Skip to main content
Log in

A Study of the graft union in in vitro micrografted apple

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Light microscopy was used to study graft union formation in in vitro micrografts of tissue cultured apple (Malus domestica. Borkh). Micrografts were constructed using horizontal incisions to form the grafting surface, and placing the cut ends of rootstock and scion into sterile silicon tubing to permit graft formation to occur.

The outer morphological and histological development was similar for different stock-scion micrograft combinations but graft union formation was slower in heterografts than in autografts. Initial leaf expansion at the scion shoot apex occurred in all micrografted plantlets within 1–4 days and was not indicative of graft success. Progressive scion growth and development could be used as an indication of graft success by ten to fourteen days after grafting and probably was related to establisment of cell to cell contact at the graft interface. Microscopy showed initiation of callus proliferation in the vascular cumbium and the pith ten days after grafting. Differentiation was observed subsequently and this was reflected in scion development. Longitudinally orientated cambial cells began to differentiate between twenty and forty days after grafting, and formed a bridge between the vascular cylinders of scion and rootstock. The scions at this stage had as many as eight newly expanded leaves and micrografts were strong enough to permit silicon sleeve removal without damage. Continuity of new vascular elements in rootstock and scion was established around forty days. New vascular elements curved slightly in towards the pith to form a ‘c’ shaped bridge across the graft union. Vascular development continued until it reached completion after six months.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alskieff J and Villemur P (1978) Greffage in vitro d'apex sur des plantules décapitieés de pommier (Malus pumila Mill). Comptes Rendus Hebd Seance Academie Science, Paris 287: 1115–1118

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burger DW (1985) Micrografting: A tool for the plant propagator. Proceedings of the International Plant Propagation Society 34: 244–248

    Google Scholar 

  3. Errea P, Felipe A and Herrero M (1994) Graft establishment between compatible and incompatible Prunus species. Journal of Experimental Botany 45: 393–401

    Google Scholar 

  4. Garner RJ (1979) Chapter 11 The Grafters Handbook, pp 130–222. London: Faber and Faber

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gebhardt K and Goldbach R (1988) Establisment, graft union characteristics and growth of Prunus micrografts. Physiologia Planatarum 72: 153–159

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gersani M (1985) Appearance of new transport capacity in wounded plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 36: 1809–1816

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hartmann HT, Kester DE and Davies FT (1990). Chapter 11, Theoretical Aspects of Grafting and Budding. In: Plant Propagation Practices and Principles 5th Edition. Englewood Cliffs: New Jersey Prentice Hall Inc

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huang SC and Millikan DF (1980) In vitro micrografting of apple shoot tips. Hortscience 15: 741–743

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jonard R (1986) Micrografting and its application to tree improvement. In: Bajaj YPS (eds) Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry. Trees I, pp 31–48. Heidleberg: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  10. Juliano JB (1941) Callus development at the graft union. Phillipine Journal of Science 75: 245–251

    Google Scholar 

  11. MacDonald B (1989) Chapters 16–20 Practical Woody Plant Propagation for Nursery Growers, Volume 1, pp 443–591. Portland: Oregon Timber Press

    Google Scholar 

  12. McCully ME (1983) Structural aspects of graft development. In: Moore R (ed) Vegetative Compatibility Responses in Plants, pp 71–105. Texas: Baylor University Press

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moore R (1984) A model for graft compatibility-incompatibility in higher plants. American Journal of Botany 71: 752–758

    Google Scholar 

  14. Monteuuis O and Gautheret R (1986) In vitro micrografting of Sequoiadendron giganteum meristems. Comptes Rendu Academie Science, Paris 302 Sers 111 (6): 223–225

    Google Scholar 

  15. Murashige T and Skoog G (1962) A revised medium for the rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Planatarum 15: 473–479

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murashige T, Bitters WP, Rangan TJ, Nauer EM, Roistacher CN and Holliday PB (1972) A technique of shoot apex grafting and its utilisation towards recovering virus free citrus clones. Hortscience 7: 118–119

    Google Scholar 

  17. Navarro L, Roistacher CN, and Murashige T (1975) Improvement of shoot tip grafting for virus free clones. Journal for the American Society of Horticultural Science 100: 471–479

    Google Scholar 

  18. Navarro L (1988) Application of shoot tip grafting to Woody Species. Acta Horticulturae 227: 43–45

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parkinson M and Yeoman MM (1982) Graft formation in cultured explanted internodes. New Phytologist 91: 711–719

    Google Scholar 

  20. Parkinson M, O'Neill CM and Dix PJ (1990) Chapter 11 Grafting In Vitro. In: Pollard JW and Walker JM (eds) Methods in Molecular Biology vol 6, Plant Cell and Tissue Culture, pp 105–111. New Jersey: Humana Press

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pospisilova J, Solarova AJ and Catsky J (1992) Photosynthetic responses to stress during in vitro cultivation. Photosynthetica 26: 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rodgers WS and Beakbane AB (1957) Stock and scion relations. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 8: 217–236

    Google Scholar 

  23. Simons RK (1986) Graft union characteristics as related to dwarfing in apple (Malus domestica Borkh). Acta Horticulturae 160: 57–66

    Google Scholar 

  24. Soumelidou K (1994) The anatomy of the developing bud graft union and its relationship to dwarfing in apple. Annals of Botany 74: 605–611

    Google Scholar 

  25. Teidemann R (1989) Graft union development and symplastic phloem contact in the heterograft Cucumis sativus on Cucurbita ficiafolia. Journal of Plant Physiology 134: 427–440

    Google Scholar 

  26. Webster AD, Sparks TR and Belchet A (1986) The influence of micropropagation and chemical mutagens on the growth and precocity of Cox's Orange Pippin and Bramley's Seedling Apple. Acta Horticulturae 180: 25–34

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richardson, F.V.M., tSaoir, S.M.A. & Harvey, B.M.R. A Study of the graft union in in vitro micrografted apple. Plant Growth Regul 20, 17–23 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024052

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024052

Key words

Navigation