Summary
Three series of full-sib progenies and parental inbred lines or populations were used to study the inheritance of the number of cells and length of cell along the hypocotyl length, and the response to gibberellic acid in young plants of sugar beet. Variance components were determined by using a factorial cross design. There were no significant estimates of non-additive genetic variation for either cellular characters. Both additive and non-additive genetic variance were responsible for the variability of stem length after GA3 treatment. It is concluded that additive type genes predominantly control the number of cells in all series. The length of cell had significant additive variances in most cases, but it was indeed markedly influenced by environmental factors. Number of cells (cell division rate) and GA3 sensitivity in young plants even before vernalization were related to bolting tendency. Bolting-susceptible genotypes generally expressed higher stem length in the response to added GA3 as compared to the bolting-resistant genotypes. However, some genotypes bolted easily in the field but reacted weakly to the GA3 treatment and vise versa. Genotypes that were susceptible to bolting and/or sensitive to GA3 had a specific range (intermediate) of cell number. There were, however, some genotypes containing an intermediate number of cells which demonstrated low bolting. These responded faintly to gibberellin treatment. The results suggest that several physiological requirements have to be fulfilled before bolting can occur, and that other plant characters interfere with the bolting phenomenon.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernier G., J.M.Kinet & R.M.Sachs, 1981. The physiology of flowering, Volume II. CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, Florida. 231 pp.
Comstock R.E. & H.F.Robinson, 1948. The components of genetic variance in populations of biparental progenies and their use in estimating the average degree of dominance. Biometrics 4: 254–266.
Doney D.L. & J.C.Theurer, 1983. Genetics of cell size and sucrose concentration in sugar beet. Crop Sci. 23: 904–907.
Doney D.L. & J.C.Theurer, 1985. Inheritance of cell division rates of sugar beet. Crop Sci. 25: 76–78.
Gaskill J.O., 1957. A preliminary report on the use of gibberellic acid to hasten reproductive development in sugar beet seedlings. Journal of the A.S.S.B.T. IX(6): 521–528.
Hallauer A.R. & J.B.Miranda, 1986. Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp. 52–72.
Lance A. & P.Rondet, 1957. Evolution du méristem apical de Beta vulgaris L. (variété Ceres sucriere) de la germination à i'inflorescence. C.R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 245: 712–715.
Lexander K., 1985. Beta vulgaris, beet crops (Sugar, Forage, Vegetable). In: Abraham H.Halevy (Ed.), Handbook of flowering, volume II, pp. 24–32. CRC press Boca Raton, Florida.
Lexander K., 1987. Characters related to the vernalization requirement of sugar beet. In: J.G.Atherton (Ed.), Manipulation of flowering, pp. 147–158. Butterworths, London.
Margara J. 1964. Discussion sur les relations entre élongation calinaire et initiation florale chez la betterave bisannuelle, Beta vulgaris L. Ann. Physiol. vég. 6(3): 243–250.
Sadeghian S.Y. & E.Johansson, 1993. Genetic study of bolting and stem length in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) using a factorial cross design. Euphytica 65: 177–185.
Tasopoulou D.P. & A.G.Sficas, 1978. Bolting, fresh root yield, and soluble solids of sugar beet as affected by sowing date and gibberellin treatment. Journal of the A.S.S.B.T. 20(2): 115–126.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sadeghian, S.Y., Johansson, E. & Lexander, K. A genetic analysis of the number of cells, length of cell, and gibberellic acid sensitivity in sugar beet and their relation to bolting mechanism. Euphytica 68, 59–67 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024155
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024155