Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of epistasis in chickpea

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Triple test cross-analysis was used to detect epistasis in chickpea. None of the characters investigated exhibited epistasis. In the absence of epistasis, additive and dominance effects were estimated. The results indicated the importance of additive genetic variance for seed yield, biological yield, number of primary branches, number of secondary branches, 100-seed weight, days to flower, and number of seeds per pod; dominance genetic variance for days to mature; and both additive and dominance genetic variances for plant height. Selection methods, such as pedigree and bulk, are suggested for the improvement of most characters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauman, L.F., 1959. Evidence of non-allelic gene interaction in determining yield, ear height, and kernel row number in corn. Agron. J. 51: 531–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinks, J.L., J.M., Perkins & E.L., Breese, 1969. A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits. II. Application to inbred lines. Heredity 24: 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsey, M.J. & J.L., Jinks, 1968. A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits. I. Theory. Heredity 23: 403–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketata, H., E.L., Smith, L.H., Edwards & R.W., McNew, 1976. Detection of epistatic, additive and dominance variation in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell.). Crop Sci. 16: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, B., 1972. Diallel analysis of grain yield and some other quantitative traits in Bengal-gram (Cicer arietinum L.). M.Sc. Thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

  • Rang, A., 1980. Genetic analysis of grain yield, its components and quality in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Ph.D. Thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

  • Singh, H., 1981. Competition and genetic analysis of yield factors in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Ph.D. Thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

  • Sprague, G.F., W.A., Russel, L.H., Penny, T.W., Horner & W.D., Hanson, 1962. Effect of epistasis on grain yield in maize. Crop Sci. 2: 205–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuber, G.W. & R.H., Moll, 1969. Epistasis in maize (Zea mays L.). 1. F1 hybrids and their S1 progeny. Crop Sci. 9: 124–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yermanos, D.M. & R.W., Allard, 1961. The detection of epistatic gene action in flax. Crop Sci. 1: 307–310.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Joint contribution from ICARDA, P.O. Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria and ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics), Patancheru P.O. 502 324, A.P., India.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malhotra, R.S., Singh, K.B. Detection of epistasis in chickpea. Euphytica 40, 169–172 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023312

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023312

Key words

Navigation