Skip to main content

The effect of light on Lake Herring (coregonus artedi) reactive volume

Abstract

The lake herring (Coregonus artedi) is an important coldwater planktivore in the Laurentian Great Lakes and in smaller inland lakes in portions of Canada and the northern United States. Lake herring cruise the pelagia and feed selectively in both gulping and particulate modes. They are visual predators in environments with adequate illumination. Visual predation by fish consists of a series of discrete steps. We studied the first step in the predation sequence, reaction to prey, at light intensities of 2–1500 Lx in a simulated pelagic environment at 10–13°C. We measured lake herring reactive distances, the distance at which a prey item will be detected and attacked, to live Limnocalanus macrurus, a natural prey of lake herring in Lake Superior. We used the reactive distances and associated angles of bearing and elevation, which described the location of the prey relative to the lake herring, to calculate reactive volume. This reactive volume can be envisioned as an irregular sphere surrounding the fish, within which prey are detected and attacked. All of the attacks on prey occurred in the anterior portions of the sagittal and lateral planes of the lake herring, as would be expected for a pelagic, cruising fish. The reactive volume surrounding the lake herring was generally spherical, but was more irregular than the simple spheres, hemispheres, cylinders, cones or other geometries assumed in previous studies. The reactive distances and the reactive volume changed with light intensity and were significantly smaller at 2–10 Lx than at 40–1500 Lx. At 40–1500 Lx, the reactive volume was expanded over that observed at 2–10 Lx laterally and caudally. Collectively our results indicate that lake herring can visually forage most effectively in environments with light levels >10 Lx.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Baldwin, N.S., R.W. Saalfeld, M.A. Ross & H.J. Buettner, 1979. Commercial fish production in the Great Lakes 1867–1977. Great Lakes Fish. Comm. Tech. Report No. 3. Ann Arbor, MI.

  • Beeton, A.M., 1969. Changes in the environment and biota of the Great Lakes. pp. 150–187 in Eutrophication: Causes, Consequences, Correctives. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, J.A., 1988. Diel vertical migration of the opossum shrimp Mysis relicta in Lake Superior: Observations and sampling from the Johnson-Sea-Link II submersible. Bull. Mar. Sci. 43: 730–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J.C.H., 1969. Life cycles of Limnocalanus macrurus and Senecella calanoides, and seasonal abundance and vertical distributions of various planktonic copepods, in Parry Sound, Georgian Bay. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 26: 2543–2560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confer, J.L., G.L. Howick, M.H. Corzette, S.I., Kramer, S. Fitzgibbon, S. & R. Landesberg, 1978. Visual predation by planktivores. Oikos 31: 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confer, J.L. & P.I. Blades, 1975. Omnivorous zooplankton and planktivorous fish. Limnol. Oceanogr. 20: 570–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J.B., 1977. Seasonal and depth distribution of Limnocalanus macrurus at a site on western Lake Superior. J. Great Lakes Res. 3: 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbrack, R.L. & L.M. Dill, 1984. Three-dimensional prey reaction field of the juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41: 1176–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers, D.M., 1982. Planktivore preference by prey size. Ecology 63: 381–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M.B., 1981. Mechanisms of size selectivity by planktivorous fish: a test of hypotheses. Ecology 62: 571–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerritsen, J. & J.R. Strickler, 1977. Encounter probabilities and community structure in zooplankton: a mathematical model. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 34: 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S., 1959a. Some characteristics of simple prey types of predation and parasitism. Can. Ent. 41: 385–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S., 1959b. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Can. Ent. 91: 293–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J., 1981. Searching for zooplankton just outside Snell's window. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26: 1168–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J., 1980. Alewives (Alosa psuedoharengus) and Ciscoes Coregonus artedii as selective and non-selective planktivores. In Kerfoot, W.C. (ed.), Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities. Univ. Press of New England, Hanover, NH: 580–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J., 1978. Feeding-behavior repertoire of the Alewife, Alosa pseudoharengus, and the Ciscoes Coregonus hoyi and C. artedii. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 35: 249–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J., W.R. Jones, A. Whang & P.E. Oshel, 1996. Use of the lateral line in particulate feeding in the dark by juvenile alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. in press.

  • Lawrie, A.H., 1978. The fish community of Lake Superior. J. Great Lakes Res. 4: 513–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, K.T., J.K. Wetterer & N.G. Hairston, 1985. Fish size, visual resolution, and prey selectivity. Ecology 66: 1729–1735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luecke, C. & W.J. O'Brien, 1981. Prey location volume of a planktivorous fish: a new measure of prey vulnerability. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38: 1264–1270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D.C., 1991. Design and Analysis of Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, W.J., 1987. Planktivory by freshwater fish: thrust and parry in the pelagia. In Kerfoot, W.C. & A. Sih (eds), Predation, Direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. Univ. Press of New England, Hanover, NH: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, W.J., 1979. The predator-prey interaction of planktivorous fish and zooplankton. Am. Sci. 67: 572–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, W.J., N.A. Slade & G.L. Vinyard, 1976. Apparent size as the determinant of prey selection by bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Ecology 57: 1304–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, D. & W.J. O'Brien, 1982. Planktivorous feeding ecology of Arctic Grayling (Thymallus articus). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39: 475–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinyard, G.L. & W.J. O'Brien, 1976. Effects of light and turbidity on the reactive distance of Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 33: 2845–2949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetterer, J.K. & C.J. Bishop, 1985. Planktivore prey selection: the reactive field volume model vs. the apparent size model. Ecology 66: 457–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D.I. & W.J. O'Brien, 1984. The development of a tactical model of the planktivorous feeding of white crappie (Pomoxis annularis). Ecol. Monogr. 54: 65–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J.H., 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Link, J., Edsall, T.A. The effect of light on Lake Herring (coregonus artedi) reactive volume. Hydrobiologia 332, 131–140 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00016692

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00016692

Key words

  • planktivory
  • reactive volume
  • predation
  • fish-feeding ecology
  • light intensity
  • lake herring