Skip to main content
Log in

Primary productivity of the River Ely, South Wales, U.K.

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study was carried out on the non-tidal reaches of the River Ely, South Wales, from October 1979 to October 1980. The seasonal variations of the chlorophyll-a content of the phytoplankton was unimodal with one maximum in May and a minimum in December. The chlorophyll-a content varied from 0.277 to 41.259 mg m−3. The primary productivity showed a bimodal seasonal distribution with two maxima in May and September and lower values throughout the remainder of the year, particularly in winter. The value for the primary productivity varied from 0.269 to 24.302 mg C m−3 h−1. A positive correlation was obtained between chlorophyll-a content and primary productivity. The seasonal distribution of the dominant algal species and the saprobity of the River Ely were also studied. The diatom species almost showed a similar seasonal periodicity. Their concentrations were low during the winter months and high during most of the spring and summer months. Many of the dominant diatom species found in the phytoplankton populations were either considered by the other authors as saprobic (Nitzchia palea) or as inhabitants of eutrophic waters (Gomphonema parvulum, Navicula cryptocephala and Synedra ulna). Chlamydomonas spp. were the most abundant green algae followed by Chlorella vulgaris. The effect of sewage effluent disposal and cattle excreta at three of the sampling sites might partly explain the presence of high Chlamydomonas spp. populations at those sites. Physical factors (low flow rates, high transparency and water temperature) and organic pollution at some sampling sites seemed to play an important role in increasing the number of algal species during spring and summer. The non-tidal reaches of the River Ely were found to be β-mesosaprobic above and below Station 5 and α-mesosaprobic at the latter station and therefore, the river can be considered as polluted at Station 5 and mildly polluted at the others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Saadi, H. A. & Antoine, S. E., 1981. Primary productivity and phytoplankton population dynamics in polluted Ashar Canal and Shatt al-Arab River, Basrah (Iraq). Ver. Int. Ver. Limnol., 21: 880–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Public Health Association, 1971. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water. A.P.H.A. 13th ed., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoine, S. E., in press. Limnological investigations on the polluted Rabat Canal and the Shatt al-Arab River at Basrah, Iraq. Nova Hedwigia.

  • Antoine, S. E., Esho, R. T. & Benson-Evans, K., 1984. Studies of the bottom sediments and epipelic algae of the River Ely, South Wales, U.K. Limnologica 16 (1) in press.

  • Aykulu, G., 1978. A quantitative study of the phytoplankton of the River Avon, Bristol. Br. phycol. J. 13: 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, J. L., 1956. The ecology of river algae. Bot. Rev. 22: 291–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, J. L., 1957. An ecological study of the algae of the River Saline, Michigan. Hydrobiologia 9: 361–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodungen, B. V., Brockel, K. V., Smetacek, V. & Zeitzachel, B., 1975. Ecological studies on the the plankton in the Kiel Bight. I. Phytoplankton. Merentutukimuslait. Julk 239: 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, L. J., 1977. Periphyton and phytoplankton in the Sacramento River, California, May 1972 to April 1973. J. Res. U. S. Geol. Survey 5: 547–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budde, H., 1930. Die Algenflora der Ruhr. Arch. Hydrobiol. 21: 559–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, R. W., 1949. Problems of distribution of sessile algae in running water. Verh. Int. Ver. Theoret. Ang. Lim. 10: 98–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertl, M., 1976. Primary production of plankton in the middle reach of the Danube and its relation to the discharge, temperature and chlorophyll-a concentration. Biol. Prace, 22: 81–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertl, M. & Tomajka, J., 1973. Primary production of the phytoplankton in the littorals of the Danube. Hydrobiologia 42: 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertl, M., Juris, S. & Tomajka, J., 1972. Preliminary data about the seasonal changes of phytoplankton from the middle reach of the River Danube. Arch. Hydrobiol. (suppl.) 44: 34–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esho, R. T. & Benson-Evans, K., 1984. Seasonal variations of the dissolved organic matter in the River Ely, South Wales, U. K. Limnologica 16 (1) in press.

  • Fogg, G. E., 1953. The Metabolism of Algae. Methuen & Co. Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furet, J. E., 1979. Algal Studies of the River Wye System. Ph. D. Thesis, University College, Cardiff, University of Wales, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadi, R. A. M., 1981. Algal studies of the River Usk. Ph. D. Thesis, University College, Cardiff, University of Wales, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornting, H., 1951. Biologischer Nachweis der Veruneinigung der Echaz durch Abwasser. Veroff. Landest. Naturschutz Wurtemberg-Hohenzo lern 1950: 272–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huq, M. F., Al-Saadi, H. A. & Hameed, H. A., 1981. Studies on the primary production of the River Shatt al-Arab at Basrah, Iraq. Hydrobiologia 77: 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illies, J., 1961. Versuch einer allgenmein biozonotischen Gleiderung der Fliessgewasser. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol, 46: 205–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe, R. W., 1932. Grundlinien einer allgemeinen Okologie der Diatomeen. Ergebn. Biol. 8: 211–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalczewski, A. & Lack, T. J., 1971. Primary production and respiration of the phytoplankton of the Rivers Thames and Kennet at Reading. Freshwat. Biol. 1: 197–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack, T. J., Youngman, R. E. & Collingwood, R. W., 1978. Observations on a spring bloom in the River Thames. Ver. Int. Ver. Limnol. 20: 1435–1439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, C. J., 1967. Determination of chlorophyll and phaeopigments: Spectro-photometric equations. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12: 343–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, R. L., 1974. Environmental requirements and pollution tolerance of freshwater diatoms. U. S. Environmental protection Agency 670/4–74–005, Cincinnati, Ohio.

  • Marker, A. F. H., 1976a. The benthic algae of some streams in southern England. I. Biomass of the epilithon in some small streams. J. Ecol. 64: 343–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marker, A. F. H., 1976b. The benthic algae of some streams in southern England. II. The primary production of epilithon of some chalk streams. J. Ecol. 64: 359–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. M., 1980. An Ecological Study of the Macroinvertebrate Fauna of the River Ely. Ph. D. Thesis, Dept. of Applied Biology, UWIST, Cardiff, Wales. U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R. J., 1976. Primary production, standing stock and export of organic matter in a Mohave Desert stream. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21: 60–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R. J. & Gerking, S. D., 1975. Interrelationships of light, chlorophyll and primary production in a thermal stream. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 19: 1659–1664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H. T., 1956. Primary production in flowing waters. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1: 102–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, C. M., 1969. A composite rating of algae tolerating organic pollution. J. Phycol. 5: 78–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantle, R. & Buck, H., 1955. Die biologische Uberwechung der Gewasser und die Darstellung der Ergenmosse. Ges. Wasserfach. 96: 604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickert, D. A., Peterson, R. R., McKensie, W. S., Hines, W. G. & Wille, S. A., 1977. Algal condition and potential for future algal problems in the Willamate River, Oregon. Circ. U.S. geol. Surv. 715: G1-G39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryther, J. H. & Yentsch, C. S., 1957. The estimation of phytoplankton production in the ocean from chlorophyll and light data. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2: 281–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryther, J. H. & Yentsch, C. S., 1958. Primary production in continental shelf waters off New York. Limnol. Oceanogr. 3: 327–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, J. D. H., 1960. Measuring the production of marine phytoplankton. Bull. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 122: 1–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, J. D. H. & Parsons, T. R., 1972. A Practical Handbook of Sea Water Analysis. 167. Fish. Res. Bd. Can., 310 pp.

  • Swale, E. M. F., 1964. A study of the phytoplankton of a calcareous river. J. Ecol. 52: 433–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symoens, J.-J., 1957. Les eaux douces de l'Ardenne et des Regions voisines: Les millieux et leur vegetation Algal. Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belg. 89: 111–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, N., Fugi, K. & Parsons, T. R., 1973. Simulation study of phytoplankton photosynthesis and growth in the Fraser River Estuary. Mar. Biol. 19: 102–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, N. W. & Williams, I. L., 1980. A Guide to the Use of Algae for the Biological Surveillance of Rivers. Technical Memorandum No. 20, 34 pp., Water Data, Dept. of the Environment, Reading, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollenweider, R. A., 1971. A Manual of Methods for Measuring Primary Productivity in Aquatic Environments. IBP Handbook 13, Philadelphia, Pensylvania, USA. 213 pp.

  • Williams, R. B. & Murdoch, M. B., 1966. Phytoplankton production and chlorophyll concentration in the Beaufort, Channel, North Carolina. Limnol. Oceanogr. 11: 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yentsch, C. S. & Ryther, J. H., 1959. Relative significance of the net phytoplankton and nannoplankton in the waters f of Vineyard Sound. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer. 24: 231–238.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Esho, R.T., Benson-Evans, K. Primary productivity of the River Ely, South Wales, U.K.. Hydrobiologia 107, 141–153 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00017429

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00017429

Keywords

Navigation