Summary
The costs associated with yield testing cause maize (Zea mays L.) breeders to search for ways to maximize testing efficiency. The objective of this study was to select individual locations, or a group of locations as preliminary testing sites for yield evaluation of maize hybrids within FAO 600 maturity zone in Yugoslavia. Yield data for 12 locations obtained for the period 1975 to 1984 were used. The predictive potential of the site was judged by the correlations between location means and overall mean (r>0.95), linear regression of locations means on overall mean (b>1.0) and percentage of the 10% overall highest yielding hybrids selected by 10% selection intensity at each location, or at the group of locations (Is>80%). Also factors as average location yield (x) and variation in individual location yield during the period of 10 years (CV) were related to the predictive potential of the site. Differences among locations in all criteria were found. Average yielding locations had higher values of estimators of predictive ability of overall performance than low yielding locations. None of individual locations satisfied all requested criteria. Five locations with highest values for each individual criterion were selected and all possible two, three, four and five-location combinations among them studied. Combinations of two locations could be used for very preliminary screening of hybrids by applying mild selection intensity. A more accurate prediction of overall one-year performance requires an evaluation of hybrids in a minimum of three, but frequently four, selected locations. However, for precise estimation of over-year hybrid performance, testing the hybrids at selected locations in more than one year is necessary.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abou-El-Fittouh, A.H., J.O. Rawlings & P.A. Miller, 1969. Classification of environments to control genotype x environment interaction with application to cotton. Crop Sci. 9: 135–140.
Allen, F.L., R.E. Comstock & D.C. Rasmusson, 1978. Optimal environment for yield testing. Crop Sci. 18: 747–751.
Beaver, J.S., 1983. Genotype x environment interaction in field research. University of Illinois, Agronomy 493.
Brown, K.D., M.E. Sorrells & W.R. Coffman, 1983. A method for classification and evaluation of testing environments. Crop Sci. 23: 889–893.
Fakorede, M.A.B., 1986. Selection of sites for preliminary maize yield trials in the rainforest zone of South-Western Nigeria. Euphytica 35: 441–447.
Fasoulas, A., 1973. A new approach of breeding superior yielding varieties. Dept. Gen. Pl. Breed. Aristotelian University of Thesalonika Publ. No. 3: 1–42.
Finlay, K.W. & G.N. Wilkinson, 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programe. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14: 742–754.
Hamblin, J.H., H.M. Fisher & H.I. Ridings, 1980. The choice of locality for plant breeding when selecting for high yield and general adaptation. Euphytica 29: 161–168.
Horner, T.W. & K.J. Frey, 1957. Methods for determination of natural areas for oat varieties based upon known environmental variables. Agronomy J. 52: 396–399.
Liang, G.H., E.G. Heyne & T.L. Walter, 1966. Estimates of variety x environment interactions in yield tests of three small grains and their significance on the breeding program. Crop Sci. 6: 135–139.
Rolph, F.J. & R.R. Sokal, 1981. Statistical tables. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.
Rosielle, A.A. & J.H. Hamblin, 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Sci. 21: 943–946.
Shutz, W.M. & R.L. Bernard, 1967. Genotype x environment interactions in the regional testing of soybean strains. Crop Sci. 7: 125–130.
Vela-Cardinas, M. & K.J. Frey, 1972. Optimum environment for maximizing heritability and genetic gain from selection. Iowa State J. Sci. 46: 381–394.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miŝević, D., Dumanović, J. Examination of methods for choosing locations for preliminary maize yield testing. Euphytica 44, 173–180 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022614
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022614