Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 60, Issue 1, pp 75–77 | Cite as

Is the European plum, Prunus domestica L., a P. cerasifera EHRH. x P. spinosa L. allo-polyploid?

  • Daniel Zohary
Article

Summary

The mode of origin of the hexaploid (6x=48) European plum Prunus domestica has been re-examined. It is argued that the evidence in support of an allo-polyploid origin and the participation of 4x P. spinosa in the formation of this fruit tree is far from being satisfactory. Instead, the morphological affinities between P. domestica, P. spinosa and P. cerasifera (= P. divaricata) and the available cytogenetic evidence seem to implicate 2x, 4x, 6x P. cerasifera as the sole wild stock from which the cultivated 6x European plum could have evolved.

Key words

Prunus domestica origin of European plum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beridze, R.K. & M.V., Kvatchadze, 1981. Origin and evolution of cultivated plums of Georgia. Kulturpflanze 29: 147–150.Google Scholar
  2. Browicz, K., 1972. Prunus L. In: P.H. Davis (Ed.). Flora of Turkey Vol. 4. Edinburgh Univ. Press. pp. 8–19.Google Scholar
  3. Crane, M.B. & W.J.C. Lawrence, 1931. Studies in sterility. Proc. 9th Internat. Hortic. Congress. London. pp. 100–116.Google Scholar
  4. Crane, M.B. & W.J.C., Lawrence, 1947. The genetics of garden plants. 3rd ed. MacMillan, London. 299 p.Google Scholar
  5. Crane, M.B. & W.J.C., Lawrence, 1952. The genetics of garden plants. 4th ed. MacMillan, London. 301 p.Google Scholar
  6. Darlington, C.D., 1928. Studies in Prunus I and II. Jour. Genet. 19: 213–256.Google Scholar
  7. Darlington, C.D., 1930. Studies in Prunus III. Jour. Genet. 22: 65–93.Google Scholar
  8. Endlich, von, J. & M., Murawski, 1962. Beiträge zur Züchtungsforschung an Pflaumen. Züchter 32: 121–133.Google Scholar
  9. Johansson, E. & E.J. Oldén, 1962. Zwetschen, Pflaumen, Reineclauden, Mirabellen. In: T. Roemer & W. Rudorf (Eds.). Handbuch der Pflanzenzüchtung, Vol. 6. Paul Parey, Berlin. pp. 602–624.Google Scholar
  10. Rybin, W.A., 1936. Spontane und experimentell erzeugte Bastarde zwischen Schwarzdorn und Kirschpflaume und das Abstammungsproblem der Kulturpflaume. Planta 25: 22–58.Google Scholar
  11. Watkins, R., 1976. Cherry, plum, peach, apricot and almond. In: N.W., Simmonds (Ed.). Evolution of crop plants. Longman, London. pp. 242–247.Google Scholar
  12. Watkins, R., 1981. Plums, apricots, almonds, peaches, cherries (genus Prunus). In: B. Hora (Ed.). The Oxford encyclopaedia of trees of the world. Oxford Univ. Press. pp. 196–201.Google Scholar
  13. Webb, D.A., 1968. Prunus. In: T.G. Tutin et al, (Eds.). Flora Europaea, Vol. 2. Cambridge Univ. Press. pp. 77–80.Google Scholar
  14. Weimarck, H., 1942. Bidrag till Skånes flora 15. En spontan hybrid mellan slån och terson. Bot. Notiser 1942: 218–226.Google Scholar
  15. Weinberger, J.H., 1975. Plums. In: J., Janick & J.N., Moore (Eds.). Advances in fruit breeding. Purdue Univ. Press, West Lafayette, Indiana. pp. 336–347.Google Scholar
  16. Zeven, A.C. & J.M.J., De, Wet, 1982. Dictionary of cultivated plants and their regions of diversity. Pudoc, Wageningen. 263 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Zohary
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Evolution, Systematics and EcologyThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations