Skip to main content
Log in

The significance of solution flow rate in flowing culture experiments

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Solution flow rate is an important factor to be considered when designing or operating flowing culture equipment. A theoretical model is developed showing that the actual flow rate required for a particular experiment will depend upon many factors, important among which are the nature and concentration of the ion under consideration, the quantity of roots per pot, and the efficiency of these roots in absorbing the test ion under the conditions of the experiment.

The results of experiments conducted at low concentrations of ammonium and nitrate nitrogen clearly demonstrate that flow rates of the order of 1 litre per pot per minute or greater may be required to prevent excessive depletion of the nutrient solution. At lower flow rates, solution depletion resulted in substantial reductions in growth and nitrogen uptake.

Quantities of nutrient solution required for experiments at very high flow rates can be reduced to practical levels by the use of recirculating flowing culture systems, even in installations containing large numbers of pots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asher C. J., Ozanne P. G., and Loneragan J. F., A method for controlling the ionic environment of plant roots. Soil Sci. 100, 149–156 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asher C. J. and Loneragan J. F., Response of plants to phosphate concentration in solution culture. I. Growth and phosphorus content. Soil Sci. 103, 225–233 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asher C J. and Ozanne P. G., Growth and potassium content of plants in solution cultures maintained at constant potassium concentrations. Soil Sci. 103, 155–161 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Becking J. H., On the mechanism of ammonium ion uptake by maize roots. Acta Botan. Neerl. 5, 1–79 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bouldin D. R., Mathematical description of diffusion processes in the soil-plant system. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 25, 476–480 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brewster, J. L., D. Phil Thesis, Oxford (1971) cited by Brewster and Tinker.

  7. Brewster J. L. and Tinker P. B. H., Nutrient flow rates in to roots. Soils and Fert. 35, 355–359.

  8. Cox W. J. and Reisenauer H. M., Growth and ion uptake by wheat supplied nitrogen as nitrate, or ammonium or both. Plant and Soil 38, 363–380 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fishman M. J., Skongstad M. W., and Scarbo Jr. G. F., Diazotization method for nitrate and nitrite. J. Am. Waters and Waste Waters Asso. 56, 633–638 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grasmanis V. O. and Barley K. P., The uptake of nitrate and ammonium by successive zones of the pea radicle. Australian J. Biol. Sci. 22, 1313–1320 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gregory F. G. and Woodford H. K., An apparatus for the study of the oxygen, salt and water uptake of various zones of the root with some preliminary results with Vicia faba. Ann. Botany (N.S.) 3, 147–156 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hackett C., A method of applying nutrients locally to roots under controlled conditions, and some morphological effects of locally applied nitrate on the branching of wheat roots. Australian J. Biol. Sci. 25, 1169–1180 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hai T. van., and Laudelout H., Phosphate uptake by intact rice plants by the continuous flow method at low phosphate concentrations. Soil Sci. 101, 408–417 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hegarty, M. P., Methods of Chemical analysis. (b) Plant material. In Some concepts and methods in sub-tropical pasture research. Commonwealth Agr. Bureau Bull. 47, 211–215 (1968).

  15. Johnston E. S. and Hoagland D. R., Minimum potassium level required by tomato plants grown in water cultures. Soil Sci. 27, 89–109 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lastuvka Z. and Minar J., The relation between nutrient solution concentration and growth and ion absorption of peas, P. sativum. II Accumulation, distribution and utilization of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. Plant and Soil 32, 412–423 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Loneragan J. F. and Asher C. J., Response of plants to phosphate concentration in solution. II Rate of phosphate absorption and its relation to growth. Soil Sci. 103, 311–318.

  18. Lycklama J., The absorption of ammonium and nitrate by perennial rye grass. Acta Botan. Neerl. 12, 361–423 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meijer, C. L. C., Kinetic observations concerning the uptake of ammonium by several cereals. Doctoral Thesis, University of Leyden, The Netherlands (1969).

  20. Minar J. and Lastuvka Z., The dynamics of the accumulation of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in maize and peas in the first growth phases at constant mineral nutrition. Biol. Plantarum, 11, 149–157 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nye P. H., The effect of the nutrient intensity and buffering power of a soil, and the absorbing power, size and root hairs of a root, on nutrient absorption by diffusion. Plant and Soil 25, 81–105 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nye P. H. and Tinker P. B., The concept of a root demand coefficient. J. Applied Ecol. 6, 293–300 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Passioura J. B., A mathematical model for the uptake of ions from the soil solution. Plant and Soil 18, 225–238 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reisenauer H. M., A technique for growing plants at controlled levels of all nutrients. Soil Sci. 108, 350–353 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Robson A. D., Edwards D. G. and Loneragan J. F., Calcium stimulation of phosphate absorption by annual legumes. Australian J. Agr. Research 21, 601–612 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sabet S. A., Abdel Salam M. A. and Lagerwerff J. V., Growth and ion uptake by maize seedlings on solutions variable in phosphate and flow rate. Plant and Soil 21, 94–100 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stiles W., On the interpretation of the results of water culture experiments. Ann. Botany (London) 30, 427–436 (1916).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Teakle L. J. H., The absorption of phosphate from soil and solution cultures. Plant Physiol. 4, 213–232 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Trelease S. F. and Livingston B. E., Continuous renewal of nutrient solution for plants in water cultures. Science 55, 483–486 (1922).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tromp J., Interactions in the absorption of ammonium, potassium and sodium ions by wheat roots. Acta Botan. Neerl. 11, 147–192 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Weatherburn M. W., Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of NH3. Anal. Chem. 39, 971–973 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Weissman G. S., and Keys A. J., Root growth with ammonium and nitrogen in continuous flow nutrient solution. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 96, 149–155 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edwards, D.G., Asher, C.J. The significance of solution flow rate in flowing culture experiments. Plant Soil 41, 161–175 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00017952

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00017952

Keywords

Navigation