Abstract
Western red cedar (Thuja plicata Donn) seedlings were grown in a greenhouse and subjected to six nursery cultural treatments (long-day wet (LDW), long-day moderate (LDM), long-day dry (LDD), short-day wet (SDW), short-day moderate (SDM), and short-day dry (SDD)) during mid-summer. Seedling attributes were measured before fall and spring planting.
Short-day and moisture stress treatments reduced shoot but not root growth, resulting in reduced shoot to root ratios. Fall tested LDW seedlings had a higher osmotic potential at saturation and turgor loss point than other treatments. Fall tested short-day seedlings had lower resistance to plant water movement. The LDW seedlings had the greatest new root growth in fall testing, while one of the lowest in spring testing. In the fall, LDW seedlings had the greatest net photosynthesis (Pn) at 25 °C root temperature, with all treatments having a similar decline in Pn as root temperatures decreased to 1 °C. In the spring, all treatments had a similar decline in Pn with decreasing predawn shoot water potential. Moisture stress and short-day nursery cultural treatments applied in mid-summer will not harden western red cedar seedlings for all potential field conditions.
Spring, compared to fall, tested seedlings had two times the shoot and three times the root dry weight. Spring tested seedlings had a lower osmotic potential, maximum modulus of elasticity, relative water content at turgor loss point and greater dry weight fraction. Fall, compared to spring, tested seedlings had lower resistance to plant water movement and greater cuticular transpiration. In general, fall tested seedlings had more root growth than spring tested seedlings. Spring, compared to fall, tested seedlings generally had greater stress resistance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams M. D. 1988. Sources of variation in osmotic potentials with special reference to North American tree species. Forest Sci. 34: 1030–1046.
Arnott, J. T., Grossnickle, S. C., Puttonen, P., Mitchell, A. K. and Folk, R. S. 1993. Influence of nursery culture on growth, cold hardiness and drought resistance of yellow cypress. Can. J. For. Res. (accepted for publication).
Burdett A. N. 1983. Quality control in production of forest planting stock. For. Chron. 59: 132–138.
Burr K. E., Tinus R. W., Wallner S. J. and King R. M. 1989. Relationships among cold hardiness, root growth potential and bud dormancy in three conifers. Tree Physiol. 5: 291–306.
Cannell M. G. R., Tabbush P. M., Deans J. D., Hollingsworth M. K., Sheppard L. J., Philipson J. J. and Murray M. B. 1990. Sitka spruce and Douglas-fir seedlings in nursery and in cold storage: root growth potential, carbohydrate content, dormancy, frost hardiness and mitotic index. Forestry, 63: 9–27.
Colombo S. J. and Asselstine M. F. 1989. Root hydraulic conductivity of black spruce container seedlings. Tree Physiol. 5: 73–81.
Curran, M. P. and Dunsworth, B. G. 1988. Coastal western red cedar regeneration: problems and potentials, pp. 20–32. In: Smith, N. J. (Ed.) Western Red Cedar — Does it Have a Future? Conference Proceedings, University of British Columbia, Faculty of Forestry.
DeLucia E. H. 1986. Effects of low root temperature on net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and carbohydrate concentration in Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.) seedlings. Tree Physiol. 2: 143–154.
Duryea M. L. 1984. Nursery cultural practices: Impacts on seedling quality, pp. 143–164. In: Duryea M. L. and Landis L. D. (Eds.) Forest Nursery Manual: Production of Bareroot Seedlings. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.
Duryea M. L. 1985. Evaluating seedling quality: importance to reforestation, pp. 1–6. In: Duryea M. L. (Ed.) Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures and Predictive Abilities of Major Tests. Oregon State University, Forest Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR.
Folk R. S., Grossnickle S. C., Major J. E. and Arnott J. T. 1994. Influence of nursery culture on western red cedar. II. Freezing tolerance and morphological development of fall- and spring-planted seedlings. New For. 8: 231–247.
Grossnickle S. C. 1988. Planting stress in newly planted jack pine and white spruce seedlings. 1. Factors influencing water uptake. Tree Physiol. 4: 71–83.
Grossnickle S. C. 1989. Shoot phenology and water relations of Picea glauca. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 1287–1290.
Grossnickle S. C. 1992. Relationship between freezing tolerance and shoot water relations of western red cedar. Tree Physiol. 11: 229–240.
Grossnickle S. C. 1993. Shoot water relations and gas exchange of western hemlock and western red cedar seedlings during establishment on a reforestation site. Trees, 7: 148–155.
Grossnickle S. C. and Blake T. J. 1985. Acclimation of cold-stored jack pine and white spruce seedlings: effect of soil temperature on water relation patterns. Can. J. For. Res. 15: 544–550.
Grossnickle S. C. and Russell J. H. 1990. Water movement in yellow-cedar seedlings and rooted cuttings: comparison of whole plant and root system pressurization methods. Tree Physiol. 6: 57–68.
Grossnickle S. C. and Russell J. H. 1991. Gas exchange processes of yellow-cedar (Chamaecyparis nottkatensis (D.Don) Spach) in response to environmental variables. Can. J. Bot. 69: 2684–2691.
Grossnickle, S. C., Arnott, J. T. and Major, J. E. 1988. A comparison of stock quality test for nursery seedlings. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-167, pp. 77–88.
Grossnickle S. C., Arnott J. T., Major J. E. and Tschaplinski T. J. 1991. Influence of dormancy induction treatments on western hemlock seedlings. I. Seedling development and stock quality assessment. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 164–174.
Grossnickle S. C., Major J. E., Arnott J. T. and LeMay V. M. 1991b. Stock quality assessment through an integrated approach. New For. 5: 77–91.
Hinckley, T. M., Lassoie, J. P. and Running, S. W. 1978. Temporal and spatial variations in the water status of forest trees. For. Sci. Monogr. No. 20.
Hinckley T. M., Duhme F., Hinckley A. R. and Richter H. 1980. Water relations of drought hardy shrubs: osmotic potential and stomatal reactivity. Plant, Cell and Environ. 3: 131–140.
Kandiko R. A., Timmis R. and Worrall J. 1980. Pressure-volume curves of shoots and roots of normal and drought conditioned western hemlock seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 10: 10–16.
Kleinbaum D. G., Kupper L. L., and Muller K. E. 1988. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. 2nd ed. PWS-Kent Publishing Co., Boston, 718 p.
Krasowski M. J. and Owens J. N. 1991. Growth and morphology of western red cedar seedlings as affected by photoperiod and moisture stress. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 340–352.
Kwon K. W. and Pallardy S. G. 1989. Temporal changes in tissue water relations of seedlings of Quercus acutissima, Q. alba, and A. stellata subjected to chronic water stress. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 622–626.
Lopushinsky, W. and Beebe, T. 1976. Relationship of shoot-root ratio to survival and growth of outplanted Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine seedlings. USDA For. Ser. Res. Note PNW-274.
Ludlow M. M. 1989. Strategies of response to water stress, pp. 269–281. In: Kreeb K. H., Richter H. and Hinckley T. M. (Eds.) Structural and Functional Responses to Environmental Stresses. Academic Publishing, The Hague.
Major, J. E. 1990. Ecophysiological assessment of western hemlock and western red cedar. M.Sc. Thesis. Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 163 p.
Mattsson A. 1986. Seasonal variation in root growth capacity during cultivation of container grown Pinus sylvestris seedlings. Scand. J. For. Res. 1: 473–482.
McCracken I. J. 1978. Carbon dioxide uptake of pine seedlings after cool storage. Forest Sci. 24: 17–25.
Miller, D. L. 1981. Can we fall plant Douglas-fir? Potlatch Forestry Research Note. RN-81-7.
Miller, D. L. 1982. Can we fall plant Engelmann spruce and western red cedar? Potlatch Forestry Research Note. RN-82-1.
Mitchell W. K., Dunsworth G., Simpson D. G. and Vyse A. 1990. Planting and seeding, pp. 235–253. In: Lavender D. P., Parish R., Johnson C. M., Montgomery G., Vyse A., Willis R. A. and Winston D. (Eds.) Regenerating British Columbia's Forests. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, B.C.
Oquist G. 1983. Effects of low temperature on photosynthesis. Plant, Cell and Environ. 6: 281–300.
Ritchie G. A. and Dunlap J. R. 1980. Root growth potential: Its development and expression in forest tree seedlings. N.Z.J. For. Sci. 10: 218–248.
Ritchie, G. A. and Tanaka, Y. 1990. Root growth potential and target seedling, pp. 37–51. In: Rose, R., Campbell, S. J. and Landis, T. D. (Eds.) Target Seedling Symposium. Gen. Tech. Rep. Rm-200.
Ritchie G. A., Roden J. R. and Kleyn N. 1985. Physiological quality of lodgepole pine and interior spruce seedlings: effects of lift date and duration of freezer storage. Can. J. For. Res. 15: 636–645.
Robichaux R. H., Holsinger K. E. and Morse S.R. 1986. Turgor maintenance in Hawaiian Dubautia species: the role of variation in tissue osmotic and elastic properties, pp. 353–380. In: Givnish T. J. (Ed.) On the Economy of Plant Form and Function. Camebridge Univ. Press, New York.
Rose R. 1992. Seedling handling and planting, pp. 328–344. In: Hobbs S. D., Tesch S. D., Owston P. W., Stewart R. E., Tappeiner J. C. and Wells G. E. (Eds.) Reforestation Practices in Southwestern Oregon and Northern California. Oregon State University, Forest Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR.
Rowan, S. J. 1987. Nursery seedling quality affects growth and survival in outplantings. Georgia For. Res. Paper No. 70. 14 p.
Schulte P. J. and Hinckley T. M. 1985. A comparison of pressure-volume curve data analysis techniques. J. Exp. Bot. 36: 1590–1602.
Seiler J. R. and Johnson J. D. 1985. Photosynthesis and transpiration of loblolly pine seedlings as influenced by moisture-stress conditioning. Forest Sci. 31: 742–749.
Steel R. G. D. and Torrie J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York. 633 p.
Tinus, R. W. and McDonald, S. E. 1979. How to grow tree seedlings in containers in greenhouses. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-60, 256 pp.
Thompson B. E. 1985. Seedling morphological evaluation-what you can tell by looking, pp. 59–72. In: Duryea M. L. (Ed.) Evaluating seedling quality: principles, procedures and predictive abilities of major test. Oregon State University, Forest Research Laboratory, Corvallis.
Vanhinsberg N. B. and Colombo S. J. 1990. Effect of temperature on needle anatomy and transpiration of Picea mariana after bud initiation. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 598–601.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Major, J.E., Grossnickle, S.C., Folk, R.S. et al. Influence of nursery culture on western red cedar. New Forest 8, 211–229 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025369
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025369