Skip to main content
Log in

A 2-D five-noded finite element to model power singularity

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 2-D five-noded finite element which contains a λ singularity is developed. The new element is compatible with cubic standard isoparametric elements. The main advantage of using cubic isoparametric elements over quadratic elements is to reduce the number of elements required to model a structure for results of comparable accuracy. The element is tested on two different examples. In the first example, an edge crack problem is analyzed using two different meshes. The second example is a crack perpendicular to the interface problem which is solved for two different specific composites. The results obtained using the proposed element are compared with those obtained using other existing elements in the literature. Those comparisons demonstrate the superiority of the present technique in using less number of elements and nodes to produce accurate results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.L. Williams, Journal of Applied Mechanics E 19 (1952) 526–528.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T.S. Cook and F. Erdogan, International Journal of Engineering Science 10 (1972) 667–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R.S. Barsoum, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 10 (1976) 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J.E. Akin, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 10 (1976) 1249–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D.M. Tracy and T.S. Cook, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 11 (1977) 1225–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Stern, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 14 (1979) 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Ying, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 18 (1982) 959–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. El Abdl, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 39 (1991) 1061–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S.K. Maitti, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 33 (1992) 1955–1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B.K. Dutta, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 36 (1993) 2287–2303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B.K. Dutta, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 6 (1993) 991–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. O.C. Zienkiewicz, The Finite Element Method in Engineering Science, McGraw-Hill, London (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.D. Cook, D. S. Malkus and M. E. Phesha, Concept and Application of Finite Element Analysis, John Wiley & Sons (1982).

  14. P. Geyskens, W. Marien and G. De Roeck, Computer Analysis Language Modified Version, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (1991).

  15. D.P. Rook and D.J. Cartwright, Compendium of Stress Intensity Factors, Hmso, London (1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wahab, M.A., De Roeck, G. A 2-D five-noded finite element to model power singularity. Int J Fract 74, 89–97 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018577

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018577

Keywords

Navigation