Skip to main content
Log in

Continuum and micromechanics treatment of constraint in fracture

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two complementary methodologies are described to quantify the effects of crack-tip stress triaxiality (constraint) on the macroscopic measures of elastic-plastic fracture toughness J and Crack-Tip Opening Displacement (CTOD). In the continuum mechanics methodology, two parameters J and Q suffice to characterize the full range of near-tip environments at the onset of fracture. J sets the size scale of the zone of high stresses and large deformations while Q scales the near-tip stress level relative to a high triaxiality reference stress state. The material's fracture resistance is characterized by a toughness locus J c (Q) which defines the sequence of J-Q values at fracture determined by experiment from high constraint conditions (Q∼0) to low constraint conditions (Q<0). A micromechanics methodology is described which predicts the toughness locus using crack-tip stress fields and critical J-values from a few fracture toughness tests. A robust micromechanics model for cleavage fracture has evolved from the observations of a strong, spatial self-similarity of crack-tip principal stresses under increased loading and across different fracture specimens. We explore the fundamental concepts of the J-Q description of crack-tip fields, the fracture toughness locus and micromechanics approaches to predict the variability of macroscopic fracture toughness with constraint under elastic-plastic conditions. Computational results are presented for a surface cracked plate containing a 6:1 semielliptical, a=t/4 flaw subjected to remote uniaxial and biaxial tension. Crack-tip stress fields consistent with the J-Q theory are demonstrated to exist at each location along the crack front. The micromechanics model employs the J-Q description of crack-front stresses to interpret fracture toughness values measured on laboratory specimens for fracture assessment of the surface cracked plate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.W. Hutchinson, Journal of Applied Mechanics 50 (1983) 1042–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.R. Rice, Journal of Applied Mechanics 35 (1968) 379–386.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.R. Rice and G.F. Rosengren, Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids 16 (1968) 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J.W. Hutchinson, Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids 16 (1968) 13–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R.M. McMeeking and D.M. Parks, in Elastic-Plastic Fracture, ASTM STP 668, J.D. Landes J.A. Begley, and G.A. Clark (eds.) (1979) 175–194.

  6. C.F. Shih and M.D. German, International Journal of Fracture 17, No. 1 (1981) 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.M. Al-Ani and J.W. Hancock, Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids 39 (1991) 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. W.A. Sorem, R.H. Dodds and S.T. Rolfe, International Journal of Fracture 47 (1991) 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J.D.G. Sumpter, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures 10, No. 6 (1987) 479–493.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.D.G. Sumpter and A.T. Forbes, ‘Constraint Based Analysis of Shallow Cracks in Mild Steel’, Proceedings of the International Conference on Shallow Crack Fracture Mechanics Tests and Applications, TWI, Cambridge, England, September 1992.

  11. T.J. Theiss and J.R. Bryson, ‘Influence of Crack Depth on Fracture Toughness of Reactor Pressure Vessel Steel’, to appear in the ASTM STP resulting from the Symposium on Constraint Effects in Fracture, held May 8–9 1991, Indianapolis, Indiana.

  12. P.M.S.T. DeCastro, J. Spurrier and P. Hancock, in Fracture Mechanics, ASTM STP 677, C.W. Smith (ed.) (1979) 486–497.

  13. N.P. O'Dowd and C.F. Shih, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 39, No. 8 (1991) 989–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. N.P. O'Dowd and C.F. Shih, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids Pt. II 40 (1992) 939–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. C.F. Shih, N.P. O'Dowd and M.T. Kirk, ‘A Framework for Quantifying Crack Tip Constraint’, to appear in the ASTM STP resulting from the Symposium on Constraint Effects in Fracture, held May 8–9 1991, Indianapolis, Indiana.

  16. N.P. O'Dowd and C.F. Shih, ‘Two-Parameter Fracture Mechanics: Theory and Applications’, to appear in the ASTM STP resulting from the National Fracture Symposium on Fracture Mechanics, Gatlinburg, Tennessee, June 29-July 3, 1992.

  17. Y.C. Li and T.C. Wang, Scientia Sinica (Series A) 29 (1986) 941–955.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S.M. Sharma and N. Aravas, Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids 39 (1991) 1043–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. L. Xia, T.C. Wang and C.F. Shih, Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids, to appear.

  20. R.O. Ritchie and A.W. Thompson, Metallurgical Transactions A 16A (1985) 233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R.O. Ritchie, J.F. Knott and J.R. Rice, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 21 (1973) 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. P.F. Thomason, Ductile Fracture of Metals. Pergamon Press, Oxford, England (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. Betegon and J.W. Hancock, Journal of Applied Mechanics 58 (March 1991) 104–113.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Z.-Z. Du and J.W. Hancock, Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids 39 (1991) 555–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J.W. Hancock, W.G. Reuter and D.M. Parks, ‘Constraint and Toughness Parameterized by T-Stress’, to appear in the ASTM STP resulting from the Symposium on Constraint Effects in Fracture, held May 8–9 1991(a), Indianapolis, Indiana.

  26. D.M. Parks, Topics in Fracture and Fatigue, Springer Verlag (1992) to appear.

  27. Y.Y. Wang, ‘On the Two-Parameter Characterization of Elastic-Plastic Crack-Front Fields in Surface-Cracked Plates’, to appear in the ASTM STP resulting from the Symposium on Constraint Effects in Fracture, held May 8–9 1991(a), Indianapolis, Indiana.

  28. Y.Y. Wang, ‘A Two-Parameter Characterization of Elastic-Plastic Crack-Tip and Application to Cleavage Fracture’, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MIT, 1991.

  29. M.T. Kirk and R.H. Dodds, ‘Approximate Techniques for Prediction of Size Effects on Cleavage Fracture Toughness’, to appear in the ASTM STP resulting from the National Fracture Symposium on Fracture Mechanics, Gatlinburg, Tennessee, June 29–July 3, 1992.

  30. R.H. Dodds, T.L. Anderson and M.T. Kirk, International Journal of Fracture 48 (1991) 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  31. T.L. Anderson and R.H. Dodds, Journal of Testing and Evaluation (1991) 123–134.

  32. J.R. Rice and M.A. Johnson, in Inelastic Behavior of Solids, M.F. Kanninen et al. (eds.), McGraw-Hill, New York (1970), 641–671.

    Google Scholar 

  33. R.M. McMeeking, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 25 (1977) 357–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. M.L. Williams, Journal of Applied Mechanics 24 (1957) 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  35. B.A. Bilby, G.E. Cardew, M.R. Goldthorpe and I.C. Howard, Institution'of Mechanical Engineers, London, England, (1988) 36–46.

  36. G. Harlin and J.R. Willis, Proceedings of the Royal Society A415 (1988) 197–226.

    Google Scholar 

  37. F.M. Beremin, Metallurgical Transactions 14A (1983) 2277–2287.

    Google Scholar 

  38. K. Wallin, T. Saario and K. Torronen, Metal Science 18 (1984) 13–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. T.L. Anderson and D. Stienstra, Journal of Testing and Evaluation 17 (1989) 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  40. K. Wallin, ‘Statistical Aspects of Constraint with Emphasis on Testing and Analysis of Laboratory Specimens in the Transition Region’, to appear in the ASTM STP resulting from the Symposium on Constraint Effects in Fracture, held May 8–9 1991, Indianapolis, Indiana.

  41. M.T. Kirk, K.C. Koppenhoeffer and C.F. Shih, ‘Effect of Constraint on Specimen Dimensions Needed to Obtain Structurally Relevant Toughness Measures’, to appear in the ASTM STP resulting from the Symposium on Constraint Effects in Fracture, held May 8–9 1991, Indianapolis, Indiana.

  42. J. Herrens and D.T. Read, Fracture Behavior ofa Pressure Vessel Steel in the Ductile-to-Brittle Transition Region, NISTIR 88–3099, National Institute for Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, December 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  43. M.T. Miglin, C.S. Wade and W.A. Van Der Sluys, Fracture Mechanics: Twenty-First Symposium, ASTM STP 1074, J.P. Gudas, J.A. Joyce, and E.M. Hackett (eds.) (1990) 238–263.

  44. B.R. Bass, D.K.M. Shum and J.K. Walker, ‘Constraint Effects on Fracture Toughness for Circumferentially Oriented Cracks in Reactor Pressure Vessels’, NUREG/CR-6008, ORNL/TM-12131, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, June 1992.

  45. B. Moran and C.F. Shih, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 27 (1987) 615–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. C.F. Shih, B. Moran and T. Nakamura, International Journal of Fracture 30 (1986) 79–102.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dodds, R.H., Fong Shih, C. & Anderson, T.L. Continuum and micromechanics treatment of constraint in fracture. Int J Fract 64, 101–133 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00016693

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00016693

Keywords

Navigation