Skip to main content
Log in

Tolerance to low leaf water potential in soybean genotypes

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Photosynthetic activity of water stressed plants could be used to assess drought tolerance in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Changes in Photosystem II (PS II) activity during stress integrates the direct effect on PS II activity, analyzed by chlorophyll fluorescence, and responses to decreased CO2 fixation activity due to stomatal closure and photoprotective energy dissipation within the photochemical apparatus. This study analyzed genotypic variation for drought tolerance at low leaf water potentials.

Plants were grown in pots under natural or controlled environmental conditions. A PAM modulation fluorometer was used to measure the effects of dehydration on the activity of the photosystems of detached or attached leaves at 350 μLL-1 ambient CO2. The fluorescence parameters which were examined, were i. the photosystem II efficiency defined by (Fm-Fo)/Fm where Fm is maximum fluorescence with saturating light and Fo the initial fluorescence, ii. the photochemical fluorescence quenching (QP) and iii. the ratio of the fluorescence decrease, 247-1, from the maximum fluorescence Fp to the steady-state fluorescence Ft.

As leaf water potential declined, the decrease in these fluorescence parameters differed between ‘Hodgson’ and ‘Kingsoy’ and paralleled the decrease in stomatal conductance. The parameter Rdf, which is associated with photosystem activity and CO2 exchanges, was the most discriminating factor of the ability of genotypes to withstand low leaf water potential. Seven genotypes showed a wide variability in the response of Rfd to leaf dehydration. Effects observed on detached leaves under irradiance during dehydration were representative of the response of the attached leaves of plants undergoing a soil water deficiency. Readily and rapidly measurable fluorescence parameters, such as Rfd obtained with the PAM modulation fluorometer at the steady-state fluorescence, thus appear to be valuable selection criteria for drought tolerance in soybean.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bunce J.A., 1977. Leaf elongation in relation to leaf water potential in soybean. J. Exp. Bot. 28: 156–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce J.A., 1988. Differential responses of photosynthesis to water stress in three soybean cultivars. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 26: 415–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce J.A., 1989. Water stress as an almost everyday phenomenon. In: A.J. Pascale (Ed.). IV World Soybean Research Conference. pp. 232–237. AASOJA. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demmig B. & O. Björkman, 1987. Comparison of the effect of excessive light on chlorophyll fluorescence (77K) and photon yield of O2 evolution in leaves of higher plants. Planta 171: 171–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastham J., D.M. Oosterhuis & S. Walker, 1984. Leaf water and turgor potential threshold values for leaf growth of wheat. Agron. J. 76: 841–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr W.R., C.E. Caviness, D.T. Burmood & J.S. Pennington, 1971. Stages of development: descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Sci. 11: 929–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindjee W.J.S., Downton D.C. Fork & P.A. Armond, 1981. Chlorophyll a fluorescence transient as an indicator of water potential of leaves. Plant Sci. Lett. 20: 191–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havaux M., M. Ernez & R. Lannoye, 1988. Selection de variétés de blé dur (Triticum durum Desf.) et de blé tendre (Triticum aestivum L.) adaptées à la sécheresse par la mesure de l'extinction de la fluorescence de la chlorophylle in vivo. Agronomie 8: 193–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havaux M. & R. Lannoye, 1983. Chlorophyll fluorescence induction: a sensitive indicator of water stress in maize plants. Irrig. Sci. 4: 147–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havaux M. & R. Lannoye, 1984. Effects of chilling temperatures on prompt and delayed chlorophyll fluorescence in maize and barley leaves. Photosynthetica 18: 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havaux M. & R. Lannoye, 1985. Effect of dehydration on the photochemical function of thylakoids in bean leaves. Photosynthetica 19: 388–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington S.E., R.M. Smillie, A.K. Hardacre & H.A. Eagles, 1983. Using chlorophyll fluorescence in vivo to measure the chilling tolerance of different populations of maize. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 10: 247–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R.C., D.W. Mornhinwerg, D.M. Ferris & J.J. Heitholt, 1987. Leaf photosynthesis and conductance of selected Triticum sp. at different water potentials. Plant Physiol 83: 1014–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautsky H., W. Appel & H. Aman, 1960. Chlorophyll-Fluorescenz und Kohlensaureassimilation: die Fluorescenzkurve und die Photochemie der Pflanze. Biochem Z. 322: 277–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler H.K. & U. Rinderle, 1988. The role of chlorophyll fluorescence in the detection of stress conditions in plants. CRC Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry 19: 529–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan J.M., 1984. Osmoregulation and water stress in higher plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35: 299–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton B.A., N.R. Baker, S.P. Long & D.W. Lawlor, 1981. In vivo photochemical function in water stressed leaves of Zea mays. In: G. Akoyunoglou (Ed.). Photosynthesis. VI. Photosynthesis and productivity, photosynthesis and environment, pp. 209–214. Balaban International Services, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renger G. & U. Schreiber, 1986. Practical applications of fluorometric methods to algae and higher plant research. In: Govindjee J. Amesz & D.C. Fork (Eds.). Light emission by plants and bacteria, pp. 587–619. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholander P.F., U.T. Hammel, E.D. Bradstreet & E.A. Hemmingsen, 1965. Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148: 339–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber U., U. Schliwa & W. Bilger, 1986. Continuous recording of photochemical and non-photochemical fluorescence quenching with a new type of modulation fluorometer. Photosynth. Res. 10: 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seropian C. & C. Planchon, 1984. Physiological responses of six bread wheat and durum wheat genotypes to water stress. Euphytica 33: 757–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloane R.J., R.P. Patterson & T.E. Carter Jr., 1990. Field drought tolerance of a soybean plant introduction. Crop Sci. 30: 118–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smillie R.M. & G.C. Gibbons, 1981. Heat tolerance and heat hardening in crop plants measured by chlorophyll fluorescence. Carlsberg Res. Commun. 46: 395–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smillie R.M. & S.E. Hetherington, 1983. Stress tolerance and stress-induced injury in crop plants measured by chlorophyll fluorescence in vivo. Plant Physiol. 72: 1043–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner N.C., 1986. Crop water deficits. A decade of progress. Adv. Agron. 39: 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vignes D., A. Djekoun & C. Planchon, 1986. Réponses de différents génotypes de soja au déficit hydrique. Can. J. Plant Sci. 66: 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter S.R., J.T. Musick & K.B. Porter, 1988. Evaluation of screening techniques for breeding drought-resistant winter wheat. Crop Sci. 28: 512–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright G.C., R.C.G. Smith & J.M. Morgan, 1983. Differences between two grain sorghum genotypes in adaptation to drought stress. II Physiological response. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 34: 63–651.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Djekoun, A., Planchon, C. Tolerance to low leaf water potential in soybean genotypes. Euphytica 55, 247–253 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00021245

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00021245

Key words

Navigation