Skip to main content
Log in

Smut reaction of pearl millet hybrids affected by fertility restoration and genetic resistance of parental lines

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) hybrids based on the A1 cytoplasmic-nuclear male-sterile (CMS) lines are more susceptible to smut (Tolyposporium penicillariae Bref.) than open-pollinated varieties. Seventy eight pairs of hybrids, made onto male-sterile (A) lines and their counterpart maintainer (B) lines, were evaluated to examine the effects of male sterility and genetic resistance of parental lines on the smut severity of hybrids. The A-line hybrids had higher smut severity and lower selfed seedset than the counterpart B-line hybrids, indicating that it is the CMS-mediated male sterility rather than the A1 cytoplasm per se that caused greater smut severity of A-line hybrids. However, with the use of resistant parental lines even male-sterile hybrids of A-lines, in several cases, were as resistant as some of the highly resistant male-fertile hybrids of B-lines. It would be possible to produce smut resistant hybrids (< 10% severity) on A-lines, albeit in low frequency, even if only one parent of a hybrid were resistant. However, the probability of producing such hybrids would be higher when both parents were resistant to smut. Thus, improvement in smut resistance of parental lines and fertility restoration ability of pollinators would provide the most effective genetic approach to smut disease management in hybrids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anand Kumar, K., R.P. Jain & S.D. Singh, 1983. Downy mildew reactions of pearl millet lines with and without cytoplasmic male sterility. Plant Dis. 67: 663–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavan, S.B., R.P. Thakur & K.P. Rao, 1988. Inheritance of smut resistance in pearl millet. Pl. Dis. Res. 3: 192–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney, D.J., 1989. Was this in your statistics textbook? V. Transformation of data. Expl. Agric. 25: 165–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genstat Release 4.04, 1986. Lawes Agricultural Trust-Rothamsted Experimental Station, UK.

  • Natarajan, U.S., V.B. Guruswamy Raja, S. Selvaraj & C. Parambaramani, 1974. Grain loss due to ergot disease in bajra hybrids. Indian Phytopath. 27: 254–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachie, K.O. & J.V. Majmudar, 1980. Pearl Millet. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park and London. 307 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safeeulla, K.M., 1977. Genetic vulnerability. The basis of recent epidemics in India. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 287: 72–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheifele, G.L., W. Whitehead & C. Rowe, 1970. Increased susceptibility to southern leaf spot (Helminthosporium maydis) in inbred lines and hybrids of maize with Texas male-sterile cytoplasm. Plant Dis. Rep. 54: 501–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R.P., 1989. Flowering events in relation to smut susceptibility in pearl millet. Plant Pathol. 38: 557–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R.P. & S.B. King, 1988. Smut disease of pearl millet. Information Bulletin no. 25. Patancheru, A.P. 502 324, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R.P., S.B. King, K.N. Rai & V.P. Rao, 1992. Identification and utilization of smut resistance in pearl millet. Research Bulletin no. 16. Patancheru, A.P. 502 324, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R.P., S.B. King & V.P. Rao, 1989a. Expression of ergot resistance in pearl millet under artificially induced epidemic conditions. Phytopathology 79: 1323–1326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R.P., V.P. Rao & S.B. King, 1989b. Ergot susceptibility in relation to cytoplasmic male sterility in pearl millet. Plant Dis. 73: 676–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R.P., K.V. Subba Rao & R.J. Williams, 1983. Effects of pollination on smut development in pearl millet. Plant Pathol. 32: 141–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R.P. & R.J. Williams, 1980. Pollination effects on pearl millet ergot. Phytopathology 70: 80–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, H.D., W.W. Hanna & G.W. Burton, 1987. Effects of inoculation and pollination on smut development in near-isogenic lines of pearl millet. Phytopathology 77: 293–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, O.P., I.S. Khairwal & S. Singh, 1992. Smut severity of pearl millet hybrids with male sterile and fertile cytoplasm. Euphytica 64: 139–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, O.P., V.K. Manga & G.K. Gupta, 1993. Influence of A1 cytoplasmic substitution on the downy mildew incidence of pearl millet. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87: 558–560.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Submitted as JA No 1737 by the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rai, K.N., Thakur, R.P. Smut reaction of pearl millet hybrids affected by fertility restoration and genetic resistance of parental lines. Euphytica 90, 31–37 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025157

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025157

Key words

Navigation