Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of environmental productivity levels and yield stability on selection strategies in soybean

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Yield data were collected for soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) lines in maturity groups III and IV in 14 environments from 1985 to 1989. The lines in each maturity group were subdivided into three different groups based on the mean yield over all environments, and the genotype × environment interactions were studied for each group. Yield stability of the lines was determined. Effectiveness of selection based on different types of environments was examined.

Productivity level of the environment did not influence the relative ranking of the lines. Significant rank correlations occurred between mean yields in most environments and the overall mean yield, but few similarities occurred in the line rankings among individual environments. High-yielding lines contributed a significantly smaller proportion to the genotype × environment interaction than medium- and low-yielding lines.

A small proportion of the lines were below or above average stability. Significant correlations occurred among stability, overall mean yield, and mean yield in high- and low-yielding environments. However, few significant correlations occurred between individual environment yields and stability in high- or low-yielding environments. Maturity groups differed in yield and stability relationships. Stability in high- and low-yielding environments did not adequately predict stability for each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adegoke A.O. & K.J.Frey, 1987. Grain yield response and stability for oat lines with low-, medium-, and high-yielding ability. Euphytica 36: 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen F.L., R.E.Comstock & D.C.Rasmusson, 1978. Optimal environments for yield testing. Crop Sci. 18: 747–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baihaki A., R.E.Stucker & J.W.Lambert, 1976. Association of genotype × environment interactions with performance level of soybean lines in preliminary yield tests. Crop Sci. 16: 718–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byth D.E., C.R.Weber & B.E.Caldwell, 1969. Correlated truncation selection for yield in soybeans. Crop Sci. 9: 699–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart S.A. & W.A.Russel, 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6: 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay K.W. & G.N.Wilkinson, 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding program. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14: 742–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox P.N. & A.A.Rosielle, 1982. Reducing the influence of environmental main-effects on pattern analysis of plant breeding environments. Euphytica 31: 645–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey K.J., 1964. Adaptation reaction of oat strains selected under stress and non-stress environmental conditions. Crop Sci. 4: 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer I., K.J.Frey & T.Bailey, 1979. Associations among productivity, production response, and stability indexes in oat varieties. Euphytica 28: 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham H.N. & M.S.Kang, 1988. Interrelationships among and repeatability of several stability statistics estimated from international maize trials. Crop Sci. 28: 925–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosielle A.A. & J.Hamblin, 1981. Theoretical aspects of yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Sci. 21: 943–946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saeed M. & C.A.Francis, 1983. Yield stability in relation to maturity in grain sorghum. Crop Sci. 23: 683–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc., 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. 956 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith R.R., D.E.Byth, B.E.Caldwell & C.R.Weber, 1967. Phenotypic stability in soybean populations. Crop Sci. 7: 590–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vela-Cardenas M. & K.J.Frey, 1972. Optimum environment for maximizing heritability and genetic gain from selection. Iowa State J. Sci. 46: 381–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker A.K. & W.R.Fehr, 1978. Yield stability of soybean mixtures and multiple pure stands. Crop Sci. 18: 719–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver D.B., D.L.Thurlow & R.M.Patterson, 1983. Stability parameters of soybean cultivars in maturity groups VI, VII, and VIII. Crop Sci. 23: 569–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead W.F. & F.L.Allen, 1990. High-vs. low-stress yield test environments for selecting superior soybean lines. Crop Sci. 30: 912–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavala-Garcia F., P.J.Bramel-Cox, J.D.Eastin, M.D.Witt & D.J.Andrews, 1992. Increasing the efficiency of crop selection for unpredictable environments. Crop Sci. 32: 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution No. 93-445-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experient Station

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scott, R.A., Champoux, M. & Schapaugh, W.T. Influence of environmental productivity levels and yield stability on selection strategies in soybean. Euphytica 78, 115–122 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00021406

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00021406

Key words

Navigation