Summary
In the genus Petunia, forty inbred, lines and related species, were compared for their regeneration capacity at the seedling stage. Individual seedlings were observed as positive or negative for the presence of neoformed buds at five locations; it was observed that the presence of buds in the axillary zone of cotyledons, around their insertions and up their surface were the best estimators of differences in regeneration capacity. A very large scale of variation was found between these lines and species. After this first experiment, genotypes were selected for a further study: responses to four cytokinin concentrations were evaluated. Genotypic effects, cytokinin effects and genotype-cytokinin interactions were highly significant. Five F1 hybrids between High or Low responsive lines and the same tester were compared with their parental forms under this basis. The major genetic component was additive; a maternal effect was frequently found between reciprocal hybrids. The cytokinin effects and genotype-cytokinin interactions were highly significant. A single couple of parents and their hybrids were choosen for a backcross generation. The segregation ratio observed between cloned individuals from the backcross suggests that two loci should be responsible for the differences observed between these parental forms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baroncelli, S., M. Buiatti, A. Bennici, G. Foroughi-Wehr, B. Mix, H. Gaul, A.M. Tagliasacchi, M. Loiero & B. Giorgi, 1978. Genetic control of in vitro and in vivo growth in hexaploid wheat. I. Behaviour of ditelocentric lines. Z. Pflanzenzüchtung 80: 109–116.
Behki, R.M. & S.M. Lesley, 1976. In vitro plant regeneration from leaf explants of Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato). Can J. Bot 54: 2409–2414.
Binding, H., 1971. Organogenese an Kallus von Petunia hybrida. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 65: 359–364.
Buiatti, M., S. Baroncelli & A. Bennici, 1974. Genetics of growth and differentiation in vitro of Brassica oleracea var. botrytis. IV. Genotype-Hormone interactions. Z. Pflanzenzücht 73: 298–302.
Cornu, A., D. Maizonnier, H. Wiering & P. de Vlaming, 1980. Petunia genetics. III. The linkage group of chromosome V. Ann. Amélior. Plantes 30: 443–454.
Dietert, M.F., S.A. Barron & O.C. Yoder, 1982. Effects of genotype on in vitro culture in the genus Brassica. Plant Sci. Lett. 26: 233–240.
Donn, G., D. Hess & I. Potrykus, 1973. Wachstum und Differenzierung in aus isolierten Protoplasten von Petunia hybrida entstandenem Kallus. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 69: 423–437.
Dulieu, H.L., R. Bruneau & A. Pelletier, 1983. Heritable differences in regenerability in Petunia, at the protoplast and at the seedling stage, in ‘Protoplasts 1983, Poster Proceedings, 236–237’ 6th Int. Protoplast Symposium, Basel, August 12–16, 1983.
Falconer, D.S., 1961. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, ed. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh and London, 365 pp.
Frankenberger, E.A., P.M. Hasegawa & E.C. Tighelaar, 1981. Diallel analysis of shoot-forming capacity among selected tomato genotypes. Z. für Pflanzenphysiol. 102: 233–242.
Hanson, M.R. & P.E. Read, 1981. A comparison of in vitro culture and whole plant performance of four Petunia hybrida cultivars and their inbred parents. HortiSci 16: 426.
Izhar, S. & J.B. Power, 1977. Genetical studies with Petunia leaf protoplasts. I. Genetic variation to specific growth hormones and possible genetic control on stages of protoplast development in culture. Plant Sci. Lett. 8: 375–383.
Keyes, G.J., G.B. Collins & N.L. Taylor, 1980. Genetic variation in tissue culture of Red Clover. Theor. Appl. Genet. 58: 265–271.
Koornneef, M., C.J. Hanhart & L. Martinelli, 1987. A genetic analysis of cell culture traits in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74: 633–641.
Kurtz, S.M. & R.D. Lineberger, 1983. Genotypic differences in morphogenic capacity of cultured leaf explants of tomato. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 108: 710–714.
Mitchell, A.Z., M.R. Hanson, R.C. Skvirsky & F.M. Ausubel, 1980. Anther culture of Petunia: genotypes with high frequency of callus, root, or plantlet formation. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 100: 131–146.
Morel, G., C. Martin & G. Muller, 1968. La guérison de pommes de terre atteintes de maladies à virus. Ann. Physiol. Vég. 10: 113–139.
Murashige, T. & F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. plant 15: 473–497.
Ohki, S., C. Bigot & J. Mousseau, 1978. Analysis of the shoot-forming capacity in vitro in two lines of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) and their hybrids. Plant Cell Physiol. 19: 27–42.
Paterson, K.E. & N.P. Everett, 1985. Regeneration of Helianthus annuus inbred plants from callus. Plant Science 42: 125–132.
Power, J.B., E.M. Frearson, G. George, P.K. Evans, S.F. Bevry, C. Hayward & E.C. Cocking, 1976. The isolation, culture, and regeneration of leaf protoplasts in the genus Petunia. Plant Sci. Lett. 7: 51–55.
Reich, B. & E.T. Bingham, 1980. The genetic control of bud formation from callus cultures of diploid alfalfa. Plant Sci. Lett. 20: 71–77.
Sears, R.G. & E.L. Deckard, 1982. Tissue culture variability in wheat: callus induction and plant regeneration. Crop Science 22: 546–550.
Skvirsky, R.C., M.R. Hanson & F.M. Ansubel, 1984. Intraspecific genetic variation in cytokinin-controlled shoot morphogenesis from tissue explants of Petunia hybrida. Plant Sci. Lett. 35: 237–246.
Skvirsky, R.C., M.R. Hanson & F.M. Ausubel, 1980. Analysis of cytokinin-controlled shoot morphogenesis from tissue explants of Petunia hybrida. In: E.D. Earle & Y. Demarly. (Eds). Variability of plants regenerated from tissue culture, Praeger NY, pp 101–119.
Steel, R.G.D. & J.H. Torrie, 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics, Mc Graw Hill Company, NY, 481 pp.
Tal, M., K. Dehan & H. Heikin, 1977. Morphogenetic potential of cultured sections of cultivated and wild species of tomato. Ann. Bot. 41: 937–941.
Tan, M.M.C., C.M. Colijn-Hooijmans, W.H. Lindhout & A.J. Kool, 1987. A comparison of shoot regeneration from protoplasts and leaf discs of different genotypes of the cultivated tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75: 105–108.
De Vlaming, P., A. Cornu, E. Farcy, A.G.M. Gerats, D. Maizonnier, H. Wiering & H.J.W. Wijsman, 1984. Petunia hybrida: A short description of the action of 91 genes, their origin and their map location. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2: 21–42.
Wiering, H., P. de Vlaming, A. Cornu & D. Maizonnier, 1979. Petunia Genetics. I. List of genes. Ann. Amélior. Plantes 29: 611–622.
Wiering, H., P. de Vlaming, A. Cornu & D. Maizonnier, 1979. Petunia Genetics. II. A comparison of two gene banks. Ann. Amélior. Plantes 29: 699–708.
Zelcer, A., O. Soferman & S. Izhar, 1984. An in vitro screening for tomato genotypes exhibiting efficient shoot regeneration. J. Plant Physiol. 115: 211–215.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dulieu, H. Inheritance of the regeneration capacity in the genus Petunia . Euphytica 53, 173–181 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023269
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023269