Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 89, Issue 3, pp 319–324 | Cite as

Initial screening of chili and sweet pepper germplasm for resistance to chili thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood

  • N. K. Krishna Kumar
  • M. Aradya
  • A. A. Deshpande
  • N. Anand
  • P. R. Ramachandar
Article
  • 164 Downloads

Summary

A preliminary evaluation for resistance to chili thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood of 41 and 194 pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) germplasms during 1987 and 1988, respectively, indicated chili accessions may be a promising source of resistance. In contrast, all sweet pepper accessions tested were highly susceptible. A number of chili accessions produced a moderate yield, in spite of a high thrips infestation indicating tolerance to S. dorsalis. Rating for thrips damage was more reliable and efficient than estimating thrips numbers in screening pepper accessions for resistance to thrips. Highly significant, positive correlation between ratings at the seedling stage and final rating for thrips damage indicated the feasibility of screening pepper accessions at the seedling stage. Comparing the similarities in rating among accessions resulted in 40 distinct groups. The variance-covariance matrix of the data from these 40 groups was subjected to principal component analysis. This accounted for 56 and 18 per cent of the variation across the two principal axes, respectively. Projection of chili and sweet pepper accessions along these two axes revealed three distinct clusters. About 80 per cent of chili accessions formed the first cluster, 58 per cent of the sweet pepper accessions formed the second cluster and a third cluster exhibited intermediate ratings for thrips damage. The significance of these findings in relation to geographical divergence and resistance to thrips among pepper accessions is discussed.

Key words

Capsicum annuum chili pepper resistance Scirtothrips dorsalis sweet pepper thrips 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amin, P.W., 1979. Leaf curl disease of chili peppers in Maharashtra, India. PANS. 25: 131–134.Google Scholar
  2. Amin, P.W., D.V.R. Reddy, A.W. Ghanekar & M.S. Reddy, 1981. Transmission of tomato spotted wilt virus, causal agent of bud necrosis of peanut, by Scirtothrips dorsalis and Frankliniella schultzei. Plant Dis. 65: 663–665.Google Scholar
  3. Anantha Krishnan, T.N., 1973. Thrips: Biology and control. Macmillan Company of India. Delhi press, Delhi, pp. 120.Google Scholar
  4. Cho, J.J., R.F.L. Mau, R.W. Hartman, L.S. Yudin, D. Gonsalves & R. Provvidenti, 1989. A multidisciplinary approach for tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) management in Hawaii. Plant Dis. 73: 375–383.Google Scholar
  5. David, P.M.M. & P. Natarajan, 1986. Evaluation of chili accessions tolerant to thrips Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood. South Indian Horticulture 34: 432–434.Google Scholar
  6. Fery, R.L. & J.M. Schalk, 1991. Resistance in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) to western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande). HortScience 26(8): 1073–1074.Google Scholar
  7. Horber, E. 1980. Types and classification of resistance. In: F.G. Maxwell & P.R. Jennings (Ed.), Breeding plants resistant to insects. pp. 15–21. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Jagan Mohan, N., K. Krishnaiah & V.G. Prasad, 1980. Evaluation of insecticides for the control of pests of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum var. grossum Linn). Pestology. 4: 1–4.Google Scholar
  9. Lawley, D.N. & A.E. Maxwell, 1963. Factor analysis as a statistical method, Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  10. Lewis, T.R., 1973. Thrips. Their biology, ecology, and economic importance. Academic press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Pickersgill, B., 1971. Relationships between weedy and cultivated forms in some species of chili peppers (genus Capsicum). Evolution: 25: 683–691.Google Scholar
  12. Pickersgill, B., 1989. Genetical resources of Capsicum for tropical regions. p. 1–9. Proc Int. Sym. on Integrated management Services: Tomato and pepper production in the tropics. AVRDC, Taipei.Google Scholar
  13. Poulos, J.M., 1994. Pepper breeding (Capsicum spp.): achievements, challenges and possibilities. Plant Breeding Abstracts. 64: 143–155.Google Scholar
  14. Rao, M. & K. Ahmed, 1986. Screening of chili germplasm for resistance to some important pests. Cocoa, Arecanut & Spices Journal. 9: 40–43.Google Scholar
  15. Sanap, M.M. & R.N. Nawale, 1985. Reaction of chili cultivars to thrips and mites. J. Maharashtra agric. Univ. 10: 352–353.Google Scholar
  16. Singh, J.H. & D.S. Cheema, 1989. Present status of tomato and pepper production in India. p. 452–471. Proc Int. Sym. on Integrated management Services: Tomato and pepper production in the tropics. AVRDC, Taipei.Google Scholar
  17. Tewari, G.C., Deshpande, A.A. & N. Anand, 1985. Chili pepper genotype resistant to thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood). Capsicum Nwls. 4: 73–74.Google Scholar
  18. Yoon, J.Y., Green, S.K., Tschanz, A.T., Tsou, S.C.S. & L.C. Chang, 1989. Pepper improvement in the tropics: Problems and the AVRDC approach. p. 86–98. Proc Int. Sym. on Integrated management Services: Tomato and pepper production in the tropics. AVRDC, Taipei.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. K. Krishna Kumar
    • 1
  • M. Aradya
    • 2
  • A. A. Deshpande
    • 3
  • N. Anand
    • 3
  • P. R. Ramachandar
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of Entomology & NematologyIndian Institute of Horticulture ResearchBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of BotanyUniversity of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluU.S.A.
  3. 3.Division of Vegetable CropsIndian Institute of Horticulture ResearchBangaloreIndia
  4. 4.Section of Economics & StatisticsIndian Institute of Horticulture ResearchBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations