Skip to main content
Log in

The role of mutations in intraspecific differentiation of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Based on morphological diversity, cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is classified into two subspecies (fastigiata and hypogaea) and further into four botanical types (Spanish bunch, Valencia, Virginia bunch and Virginia runner). In a cross between two Spanish cultivars belonging to ssp. fastigiata, a true breeding variant (Dharwad early runner) sharing some characters of both the subspecies was isolated. The variant, on mutagenesis with ethyl methane sulphonate (EMS) yielded a very high frequency of mutants resembling all four botanical types. Some of the mutants produced germinal reversions to Dharwad early runner in later generations indicating genetic instability. While most of the revertants bred true, some of the mutants continued to segregate, wherein each botanical group of mutants produced all other botanical types. A detailed analysis of the breeding behaviour of mutants revealed several unusual features (such as homozygous mutations, mutation outbursts, segregation distortions, somatic mutations and multiple character mutations) that could not be explained through conventional mutation theory. In the light of these findings, the role of mutations in evolutionary differentiation of the crop and the probable mode of their origin have been discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashri, A., 1972. Mutations and physiological reaction to several chemical mutagens in peanuts, Arachis hypogaea. In. Proc. FAO/IAEA, pp. 253–264. Latin American study group on induced mutations and plant improvements, Bs. Aires, Argentina 16–20. Nov. 1970. Vienna, Austria.

  • Burr, B. & F.A. Burr, 1981. Transposable elements and genetic instabilities in crop plants. Stadler Symp. 13: 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B., P. Sniegowski & W. Stephan, 1994. The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature 371: 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebley, J.F. & J.F. Wendel, 1989. Application of RFLP's to plant systematics. In: To Helientiaris & B. Burr (Eds). Current communications in molecular biology-development and application of molecular markers to problems in plant genetics. pp. 57–68. CSH Lab., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, R. W., A.H. Bunting & J. Smartt, 1972. The classification of varieties of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 21: 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, L.D., 1984. Genetics and morphological evolution in plants. Am. Nat. 123: 681–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowda, M.V.C., H.L. Nadaf & K. Giriraj, 1989. A new growth habit variant of taxonomical importance in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Int. Arachis Newslett. 6: 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowda, M.V.C. & H.L. Nadaf, 1992. Induced mutants of taxonomical importance in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Int. Arachis Newslett. 12: 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M.M., 1988. Mobile DNA elements and spontaneous gene mutation: In: Eukaryotic transposable elements as mutagenic agents. Banbury Report 30: 41–50. CSH Lab., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W.C., A. Krapovickas & M.P. Gregory, 1980. Structure, variation, evolution and classification in Arachis. In: R.J. Summerfield & A.H. Bunting (Eds). Advances in Legume Science. pp. 469. Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halward, T.M., H.T. Stalker, E.A. Larue & G. Kochert, 1991. Genetic variation detectable with molecular markers among unadapted germplasm resources of cultivated peanut and related wild species. Genome 34: 1013–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilu, K.W., 1983. The role of single gene mutations in the evolution of flowering plants. Evol. Biol. 26: 97–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted, L., 1936. Cytological studies on the peanut, Arachis II. Chromosome number, morphology, behaviour and their application to the problem of the origin of the cultivated forms. Cytologia 7: 396–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochert, G., T. Halward, W.D. Branch & C.E. Simpson, 1991. RFLP variability in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars and wild species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81: 565–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapovickas, A., 1968. The origin, variability and spread of the groundnut (Arachis hypogaea). In: P.J. Ueko & J.S. Falk (Eds). The domestication and exploitation of plants and animals. pp. 427–441. Greald Duckworth Co. Ltd. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapovickas, A., 1973. Evolution of the genus Arachis. In: R. Moav (Ed). Agricultural Genetics-Selected Topics. pp. 135–151 John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, P.J., S.L.A. Payan, R.T.S. Bretell & W.R. Scowcroft, 1984. Heritable somaclonal variation in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 67: 443–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, J.K., 1979. Site-specific instability in D. melanogaster; The origin of the mutation and cytogenetic evidence for site specificity. Genetics 93: 681.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, B., 1978. Mechanisms that rapidly reorganize the genome. Stadler Symp. 10: 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouli, C., D.M. Kale & S.H. Patil, 1979. Sequential flowering large pod Trombay groundnuts (Abst.). In: Symposium on the Role of Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement. pp. 27. Hyderabad, India.

  • Nevers, P., N.S. Shepherd & H. Saedler, 1986. Plant transposable elements. Adv. Bot. Res. 12: 103–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norden, A.J., 1973. Breeding of the cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). In: (Symp.) Peanuts-Culture and Uses. pp. 175–208. American Peanut Research and Education Association, Oklahoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil, S.H., 1966. Mutations induced in groundnut by X-rays. Indian J. Genet. 26 A: 485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, M.V.R., 1989. Genetic differentiation in Arachis hypogaea L. In: S.A. Farook & I.A. Khan (eds). Recent Advances in Genetics and Cytogenetics. pp. 53–55. Premier Publishing House, Hyderabad, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qui, Q.S., W. Hu & F. Shen, 1994. Mutation breeding in China: Achievements and prospects in groundnut. Int. Arachis Newslett. 14: 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A.K., 1986a. Utilization of wild relatives in the genetic improvement of Arachis hypogaea L. 7. Autotetraploid production and prospects in interspecific breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 72: 164–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A.K., 1986b. Utilization of wild relatives in the genetic improvemet of Arachis hypogaea L. 8. Synthetic amphidiploids and their importance in interspecific breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 72: 433–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A.K., 1988. Putative genome donors of Arachis hypogaea (Fabaceae); evidence from crosses with synthetic amphidiploids. Pl. Syst. Evol. 160: 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A.K. & J.P. Moss, 1984. Utilization of wild relatives in the genetic improvement of Arachis hypogaea L. 5. Genome analysis in section Arachis and its implications in gene transfer. Theor. Appl. Genet. 68: 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartt, J., 1960. Genetic instability and out-crossing in groundnut variety manipintar. Nature 186: 1070–1071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartt, J., W.C. Gregory & M.P. Gregory, 1978a. The genomes of Arachis hypogaea L. I. Cytogenetic studies of putative genome donors. Euphytica 27: 665–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartt, J., W.C. Gregory & M.P. Gregory, 1978b. The genomes of Arachis hypogaea L. II. The implications in interspecific breeding. Euphytica 27: 677–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartt, J., 1990. Grain legumes-evolution and genetic resources. pp. 30–84. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalker, H.T., 1982. Cytological relationship among varieties of Arachis hypogaea L. Proc. Am. Peanut Res., Educ. Soc. 14: 72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalker, H.T., J.S. Dhesi, D.C. Parry & J.H. Hahn, 1991. Cytological and interfertility relationships of Arachis, section Arachis. Amer. J. Bot. 78: 238–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessler, S.R., 1988. Phenotypic diversity mediated by the maize transposable elements Ac and SPm. Science 249: 399–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, J.C. & T.A. Coffelt, 1982. Genetics of Arachis hypogaea L. In: H.E. Pattee & C.T. Young (Eds). Peanut Science and Technology. pp. 50–94. APRES, Yoakum/Ty.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gowda, M.V.C., Nadaf, H.L. & Sheshagiri, R. The role of mutations in intraspecific differentiation of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 90, 105–113 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025166

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025166

Key words

Navigation