Skip to main content
Log in

Field and greenhouse evaluation of the components of partial resistance to early leafspot in peanut

  • Resistance and Tolerance
  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Ten peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes were evaluated fro components of partial resistance to Cercospora arachidicola Hori in the field and in two detached leaf tests in the greenhouse. The relationships among the resistance components in the two environments were examined by computing rank correlations among the components measured in the greenhouse and among those measured in the field. A comparison of field and greenhouse testing for partial resistance was made by determining the correlations between components measured in the two testing methods. The genotypes were significantly different for all the components of resistant measured in the field and for most of the components measured in the greenhouse. In the field study necrotic area/10 cm2 leaf area was moderately correlated (r=0.58) with lesion number/10 cm2 leaf area and highly correlated (r=0.71−0.76) with total lesion number, predicted number of days after planting (X) to reach a standard lesion count, and defoliation. In the greenhouse only the correlation between necrotic area (mm2)/10 cm2 leaf area and sporulation/leaf was highly significant (r=0.71−0.83) in both greenhouse tests. Necrotic area (mm2)/10 cm2 leaf area measured in the field was significantly correlated with that measured in the greenhouse (r=0.66). Sporulation/leaf measured in the greennhouse was significantly correlated (r=0.66) with lesion increase in the field (measured as predicted X). It should thus be possible to evaluate and select for components of partial resistance in the greenhouse to develop resistant lines for the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdou, Y. A. M. & W. E., Cooper, 1974. Effect of culture medium and light on sporulation of two peanut leaf spotting fungi, Cercospora arachidicola Hori and Cercosporidium personatum (Berk. and Curt.) Deighton. Peanut Sci. 1: 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chahal, A. S. & R. S., Sandu, 1972. Reaction of groundnut varieties against Cercospora personatum and C. arachidicola. Plant Dis. Rept. 56: 601–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, D. J., M. K., Beute & J. C., Wynne, 1980a. Spore production and latent period as mechanism of resistance to Cercospora arachidicola in four peanut genotypes. Peanut Sci. 7: 88–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, D. J., M. K., Beute & J. C., Wynne, 1980b. Evaluation of detached leaf culture for screening peanuts for leafspot resistance. Peanut Sci. 7: 98–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, R. W., 1980. The ICRISAT groundnut program, pp. 12–16. Proc. Internat. Workshop on Groundnuts. ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics), Patancheru, A.P., India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobina, S. M., M. A., Melouk & D. J., Banks, 1983. Sporulation of Cercospora arachidicola as a criterion for screening peanut genotypes for leafspot resistance. Phytopathology 73: 556–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammons, R. O., G., Sowell, Jr. & D. H., Smith, 1980. Registration of Cercospora arachidicola-resistant peanut germplasm (Reg. No. GP 10). Crop Sci. 20: 292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, H. N. & M. K., Beute, 1977. Evaluation of resistance to Cercospora leafspot of peanut germplasm potentially useful in a breeding program. Peanut Sci. 4: 78–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland, D. R. & D. I. Arnon, 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agric. Exp. Stn. Sirc. 347.

  • Jackson, C. R. & D. K., Bell, 1969. Diseases of peanut (groundnut) cultivars in Malaysia. Oleagineux 31: 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melouk, H. A. & D. J., Banks, 1978. A method of screening peanut genotypes for resistance to Cercospora leafspots. Peanut Sci. 5: 112–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melouk, H. A., D. J., Banks & M. A., Fanous, 1984. Assessment of resistance to Cercospora arachidicola in peanut genotypes in field plots. Plant Dis. 68: 395–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, P. C., 1976. Effect of defoliation on yield of two groundnut cultivars in Malawi. Oleagineux 31: 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J. & W., Wasserman, 1974. Applied linear statistical models. Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, IL. pp. 160–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevill, D. J., 1981. Components of resistance of Cercospora arachidicola and Cercosporidium personatum in groundnuts. Ann. Appl. Biol. 99: 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlevliet, J. E., 1979. Components of resistance that reduce the rate of epidemic development. Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 17: 203–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, D. M., D. H., Smith & R., Rodriquez-Kabana, 1982. Peanut plant diseases, pp. 326–410. In: H., Pattee & C., Young (Eds), Peanut science and technology. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc., Yoakum, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricker, M. D. & M. K. Beute, 1985. Components of resistance of peanut to early leafspot (Cercospora arachidicola Hori). Plant Dis. (in press).

  • Sowell, G., Jr., D. H., Smith & R. O., Hammons, 1976. Resistance of peanut plant introductions to Cercospora arachidicola. Plant Dis. Rept. 60: 494–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R. G. D. & J. M., Torrie, 1980. Principles and procedues of statistics: A biometrical approach. McGraw-Hill Book co., New York, pp. 550–551.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Creen, C.C., Wynne, J.C. Field and greenhouse evaluation of the components of partial resistance to early leafspot in peanut. Euphytica 35, 561–573 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00021865

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00021865

Index words

Navigation