Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of sugar cane variety trials. I. Components of variance and genotype-environment interactions

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Surgarcane variety trial data from Barbados and Jamaica were analysed by the analysis of variance. From these analyses, components of variance were estimated in an attempt to quantify genotype x environment interactions. Sixteen sets of trials from Barbados and eight from Jamaica were analysed. The results show that GE effects in both countries were small. It is suggested, on the basis of these analyses that variety trials could use resources more efficiently by growing them at fewer sites, since the absence of site x variety interaction makes each site equally effective for identifying the best genotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard R. W. & A. D.Bradshaw, 1964. Implications of genotype-environmental interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop Sci. 4: 503–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowker B. D., 1971. Variation studies in carrots as an aid to breeding. I. Concepts. J. Hort. Sci. 46: 455–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley J. W. & R. H.Moll, 1969. Interpretation and use of estimates of heritability and genetic variances in plant breeding. Crop Sci. 9: 257–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, E. F., 1965. An experiment to assess the effects of competition between sugar cane clones of the Microplot stage of selection. Proc. of 12th Congress of the ISSCT: 920–930.

  • Hill J., 1975. Genotype-environmental interactions-a challenge to plant breeding. J. Agric. Sci. 85: 477–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth D. M., 1971. Quantitative inheritance studies in sugar cane. I. Estimation of variance components. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 22: 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsey M. F., J. H.Lonquist & C. O.Garner, 1962. Estimates of genetic variance in open-pollinated varieties of corn-belt corn. Crop Sci. 2: 105–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller P. A., J. C.Williams, R. E.Comstock & H. G.Robinson, 1958. Estimates of genotypic and environmental variances and co-variances in upland cotton and their implications in selection. Agron. J. 50: 126–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller P. A., J. C.Williams & H. G.Robinson, 1959. Variety x environmental interactions in cotton variety tests and their implications on testing methods. Agron. J. 51: 132–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlevliet J. E., 1976. Breeding pyrethrum in Kenya. Pyrethrum Post. 13: 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner J. C., 1961. Sugar Cane Selection Experiments. 2. Competition between varieties. Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations Queensland Tech. Comm. 1961, No. 1: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G. W. & W. G. Cochran, 1967. Statistical methods. pp. 368–375. Iowa State University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kennedy, A.J. Analysis of sugar cane variety trials. I. Components of variance and genotype-environment interactions. Euphytica 27, 767–775 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023713

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023713

Index words

Navigation