. Influence de la température sur la durée du développement embryonnaire et post-embryonnaire. Ann. Limnol. 7: 25–52.Google Scholar
  120. Pourriot, R., A. Iltis & S. Leveque-Duwat, 1967. Le plancton des mares natronées du Tchad. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 52: 535–543.Google Scholar
  121. Remane, A., 1929. Rotatoria. Tierw. Nord- u. Ostsee 7e, 156 pp.Google Scholar
  122. Remane, A. & C. Schlieper, 1971. Biology of brackish water. 2nd revised ed. Binnengewásser 25, 372 pp.Google Scholar
  123. Ricci, C., G. Melone & C. Sotgia, 1993. Old and new data on Seisonidea (Rotifera). Hydrobiologia 255/256 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 83): 495–511.Google Scholar
  124. Rodhe, W., 1949. The ionic composition of lake waters. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 10: 377–386.Google Scholar
  125. Ronneberger, D., 1975. Zur Kenntnis der Grundwasserfauna des Saale-Einzugsgebietes (Thüringen). Limnologica 9: 323–419.Google Scholar
  126. Rudesco, L., 1961. Rotiferii din Marea Neagra. Hidrobiologia, Acad. Rep. popul. Romine 3: 283–329. (Rumanian, with summaries in Russian and German.)Google Scholar
  127. Ruttner-Kolisko, A., 1953. Psammonstudien I. Das Psammon des Torneträsk in Schwedisch-Lappland. S.B. öst. Akad. Wiss., Math.-nat. KI., Abt. 1, 162: 129–161.Google Scholar
  128. Ruttner-Kolisko, A., 1954. Psammonstudien II. Das Psammon des Erken in Mittelschweden. S.B. öst. Akad. Wiss., Math.-nat. KI., Abt. 1, 163: 301–324.Google Scholar
  129. Ruttner-Kolisko, A., 1956. Der Lebensraum des Limnopsammals. Verh. deutsch. zool. Ges. Hamburg 1956: 421–427.Google Scholar
  130. Ruttner-Kolisko, A., 1971. Rotatorien als Indikatoren für den Chemismus von Binnensalzgewässern. S.B. öst. Akad. Wiss., Math.-nat. KI., Abt. 1, 179: 283–298.Google Scholar
  131. Ruttner-Kolisko, A., 1972. Der Einfluss von Temperatur und Salzgehaft des Mediums auf Stoffwechsel- und Vermehrungsintensität von Brachionus plicatilis (Rotatoria). Verh.-ber. deutsch. zool. Ges. 65: 89–95.Google Scholar
  132. Schmid-Araya, J. M., 1993a. Benthic rotifers inhabiting the bed sediments of a mountain gravel stream. Jber. Biol. Stn Lunz 14: 75–101.Google Scholar
  133. Schmid-Araya, J. M., 1993b. Spatial distribution and population dynamics of a benthic rotifer, Embata laticeps (Murray) (Rotifera, Bdelloidea) in the bed sediments of a gravel brook. Freshwat. Biol. 30: 395–408.Google Scholar
  134. Schmid-Araya, J. M., 1994. Spatial and temporal distribution of micro-meiofaunal groups in an alpine gravel stream. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 25.Google Scholar
  135. Shiel, R. J. & W. Koste, 1986. Australian Rotifera: Ecology and Biogeography. In P. DeDeckker & W. D. Williams (eds): Limnology in Australia, CSIRO (Junk): 141–150.Google Scholar
  136. Shiel, R. J., K. F. Walker & W. D. Williams, 1982. Plankton of the Lower River Murray, South Australia. Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 33: 301–327.Google Scholar
  137. Sládeček, V., 1977. Zum Verhältnis Saprobität: Trophie. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih., Ergebn. Limnol. 9: 79–93.Google Scholar
  138. Sládeček, V., 1983. Rotifers as indicators of water quality. Hydrobiologia 100: 169–201.Google Scholar
  139. Stemberger, R. S., 1988. Reproductive costs and hydrodynamic benefits of chemically induced defenses in Keratella testudo. Limnol. Oceanogr. 33: 593–606.Google Scholar
  140. Stemberger, R. S., 1990. Food limitation, spination, and reproduction in Brachionus calyciflorus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35: 33–44.Google Scholar
  141. Stemberger, R. S. & M. S. Evans, 1984. Rotifer seasonal succession and copepod predation in Lake Michigan. J. Great Lakes Res. 10: 417–428.Google Scholar
  142. Stemberger, R. S. & J. J. Gilbert, 1984. Spine development in the rotifer Keratella cochlearis: induction by cyclopoid copepods and Asplanchna. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 639–647.Google Scholar
  143. Strayer, D., 1985. The benthic micrometazoans of Mirror Lake, New Hampshire. Arch. Hydrobiol./Suppl. 72: 287–426.Google Scholar
  144. Stubbs, C. S., 1989. Patterns of distribution and abundance of corticolous lichens and their invertebrate associates on Quercus rubra in Maine. The Bryologist 92: 453–460.Google Scholar
  145. Thane-Fenchel, A., 1968a. Distribution and ecology of nonplanktonic brackish-water rotifers from Scandinavian waters. Ophelia 5: 273–297.Google Scholar
  146. Thane-Fenchel, A., 1968b. A simple key to the genera of marine and brackish-water rotifers. Ophelia 5: 299–311.Google Scholar
  147. Thienemann, A., 1920. Die Grundlagen der Biocoenotik. Festschr. f. Zschokke. No. 4. Basel, 14 pp.Google Scholar
  148. Tzschaschel, G., 1983 Seasonal abundance of psammon rotifers. Hydrobiologia 104 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 14): 275–278.Google Scholar
  149. Turner, P. N., 1990. Some interstitial Rotifera from a Florida, U.S.A., beach. Trans. am. Microsc. Soc. 109: 417–421.Google Scholar
  150. Turner, P. N., 1993. Distribution of rotifers in a Floridian saltwater beach, with a note on rotifer dispersal. Hydrobiologia 255/256 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 83): 435–439.Google Scholar
  151. Varga, L., 1954. Über die Lebensgemeinschaft einiger temporärer Tümpel auf einer Bergwiese im Börzönygebirge (Oberungarn). V. Rotatorien. Acta Biol., Acad. sci. Hung. 5: 347–356.Google Scholar
  152. Varga, L., 1957. Die Rotatorien und Gastrotrichen des Aszoföer Baches. Ann. Biol. Tihany 24: 155–164. (In Hungarian, with German summary.)Google Scholar
  153. Virro, T., 1993. Rotifers from Lake Yaskhan, Turkmenistan. Limnologica 23: 233–236.Google Scholar
  154. Vogel, S., 1981. Life in moving fluids. Willard Grant Press, Boston, 352 pp.Google Scholar
  155. Wallace, R. L., 1980. Ecology of sessile rotifers. Hydrobiologia 73 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 1): 181–193.Google Scholar
  156. Wallace, R. L. & W. T. Edmondson, 1986. Mechanism and adaptive significance of substrate selection by a sessile rotifer. Ecology 67: 314–323.Google Scholar
  157. Wallace, R. L. & T. W. Snell, 1991. Rotifera. In: Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. Academic Press, Inc: 187–248.Google Scholar
  158. Wesenberg-Lund, C., 1930. Contributions to the biology of the Rotifera. II. The periodicity and sexual periods. K. danske vidensk. Selsk., nat.-math. Afd., Raekke 9, Bd. 2, no. 1, 230 pp.Google Scholar
  159. Williams, D. D., 1987. The ecology of temporary waters. Croom Helm, Beckenham & N.S. Wales, 205 pp.Google Scholar
  160. Williams, L. G., 1966. Dominant planktonic rotifers of major waterways of the United States. Limnol. Oceanogr. 11: 83–91.Google Scholar
  161. Wiszniewski, J., 1937a. Der feuchte Sand als Lebensmilieu. Mikrokosmos 31: 34–38.Google Scholar
  162. Wiszniewski, J., 1937b. Différenciation écologique des Rotifères dans le psammon d'eaux douces. Ann. mus. zool. polon. 13: 1–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Birger Pejler
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of LimnologyUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations