Skip to main content
Log in

Trials to overcome the incompatibility of crosses between Lycopersicum esculentum and Lycopersicum glandulosum by repeated grafting

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In breeding tomatoes for resistance to “Corky root” Lycopersicum glandulosum is used as a resistant parent. Crosses of tomato with L. glandulosum are difficult to effect because of the incompatibility of the partners. To overcome this incompatibility the “approach method” was applied beside the conventional crosses.

Repeated reciprocal grafting of tomato onto L. glandulosum and also L. glandulosum on tomato did not increase the number of effected matings. The statement that by repeated grafting the characters of the scion change under the influence of the stock could not be confirmed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Avakjan, A. A., and N. G. Jastreb, Hybridisation by means of grafts. Jarovisacia 1941: 1: 50–57 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander, L. J., and M. M. Hoover, Progress report of National Screening Committee for disease resistance in the tomato for 1952. Plant Dis. Reptr., Washington, 37 (1953): 317–324.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baldin, P. G., Vegetative hybridisation of the tomato. Agrobiology, Moscow 1952: 4: 142–145.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bateman, A. J., Grafting experiments between the tomato varieties Golden Apple and Oxheart. Nature 175 (1955): 1118–1120.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Böhme, H., Untersuchungen zum Problem der genetischen Bedeutung von Pfropfungen zwischen genotypisch verschiedenen Pflanzen. Z. Pflanzenz. 33 (1954): 367–418.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brix, K., Untersuchungen über den Einfluss der Pfropfung auf Reis und Unterlage und die Möglichkeit einer Übertragung eventueler Veränderungen auf die Nachkommen. Z. Pflanzenz. 31 (1952): 261–288.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burdick, A. B., Experimental evidence relating to one postulate of the new Russian genetics. Genetics 37 (1952): 570.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cucin, N. V., and M. Z. Nasarova, Experiments on wide vegetative and sexual hybridisation of plants. Bull. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S. 1953, 1: 20–25 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ermolaeva, N. J., An experiment in vegetative hybridisation in order to obtain economically valuable types of tomato. Jarovisacia 1941: 2 (35): 31–34 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fainborn, V. D., The inheritance of characters obtained by grafting in tomatoes. Trud. Inst. Genet. Leningr., 1953: 20: 210–224 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Felföldy, L. J. M., Experiments with the first seed generation of tomato grafts. Acta. Biol. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 1951: 2: 3–53 (Hungarian).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Forlani, R., Innesti fra Solanacee. Genetica Agraria, 3 (1951): 89–92.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Glavinic, R., L'hybridisation vegetative comme méthode dans la sélection des tomates. Report of the 14th International Horticultural Congress-1955: 440–445.

  14. Golinska, J., A description of the segregation of vegetative cross of red tomato with a yellow. Roczn. Nauk Rol. Ser. A. 68 (1954): 507–516 (Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Glustschenko, I. E., The hybridisation of plants by grafting. Adv. mod. Biol., Moscow 30 (1950): 15–48 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hackbarth, J., Tomate-Lycopersicum esculentum Mill. Handbuch der Pflanzenzüchtung Bd 5, 1950. Berlin. 464–476.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harkacjan, S. S., Combined action of grafting and hybridisation upon tomatoes. Sad i Ogerod 1949: 7: 47–48 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hasina, E. P., Repeated backgrafting as a method of intensifying changes in the heritable characters of plants. Dokl. Vsesoj. Acad. Sjelsk. Nauk im V. I. Lenina 1952: 6: 9–11 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Haschkova, O., Grafting as a means of plant transformation. Dokl. Vsesoj. Acad. Sjelsk. Nauk. Im. V. I. Lenina 1944: 8–9: 12–18 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kress, H., Mitschurin-Lyssenko-Arbeiten in der Saatzucht Gülzow-Güstrow (Meckl.). Mitt. deutsch. Landwirtsch. Ges. (DLG) 3 (1990): 270–273.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mc. Guire, D. C., and C. M. Rick, Selfincompatibility in species of Lycopersicon sect. Eriopersicon and hybrids with Lyc. esculentum. Hilgardia: 23 (1954): 101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Prakken, R., Entproeven met tomaat en tabak. Studiekring voor Plantenveredeling. 20. II. 1952: 442–445.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Prjadcenku, A., Achievements of plant breeding in the Rumanian People's, Republic. Agrobiology, Moscow 1955: 4: 229–304 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sedljamair, K., Plant breeding in Hungary along Mitschurin's road. Agrobiology, Moscow 1955: 5: 26–31. (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Soost, R. K., Another high beta-carotene line. Rep. Tom. Genet. Coop.: 6 (1956): 29.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sachs, L., Vegetative hybridisation in the tomato. Nature 167: 1951: 282–283.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stubbe, H., Über die vegetatieve Hybridisierung von Pflanzen. Versuche an Tomatenmutanten. Kulturpflanze 2 (1954): 185–236.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thung, T. H., Jaarverslag Instituut voor Plantenziektenkundig Onderzoek, Wageningen. 1954: 11–12.

  29. Whaley, W. G., The growth of reciprocal tomato-tobacco grafts. Bull. Torrey bot. Cl. 80 (1953): 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szteyn, K. Trials to overcome the incompatibility of crosses between Lycopersicum esculentum and Lycopersicum glandulosum by repeated grafting. Euphytica 8, 145–150 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022433

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022433

Keywords

Navigation