Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 103–112 | Cite as

Magnesium influences on the fruit quality of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L. osbeck)

  • G. I. Moss
  • M. L. Higgins
Article

Summary

The influence of magnesium nutrition on fruit quality of sweet orange was investigated in sand culture, and the relationships between Mg and fruit quality were explored in the field.

In the glasshouse, fruit produced over 3 seasons by cuttings, cv. ‘Washington Navel’ grown with high and low Mg nutrient solutions were compared with controls (5.29, 0.37, and 1.62 milliequivalents Mg++/L). High Mg resulted in fruit with a much greater juice acid content than the control, other effects on fruit quality attributes were small and mostly non-significant. High Mg depressed uptake of Ca, but not K indicating a Ca-Mg antagonism. Phosphorus uptake was depressed by both high and low Mg compared to the controls. Leaf concentrations of Mg were: 0.595, 0.178, and 0.392 per cent (means over 3 seasons) in the high, low Mg and controls.

In the field, fruit from ‘Washington Navel’ trees on Rough Lemon rootstock had acid levels that correlated well with leaf K, also with (K+Mg): Ca ratio. Leaf levels of Mg were below 0.4 per cent. ‘Late Valencia’ on Poncirus trifoliata rootstock produced fruit with higher acid levels which correlated with leaf Mg (mostly > 0.4 per cent), also with K+Mg: Ca ratio. Therefore, Mg was a significant predictor of juice acidity when Mg levels were high.

Keywords

Nutrient Solution Acid Level Quality Attribute Fruit Quality Sweet Orange 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anon. Citrus rootstock influences magnesium deficiency. Agric. Gaz. N.S.W. 78, 484 (1967).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bingham F. T., McColloch R. C. and Aldrich D. G., Interrelation of soil potassium and magnesium. California Citrogr. 46, 122, 132–134 (1956).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bouma D., Studies in citrus nutrition. 2. Phosphorus deficiency and fruit quality. Australian J. Agr. Research 7, 261–271 (1956).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cary P. R., The residual effects of nitrogen, calcium and soil management treatment on yield, fruit size and composition of citrus. J. Hort. Sci. 47, 479–491 (1972).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Domnicz A., (Influence of magnesium on the phosphorus economy of plants. Part V Influence of magnesium on the uptake and metabolism of phosphorus in maize and ryegrass). In Polish with English summary. Acta Agr. Silvestr. 1, 47–84 (1961).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Domnicz A., (Influence of magnesium on the phosphorus economy of plants. Part VI The metabolism of phosphorus and the content of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium in plants of maize and oats as related to increasing concentrations of magnesium acetate in the nutrient medium). In Polish with English summary. Acta Agr. Silvestr. 10, 107–120. (1970).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duncan, J., Citrus nutrition survey — M.I.A. I.R.E.C. Farmers Newsl. Griffith No. 105, 17–19. (1969).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Embleton T. W., Magnesium. In Diagnostic Criteria for Plants and Soils (Edit. H. D.Chapman) Univ. California Berkeley pp. 225–263 (1966).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Embleton T. W., Jones W. W., Page A. L. and Platt R. G., Potassium and California citrus. Proc. 1st Intenl. Citrus Symp., Riverside Calif. 3, 1599–1603 (1969).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fudge B. R., The effect of applications of calcium and magnesium upon absorption of potassium by citrus. Proc. Florida Sta. Hort. Soc. 59, 46–51 (1946).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haas A. R. C., and Brusca J. N., Valencia orange fruit size. California Agric. 8(7), 13–14 (1954).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jacoby B., Calcium-magnesium ratios in the root medium as related to magnesium uptake by citrus seedlings. Plant and Soil 15, 74–80 (1961).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M.I.A. Citrus Marketing Association, M.I.A. citrus quality. I.R.E.C. Farmers Newsl. Griffith, No. 100, 20–21 (1970).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moss G. I., The role of potassium in determining fruit quality of sweet orange. Australian J. Exp. Agr. Animal Husb. 12, 195–202 (1972a).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moss, G. I., Citrus fruit quality in the M.I.A. Part I Preliminary investigations. I.R.E.C. Farmers Newsl. Griffith, No. 114, 20–23 (1972b).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pratt P. F. and Harding R. B., Loss of magnesium from soil. California Agric. 11, 11 (1957).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Proctor J., Magnesium as a toxic element. Nature 227, 742–743 (1970).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith P. F., Scudder G. K. and Hrnciar G., Comparison of four varieties of young and old budline oranges grown in sand cultures with three potassium levels. Proc. Florida Sta. Hort. Soc. 83, 6–11 (1970).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Taylor, J. K. and Hooper, P. D., A soil survey of the horticultural soils in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Areas, New South Wales. Bull. C.S.I.R. Melbourne No. 118, (pp. 78–80 quoted). (1938).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tucker, B. M., Basic exchangeable cations in soils. Div. Soils Tech. Paper No. 8, C.S.I.R.O. (1971).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wallace A. and Ashcroft R. T., Correlations of phosphorus and magnesium contents of plants grown in synthetic ion-exchange resins. Agron. J. 48, 219–222 (1956).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weir C. C., Potassium and magnesium nutrition of citrus trees. Trop. Agr. 46, 131–136 (1969).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. I. Moss
    • 1
  • M. L. Higgins
    • 1
  1. 1.CSIRO Division of Irrigation ResearchGriffithAustralia

Personalised recommendations