Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of mechanically-induced stress and plant growth regulators on the growth of lettuce, cauliflower and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants

  • Published:
Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The plant growth regulators, gibberellic acid (GA3), ethephon and chlormequat chloride (CCC) were sprayed on young lettuce, cauliflower and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants, which had either been given or not been given a mechanically-induced stress (MIS) treatment. MIS was applied by brushing the plants with paper for 1.5 minutes each day. GA3 increased extension growth of bean and leaf length of lettuce in unbrushed plants as much as in brushed ones. CCC and ethephon were less effective at reducing the height of brushed bean plants compared to unbrushed ones. The effects of CCC on the growth of cauliflower and lettuce plants was not influenced by brushing, whereas unbrushed plants responded more readily to ethephon than did brushed ones. The effects of CCC on growth were generally similar to those of MIS whereas the effects of ethephon were in many ways different to MIS.

The results are discussed in relation to the use of PGR and MIS treatments for modifying plant growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beyl CA and Mitchell CA (1977) Characterisation of mechanical stress in dwarfing chrysanthemum. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 102: 591–594

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beyl CA and Mitchell CA (1983) Alteration of growth, exudation rate and endogenous hormone profiles in mechanically-dwarfed sunflower. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 108: 257–262

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biddington NL and Dearman AS (1985) The effect of mechanically-induced stress on the growth of cauliflower, lettuce and celery seedlings. Ann Bot 55: 109–119

    Google Scholar 

  4. Biddington NL and Dearman AS (1986) A comparison of the effects of mechanically-induced stress, ethephon and silver thiosulphate on the growth of cauliflower seedlings. Plant Growth Reg 4: 33–44

    Google Scholar 

  5. Biddington NL and Dearman AS (1987) The effects of mechanically-induced stress on the growth of water and nutrient-deficient lettuce and cauliflower seedlings. Ann Bot 59: 679–683

    Google Scholar 

  6. Biro RL and Jaffe MJ (1984) Thigmomorphogenesis: Ethylene evolution and its role in the changes observed in mechanically perturbed bean plants. Phys Plant 62: 289–296

    Google Scholar 

  7. Erner Y and Jaffe MJ (1982) Thigmomorphogenesis: The involvement of auxin and abscisic acid in growth retardation due to mechanical perturbation. Plant Cell Physiol 23: 935–941

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fletcher R (1984) Sugar beet growing in Japan. Brit Sugar Beet Rev 52 (4): 8–10

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grace J (1977) Plant Responses to Wind. London, New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grace J and Russell G (1982) The effect of wind and a reduced supply of water on the growth and water relations of Festuca arundinaceae Schreb. Ann Bot 49: 217–225

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hiron RW and Symonds W (1985) Vegetable propagation in cellular trays. ADAS Leaflet 909, MAFF, Alnwick

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hofinger M, Chappelle B, Boyer N and Gaspar T (1979) GC-MS identification and titration of IAA in mechanically perturbed Byronia dioica. Plant Physiol 63: S-52

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hunt ERJr and Jaffe MJ (1980) Thigmomorphogenesis: The interaction of wind and temperature in the field on thigmomorphogenesis in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Ann Bot 45: 665–672

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jaffe MJ (1976) Thigmomorphogenesis: A detailed characterisation of the response of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to mechanical stimulation. Z Pflanzenphysiol 77: 437–453

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liptay A (1985) Reduction of spindliness of tomato transplants grown at high densities. Can J Plant Sci 65: 797–801

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mitchell CA, Severson CJ, Wott JA and Hammer PA (1975) Seismomorphogenic regulation of plant growth. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 100: 161–165

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pitcairn CER, Jeffree CE and Grace J (1986) Influence of polishing and abrasion on the diffusive conductance of leaf surface of Festuca arundinacea Schreb. Plant Cell Environ 9: 191–196

    Google Scholar 

  18. Suge H (1978) Growth and gibberellin production in Phaseolus vulgaris as affected by mechanical stress. Plant Cell Physiol 19: 1557–1560

    Google Scholar 

  19. Takahashi H and Suge H (1980) Sex expression in cucumber plants as affected by mechanical stress. Plant Cell Physiol 21: 303–310

    Google Scholar 

  20. Takaki A, Masuda T, Tsukishima N, Kagawa K and Kurosawa K (1977) The effects of mechanical stimulation on the seedling growth of sugar beet. I. Proc Sugar Beet Res Assoc 19: 203–212

    Google Scholar 

  21. Telewski FW and Jaffe MJ (1986) Thigmomorphogenesis: Field and laboratory studies of Abies fraseri in response to wind or mechanical perturbation. Physiol Plant 66: 211–218

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biddington, N.L., Dearman, A.S. The effects of mechanically-induced stress and plant growth regulators on the growth of lettuce, cauliflower and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants. Plant Growth Regul 5, 183–194 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024694

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024694

Key words

Navigation