Five parents from each of four race groups of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) were hybridized to produce five crosses within each group. Also, five crosses were made for each of the six possible combinations among four groups. Parents, F1 and F2, and parents, F2 and F3 were evaluated for seed yield in 1990 and 1991, respecitively, at two locations in Colombia.
Yield of parents belonging to Middle American races and crosses among them was higher than that of races of Andean origin. Positive correlations were found among the mid-parent value, F1, F2 and F3. Also, the mid-parent value predicted the mean seed yield of all possible lines that could be derived from the F∞-generation in 42 out of 47 crosses. Four crosses, all between common bean races of Andean and Middle American origin, indicated a possible loss of favorable epistatic parental alleles. On average, mean yield of interracial F1 hybrids was higher than that of intraracial ones.
Positive heteroris (26.4%–123.8%) over the mid-parent in 31 crosses, and F1s yielding higher (23.7%–91.8%) than the high parent in 20 crosses and yielding higher (22.1%–53.2%) than the highest control among all parents (MAM 13) in 12 crosses, were found. Heritability, estimated by the parent-offspring regression, ranged from 0.42± 0.07 to 0.49±0.04. Expected and realized gains from selection (at 20% selection pressure) ranged from 10.3% to 21.0% over the mean of F1 hybrids and F2 and F3 population bulks.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Bannerot H., 1989. The potential of hybrid beans, pp. 111–134. In: S.Beebe (Ed). Current Topics in Breeding of Common Bean. Working Document 47. CIAT, Cali, Colombia.
Beaver J.S. & J.D.Kelly, 1994. Comparison of selection methods for dry bean populations derived from crosses between gene pools. Crop Sci. 34: 34–37.
Frey K.J. & T.Horner, 1955. Comparison of actual and predicted gains in barley selection experiments. Agron. J. 47: 186–188.
Gallais A., 1979. Le concept de valuer en lignées d'un génotype et son utilisation possible en sélection. Ann. Amélior. Plantes 29: 1–22.
Gepts P., 1988. A Middle American and an Andean common bean gene pool. pp. 375–390. In: P.Gepts (Ed). Genetic Resources of Phaseolus Beans. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Gepts P. & F.A.Bliss, 1985. F1 hybrid weakness in the common bean: differential geographic origin suggests two gene pools in cultivated bean germplams. J. Hered. 76: 447–450.
Ghaderi A., M.W.Adams & A.M.Nassib, 1984. Relationship between genetic distance and heterosis for yield and morphological traits in dry edible bean and faba bean. Crop Sci. 24: 37–42.
Gutiérrez J.A. & S.P.Singh, 1985. Heterosis and inbreeding depression in dry bush beans, Phaseolus vulgaris L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65: 243–249.
Hamblin J. & A.M.Evans, 1976. The estimation of cross yield using early generation and parental yields in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica 25: 515–520.
Khairallah M.M., M.W.Adams & B.B.Sears, 1990. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms of Malawian bean lines: further evidence for two major gene pools. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 753–761.
Koenig R.L. & P.Gepts, 1989. Segregation and linkage of genes for seed protein, isozymes, and morphological traits in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). J. Hered. 80: 455–459.
Kornegay J. & C.Cardona, 1990. Development of an appropriate breeding scheme for tolerance to Empoasca kraemeri in common bean. Euphytica 47: 223–231.
Kornegay J., J.W.White & O.Ortiz de la Cruz, 1992. Growth habit and gene pool effects on inheritance of yield in common bean. Euphytica 62: 171–180.
Nienhuis J. & S.P.Singh, 1988. Combining ability analyses and relationships among yield, yield components, and architectural traits in dry bean. Crop Sci. 26: 21–27.
Nienhuis J. & S.P.Singh, 1988. Genetics of seed yield and its components in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of Middle-American origin. II. Genetic variance, heritability and expected response from selection. Plant Breed. 101: 155–163.
Quiñones F.A., 1969. Relationships between parents and selections in crosses of dry beans, Phaseolus vulgaris. Crop Sci. 9: 673–675.
Sarrafi A. & R.Ecochard, 1986. Modification of heterosis for protein and yield components by bean common mosaic virus in Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Breed. 97: 279–282.
Schnell F.W. & C.C.Cockerham, 1992. Multiplicative vs. arbitrary gene action in heterosis. Genetics 131: 461–469.
Shii C.T., M.C.Mok, S.R.Temple & D.W.S.Mok, 1980. Expression of developmental abnormalities in hybrids of Phaseolus vulgaris L.: interaction between temperature and allelic dosage. J. Hered. 71: 218–222.
Singh S.P., 1989. Patterns of variation in cultivated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ. Bot. 43: 39–57.
Singh S.P., 1992. Common bean improvement in the tropics. Plant Breed. Rev. 10: 199–269.
Singh S.P., 1994. Gamete selection for simultaneous improvement of multiple traits in common bean. Crop Sci. 34: 352–355.
Singh S.P., 1995. Selection for water-stress tolerance in interracial populations of common bean. Crop Sci. 35: 118–124.
Singh S.P., C.Cajiao, J.A.Gutiérrez, J.García, M.A.Pastor Corrales & F.J.Morales, 1989. Selection for seed yield in inter-gene pool crosses of common bean. Crop Sci. 29: 1126–1131.
Singh S.P., P.Gepts & D.G.Debouck, 1991a. Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ. Bot. 45: 379–396.
Singh S.P. & J.A.Gutiérrez, 1984. Geographical distribution of DL 1 and DL 2 genes causing hybrid dwarfism in Phaseolus vulgaris L., their association with seed size, and their significance to breeding. Euphytica 33: 337–345.
Singh S.P., J.A.Gutiérrez, A.Molina, C.Urrea & P.Gepts, 1991b. Genetic diversity in cultivated common bean. II. Marker-based analysis of morphological and agronomic traits. Crop Sci. 31: 23–29.
Singh S.P., R.Lépiz, J.A.Gutiérrez, C.Urrea, A.Molina & H.Terán, 1990. Yield testing of early generation populations of common bean. Crop Sci. 30: 874–878.
Singh S.P., A.Molina, C.A.Urrea & J.A.Gutiérrez, 1993. Use of interracial hybridization in breeding the race Durango common bean. Can. J. Plant Sci. 73: 785–793.
Singh S.P., H.Terán, A.Molina & J.A.Gutiérrez, 1991c. Genetics of seed yield and its components in common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of Andean origin. Plant Breed. 107: 254–257.
Smith J.D. & M.L.Kinman, 1965. The use of parent-offspring regression as an estimator of heritability. Crop Sci. 5: 595–596.
White J.W. & A.González, 1990. Characterization of the negative association between seed yield and seed size among genotypes of common bean. Field Crops Res. 23: 159–175.
White J.W., S.P.Singh, C.Pino, M.J.Rios & I.Buddenhagen, 1992. Effects of seed size and photoperiod response on crop growth and yield of common bean. Field Crops Res. 28: 295–307.
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, S.P., Urrea, C.A. Inter-and intraracial hybridization and selection for seed yield in early generations of common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L.. Euphytica 81, 131–137 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025424
- common bean
- early generation yield test
- gains from selection
- inter-and intraracial hybrids
- Phaseolus vulgaris