Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 110, Issue 1, pp 79–90 | Cite as

Permanent swamp vegetation of the Upper Nile

  • Patrick Denny
Article

Abstract

This paper describes vegetation in the nothern Sudd area of the Sudan. A visit by boat was made in April 1978 along the White Nile from Malakal to Lake No; to the inflow regions of the Bahr el Jebel, the Bahr el Zeraf and to the Bahr el Ghazal. Only the vegetation along the fringe of the rivers was observed as plants were tall and dense and it was not possible to penetrate into the inner swamps.

The outer edge of the vegetation was fringed by extensive mats of free-floating Eichhornia crassipes which was easily dislodged and formed floating islands to be carried downstream. The main rivers, excluding the Bahr el Ghazal, were too deep and turbid to support beds of submerged species but plants such as Ceratophyllum demersum could be found amongst floating plants.

Vossia cuspidata usually produced a broad zone to the landward of Eichhornia. It dominated the shallow water with a floating raft of stems growing out from the shore over the water surface. Massive stands of Cyperus papyrus and/or Phragmites karka, over 5 metres tall, dominated the vegetation behind and sometimes excluded the Vossia zone. The papyrus could form dense, floating rafts of rhizomes at the water's edge, but Phragmites always remained firmly rooted to the bottom. Floating papyrus and Vossia would become detached from the main beds and drifted downstream with Eichhornia.

Creepers were common amongst papyrus but less common amongst Phragmites where the vegetation was generally more dense. Large stands of Typa domingensis were observed behind the fringe vegetation.

The vegetation of the Bahr el Ghazal, in marked contrast to the rest, was stunted, and reasons for this are suggested. Species diversity was greater and the less turbid waters allowed considerable development of floating-leaved and submerged species.

Estimates of fresh weights and heights of dominant vegetation types were attained but methods were very laborious and alternative ways have been suggested. The fresh weight of Eichhornia from a one metre square quadrat in the White Nile was around 70 kg. The shoots of Phragmites weighed 18.5 kg and Cyperus papyrus, 11.0 kg m−2.

Keywords

Sudan swamp vegetation Sudd 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bishai, H. M., 1962. The water characteristics of the Nile in the Sudan with a note on the effect of Eichhornia crassipes on the hydrobiology of the Nile. Hydrobiologia 19: 357–382.Google Scholar
  2. Carter, G. S., 1955. The Papyrus Swamps of Uganda. Heffer, Cambridge, 25 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Denny, P., 1973. Lakes of south-western Uganda. II. Vegetation studies on Lake Bunyonyi. Freshwater Biology 3: 123–135.Google Scholar
  4. E.N.P., 1954. The Equatorial Nile Project. Being the report of the Jonglei Investigation Team. Sudan Government, London.Google Scholar
  5. Euroconsult, 1976. Jonglei Structures, Phase 1. Kingdom of the Netherlands, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Arnhem.Google Scholar
  6. Euroconsult, 1977. Jonglei Environmental Aspects (draft). Kingdom of the Netherlands, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Arnhem.Google Scholar
  7. Gaudet, J. J., 1977. Natural drawdown on Lake Naivasha, Kenya, and the formation of papyrus swamps. Aquat. Bot. 3: 1–47.Google Scholar
  8. Gay, P. A., 1958. Eichhornia crassipes in the Nile of the Sudan. Nature (Lond.) 182: 538–539.Google Scholar
  9. Gronblad, R., Prowse, G. A. & Scott, A. M., 1958. Sudanese Desmids. Acta Botanica Fennica 58: 3–82.Google Scholar
  10. Luond, A., 1980. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus upon the growth of some Lemnaceae. In: E. Landolt (ed.), Biosystematische Untersuchungen in der Familie der Wasserlinsen (Lemnaceae). Veroffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes der ETH, Stiftung Rubel, Zurich, pp. 119–141.Google Scholar
  11. Migahid, A. M., 1948. Report on a Botanical Excursion to the Sudd Region. I. First excursion 1946. Fouad I University Press, Cairo.Google Scholar
  12. Renvoize, S. A., Lock, J. M. & Denny, P., in press. A remarkable new grass genus from the Southern Sudan. Kew Bulletin.Google Scholar
  13. Rzóska, J., 1974. The Upper Nile swamps, a tropical wetland study. Freshwat. Biol. 4: 1–30.Google Scholar
  14. Rzóska, J., 1976. The Nile. Biology of an ancient river. W. Junk, The Hague, The Netherlands, 417 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Sutcliffe, J. V., 1974. A hydrological study of the southern Sudd region of the Upper Nile. Hydr. Sc. Bull. 19: 237–255.Google Scholar
  16. Talling, J. F., 1957. The longitudinal succession of water characteristics in the White Nile. Hydrobiologia 11: 73–89.Google Scholar
  17. Thompson, K., 1976. Swamp development in the head waters of the White Nile. In: J. Rzoska (ed.), Te Nile. Biology of an ancient river. W. Junk, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 177–196.Google Scholar
  18. Thompson, K., Shewry, P. R. & Woolhouse, H. W., 1979. Papyrus swamp development in the Upemba Basin, Zaire: studies of population structure in Cyperus papyrus stands. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 78: 299–316.Google Scholar
  19. UNEP/FAO, 1977. Technical Report 1. (AG: DP/SUD/71/553). The Sudan. Multitemporal landsat-imagery interpretation of the flood region draining to the Sudd. Rome.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Denny
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biology, Westfield CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonU.K.

Personalised recommendations