Skip to main content
Log in

The response of CO2 exchange rate to photosynthetic photon flux density for several Populus clones under laboratory conditions

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Photosynthesis Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

No significant differences were found between four mathematical equations describing the response of CO2 exchange rate to photosynthetic photon flux density in seven poplar clones under laboratory conditions. Choice of an optimal equation for poplar may be based on the contemplated aims. High significant differences (at p<0.001) were found among the clones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bhagsari AS (1974) Photosynthesis in peanut (Arachis) genotypes. Ph. D. thesis, Athens, Georgia.

  2. Bjorkman O and Holmgren P (1963) Adaptability of the photosynthetic apparatus to light intensity in ecotypes from exposed and shaded habitats. Physiol Plant 16: 889–914.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bliss CI and James AT (1966) Fitting the rectangular hyperbola. Biometrics 22: 573–602.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boardman NK (1977) Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 28: 355–377.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ceulemans R and Impens I (1979) Study of CO2 exchange processes, resistances to carbon dioxide and chlorophyll content during leaf ontogenesis in poplar. Biol Plant 21: 302–306.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ceulemans R and Impens I (1980) Leaf gas exchange processes and related characteristics of seven poplar clones under laboratory conditions. Can J For Res (in press).

  7. Chartier P (1966) Etude théorique de la photosynthèse globale de la feuille. C R Acad Sci Paris 263: 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chartier P (1970) A model of CO2 assimilation in the leaf. In: Setlik I, ed. Prediction and measurements of photosynthetic productivity, pp. 307–315: Trebon IBP/PP.

  9. Chartier P, Morot-Gaudry JF, Bethenod O and Thomas DA (1977) The net assimilation of C3 and C4 plants as influenced by light and carbon dioxide and an analysis of the role of the gene opaque 2 in young maize. In: Landsberg JJ and Cutting CV, eds. Environmental effects on crop physiology; pp 125–136. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crill PA (1977) The photosynthesis-light curve: a simple analog model. J Theor Biol 64: 503–516.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dornhoff GM and Shibles RM (1970) Varietal differences in net photosynthesis of soybean leaves. Crop Sci 10: 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Duncan WG and Hesketh JD (1968) Net photosynthetic rates, relative leaf growth rates and leaf numbers of 22 races of maize grown at eight temperatures. Crop Sci 8: 670–674.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fasehun F (1975) Effect of light intensity on growth, photosynthesis and nitrate reductase in hybrid poplars. Ph. D. thesis, Iowa State University.

  14. Goudriaan J (1977) Micrometeorologische aspecten van de gewasgroei (in Dutch). PAO-Course, Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen.

  15. Holmgren P, Jarvis PG and Jarvis MS (1965) Resistance to carbon dioxide and water vapour transfer in leaves of different plant species. Physiol Plant 18: 557–573.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koch W, Klein E and Walz H (1968) Elektronische Gaswechsel-Messanlage für Pflanzen in Laboratorium und Freiland. Siemens Zeitschrift 42: 392–404 (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Laisk A (1970) A model of leaf photosynthesis and photorespiration. In: Setlik I, ed. Prediction and measurement of photosynthetic productivity, pp 295–306. Trebon IBP/PP.

  18. Leverenz JW and Jarvis PG (1979) Photosynthesis in Sitka spruce. VIII. The effects of light flux density and direction on the rate of net photosynthesis and the stomatal conductance of needles. J Appl Ecol 16: 919–932.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prioul JL and Chartier P (1977) Partitioning of transfer and carboxylation components of intracellular resistance to photosynthetic CO2 fixation: a critical analysis of the methods used. Ann Bot 41: 789–800.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Proctor JTA, Watson RL and Landsberg JJ (1976) The carbon budget of a young apple tree. J Am Soc Hort Sci 101: 579–582.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rabinowitch EI (1951) Photosynthesis and related processes, Vol. 2. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rose DW and Promnitz LC (1975) Verification of a forest stand simulation model. Angew Bot 49: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thornley JHM (1976) Mathematical models in plant physiology. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Waggoner PE (1977) Simulation modelling of plant physiological processes to predict crop yields. In: Landsberg JJ and Cutting CV, eds. Environmental effects on crop physiology, pp. 351–359. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wilson D and Cooper JP (1969) Effects of light intensity during growth on leaf anatomy and subsequent photosynthesis among contrasting Lolium genotypes. New Phytol 68: 1125–1135.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research was supported by the Instituut tot Aanmoediging van het Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek in Nijverheid en Landbouw (I.W.O.N.L.), Brussels.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ceulemans, R., Impens, I. & Moermans, R. The response of CO2 exchange rate to photosynthetic photon flux density for several Populus clones under laboratory conditions. Photosynth Res 1, 137–142 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018230

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018230

Key words

Navigation