Skip to main content
Log in

Constant stress intensity factors through closed-loop control

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new way of obtaining a constant stress intensity factor is achieved for any test specimen geometry subjected to closed-loop control loading. In contrast to using only load or displacement control the method draws on combined feedback from both displacement and load sensing, reducing the variation in the stress intensity factor by two decades compared to that if tested under constant load or displacement. A change in the signal mix ratio for a rectangular compact tension specimen is equivalent to changing the angle of a tapered compact tension specimen. This method can eliminate the need for the use of ‘complex’ geometries or for geometries in which measured crack lengths are used in conjunction with a computer or some other means to adjust the loading continuously for achieving a constant stress intensity factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Mostovoy, P.B. Crosley and E.J. Ripling, Journal of Materials 2 (1967) 661–681.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.S. Rivlin and A.G. Thomas, Journal of Polymer Science 10 (1953) 291–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J.O. Outwater and D.G. Gerry, Journal of Adhesion 1 (1969) 290–298.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Schijve and A.U.De Koning, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 9 (1977) 331–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Huculak, Journal of Testing and Evaluation 14 (1986) 200–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S.R. Swanson, F. Cicci and W. Hoppe, in Fatigue Crack Propagation, American Society for Testing and Materials (1967) 312–362. ASTM STP 415.

  7. J. Zuidema and M. Mannesse, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 34 (1989) 445–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P.S. Nicholson, Journal of the American Ceramics Society 73 (1990) 1800–1802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D.A. Dillard, J.Z. Wang and H. Parvatareddy, Journal of Adhesion 41 (1993) 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.E. Srawley and B. Gross, Materials Research and Standards 7 (1967) 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T.P. Neal, Performance Estimation for Electrohydraulic Control Systems. Technical Bulletin 126, Moog Inc. Controls Division, East Aurora (1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pulos, G.C., Knauss, W.G. Constant stress intensity factors through closed-loop control. Int J Fract 63, 101–112 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00017280

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00017280

Keywords

Navigation