Skip to main content
Log in

Independence of self-compatibility and potentiality for self-pollination in peach x almond hybrids

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The almond of commerce (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb) is self-incompatible (SI) and requires honey-bees to effect the transfer of pollen among cultivars that flower simultaneously. Four year old trees from the F2 generation of several peach x almond hybrids were studied to determine whether self-compatibility (SC) and the potentiality for natural, i.e., abiotic, self pollination (NSP) are genetically related or are inherited independently. Both SC and the high potentiality for NSP are characteristic of peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) but not almond. Forty percent of SC genotypes exhibited adequate NSP (SC, +NSP) for good fertility i.e., without insect-mediated pollination. The remaining 60% of SC genotypes (SC,-NSP) exhibited an average 61% reduction in fruit set on limbs bagged to exclude honeybees during anthesis relative to fruit set on open pollinated limbs. Our data are consistent with the concept that fertility is dependent upon the load of compatible pollen deposited on the stigma. Fruit set reduction on bagged limbs, compared with bagged and self-pollinated limbs, was presumably due to a) lack of/insufficient pollination for fertilization and/or b) post-zygotic abortion of genetically inferior recombinants. Selection following manual self-pollination may result in SC genotypes with or without the capacity for NSP. In contrast, significant fruit set on limbs enclosed during pistil receptivity necessitates that the genotype selected express both SC and the potentiality for NSP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, D.L., 1957. A cytogenetic study of some derivatives of the F1 hybrid Prunus amygdalus x P. persica. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detjen, L.R., 1944. Fruitfulness in peaches and its relationship to morphology and physiology of pollen grains. Univ. Del. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. No. 257, 24 pp.

  • Godini, A., E. Ferrara, S. Reina, V. Giorgio, & F. Guida, 1977. Contribut alla Conoscenza delle cultivar di mandorlo (P. amygdalus Batsch) della Puglia. III. Un triennio di prove d'simpollinazione incrociata, 3rd Coll., Groupe Recherche et d'Etudes Méditerranéen pour l'Amandier, Bari, Centre Internationale des Hautes Etudes d'Agronomie Méditerranéenes, MontPellier, pp. 194–206.

  • Griggs, W.H., 1953. Pollination requirements of fruits and nuts. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Civc. 424, 35 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrold, T.J., 1935. Comparative study of the developing and aborting fruit of Prunus persica. Bot. Gaz. 96: 505–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, C.O. 1975. Peaches. pp. 285–335. In: J. Janick & J.N. Moore (Eds.), Advances in Fruit Breeding. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester, D.E. & W.H. Griggs, 1959. Fruit setting in the almond: the effects of cross pollinating various percentage of flowers. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 74: 206–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langridge, D.F., P.T. Jenkins & R.D. Goodman, 1977. A study of pollination of dessert peaches cv. Crawford. Aust. J. Exp. Agr. Anim. Husb. 17: 697–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langridge, D.F. & R.D. Goodman, 1979. Pollination of canning peaches cv. Golden Queen. Aust. J. Exp. Agr. Anim. Husb. 19: 510–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Nettancourt, D., 1977. Incompatibility in angiosperms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimienta, E. & V.S. Polito, 1983. Embryo sac development in almond [Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb] as affected by cross-, self and non-pollination. Ann. Bot. 51: 469–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimienta, E., V.S. Polito & D.E. Kester, 1983. Pollen tube growth in cross- and self-pollinated ‘Nonpareil’ almond. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108: 643–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragland, C.H., 1934. The development of peach fruit with special reference to split-pit and gumming. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 31: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Socias i Company, R., 1983. Flower sterility in almond. Acta Hort. 139: 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Socias i Company, R., D.E. Kester & M.V. Bradley, 1976. Effects of temperature and genotype on pollen tube growth in some self-incompatible and self-compatible almond cultivars. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 101: 490–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, A.G., 1981. Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12: 253–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorp, R.W., 1978. Bee management for almond pollination. In: Almond Orchard Management. University of California Priced Publication 4092, pp. 57–61.

  • Vasilakakis, M. & I.C. Porlingis, 1984. Self-compatibility in ‘Truoito’ almond and the effect of temperature on selfed an crossed pollen tube growth. HortScience, 19: 659–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinbaum, S.A. & A. Erez, 1983. Autogamy among selected peach and nectarine cultivars. Fruit Var. J 37: 113–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinbaum, S.A., V.S. Polito & D.E. Kester, 1985. Natural self-pollination in peach, almond, and peach x almond interspecific F1 hybrids. Euphytica 35: 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weinbaum, S.A., Shaw, D.V. & Muraoka, T.T. Independence of self-compatibility and potentiality for self-pollination in peach x almond hybrids. Euphytica 41, 53–58 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022410

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022410

Key words

Navigation