Skip to main content
Log in

Assumed Amphi-Atlantic distribution of Oxyurella tenuicaudis (Cladocera, Chydoridae) denied by a new species from North America

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Up to now the taxon Oxyurella tenuicaudis, described from Norway, has been claimed to occur in North America as well. However, our close study and comparison of populations from the two continents show them to be different in many major morphological details, involving principally the female and male postabdomens, labrum, headpore configuration, and the external sculpturing of the shell. The new species O. brevicaudis occurs from the Maritimes to Manitoba in southern Canada, southward throughout the region east of the Plains to Guatemala and possibly Panama. Two enigmatic outlier populations are known from the Northwest Territories and the State of Washington. A greater frequency of occurrence in the southeastern states compared with southern Canada, together with its extension of range into the Tropics, suggests that this taxon prefers the lower north temperate latitudes. Although widely distributed, its frequency of occurrence is very low.

Just as interesting as the characters that separate these two species are those that unite them into the cohesive genus Oxyurella. Although the few other species in the genus have not been studied in sufficient detail, fragmentary information suggests that they also conform to the pattern of commonality emerging from this study. These potential generic characters include: 1) only one seta on the outer distal lobe of trunklimb I and two on the inner distal lobe; 2) 4 median headpores not connected to one another by any channel or raised chitinous ridge, although the light microscope shows irregular dark thickenings around each pore and occasional connections between the three anterior pores; 3) antennules of the male being very similar to those of the female except for the 2-segmented male seta and the addition of one more aesthetascs at the tip, for a total of 10 compared with the typical number of 12 in chydorid males; 4) a significant reduction in size of the seta arising from the middle endopodite segment of the male antenna as compared with the female; 5) use of the entire shell as an ephippium, without any external modification but with an internal foam-like mass secreted (?) into the brood pouch around the egg.

Other populations outside western Europe claimed to be O. tenuicaudis need to be studied closely to evaluate their presumed conspecificity. Very likely at least some will be found to be different. As aids in this process of evaluation, besides specimens from Gjennestadvannet placed in various museums, including the Zoological Museum in Oslo, a lectotype has been selected and designated herein from among the few specimens mounted and studied by G. O. Sars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barber, S. B., 1961. Chemoreception and thermoreception. In: Waterman, T. H. (ed.). The physiology of Crustacea. 11. Sense organs, integration, and behavior. Academic Press, N. Y.: 109–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardach, J. E., 1954. Plankton Crustacea from the Thelon Watershed, N.W.T. Can. Fld. Nat. 68: 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, M. W., 1975. Crustacean zooplankton ecology of the Atchafalaya River Basin, Louisiana. MS thesis, Louisiana St. Univ., 11 + 97 pp.

  • Birge, E. A., 1910. Notes on Cladocera. IV. Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 16: 1017–1066.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birge, E. A., 1918. The water fleas (Cladocera). In: Ward, H. B. & G. C. Whipple (eds.). Fresh-water Biology. J. Wiley & Sons, N. Y.: 676–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandlova, J., Brandl, Z. & Fernando, C. H., 1972. The Cladocera of Ontario with remarks on some species and distribution. Can. J. Zool. 50: 1373–1403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, V., 1938. Dritter Bericht über die von Dr. O. Schubart in Basilien gesammelten Onychura. Zool. Anz. 122: 94–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J. L., 1959. Cladocera. In: Edmondson, W. T. (ed.). Fresh-water Biology, 2nd ed. J. Wiley & Sons, N. Y.: 587–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chengalath, R., 1980. Survey of the littoral Cladocera of Canada. Mimeogr. Ottawa, iv, 205 pp.

  • Chien, S. M., 1969. Summer Cladocera of the Pearl River System, Mississippi. M.S. thesis, Miss. St. Univ., vi, 137 pp.

  • Daday, J., 1898. Mikroskopische Süsswasserthiere aus Ceylon. Természetr. Füz. 21: 1–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daday, J., 1905. Untersuchungen über die Süsswasser-Mikro-fauna Paraguays. Zoologica, Stuttgart 18: 1–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, G. S., 1926. Entomostraca from the Panama Canal Zone with description of one new species. Occ. Pap. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 174: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dybowski, B. & Grochowski, M., 1894. O Lynceidach czyli Tonewkach fanny krajowej. Kosmos 19: 376–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flössner, D., 1972. Krebstiere, Crustacea. Kiemen- und Blattfüsser, Branchiopoda; Fischläuse, Branchiura. Tierwelt Deutschlands 60: 1–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flössner, D. & Frey, D. G., 1970. A morphological comparison of European and North American populations of Alona rustica Scott and Alona costata Sars. Limnologica 7: 325–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. G., 1960. The ecological significance of cladoceran remains in lake sediments. Ecology 41: 684–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. G., 1966. Phylogenetic relationships in the family Chydoridae. J. mar. biol. Ass. India, Proc. Symp. Crustacea 1: 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. G., 1975. Subgeneric differentiation within Eurycercus (Cladocera, Chydoridae) and a new species from northern Sweden. Hydrobiologia 46: 263–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. G., 1980a. On the plurality of Chydorus sphaericus (O. F. Muller) (Cladocera, Chydoridae), and designation of a neotype from Sjaelsø, Denmark. Hydrobiologia 69: 83–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. G., 1980b. The non-swimming chydorid Cladocera of wet forests, with descriptions of a new genus and two new species. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 65: 613–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. G., 1982a. Relocation of Chydorus barroisi and related species (Cladocera, Chydoridae) to a new genus and description of two new species. Hydrobiologia 86: 231–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. G., 1982b. Contrasting strategies of gamogenesis in northern and southern populations of Cladocera. Ecology 63: 223–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. G., 1982c. Questions concerning cosmopolitanism in Cladocera. Arch. Hydrobiol. 93: 484–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. G., 1982d. The reticulated species of Chydorus (Cladocera, Chydoridae): two new species, with suggestions of convergence. Hydrobiologia 93: 255–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. G., 1982e. G. O. Sars and the Norwegian Cladocera: a continuing frustration. Hydrobiologia 96: 267–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulden, C. E., 1966a. La Aguada de Santa Ana Vieja: an interpretative study of cladoceran microfossils. Arch. Hydrobiol. 62: 373–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulden, C. E., 1966b. The animal microfossils, p. 84–120. In: Cowgill, U. M. et al. (eds.). The history of Laguna de Petenxil, a small lake in northern Guatemala. Mem. Connecticut Acad. Arts Sci. 17: 1–126.

  • Hann, B. J., 1975. Taxonomy of Chydoridae in Ontario and genus Chydorus (worldwide). MS thesis, Univ. Waterloo, Ont. xiii, 234 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellich, B., 1877. Die Cladoceren Bohmens. Arch. Landesdurchf. Bohm. 3: 1–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, H. V., 1962. Blattfusskrebse (Phyllopoden: echte Blattftisser und Wasserflohe). Kosmos, Stuttgart, 130 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, C. C., 1943. The Cladocera and Ostracoda of Reelfoot Lake. J. Tenn. Acad. Sci. 18: 49–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W. H., 1954. Cladocera of Oklahoma. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Okla., 5 + 52 pp.

  • Keen, R., 1976. Population dynamics of the chydorid Cladocera of a southern Michigan marl lake. Hydrobiologia 48: 269–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kořinek, V., in prep. List of 47 taxa of Cladocera recovered from samples collected during the Cuban-Czechoslovakian Expeditions in 1964–66.

  • Kubersky, E. S., 1977. Worldwide distribution and ecology of Alonopsis (Cladocera: Chydoridae) with a description of Alonopsis americana sp. nov. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 62: 649–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilljeborg, W., 1901. Cladocera Sueciae. Nova Acta r. Soc. scient. upsal. 3: 6 + 701 pp.

  • Mackin, J. G., 1931. Studies on the Crustacea of Oklahoma: notes on the Cladoceran fauna. Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci. 11: 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, W. P., 1964. The distribution of cladoceran remains in surficial sediments from three northern Indiana lakes. Invest. Indiana Lakes Streams 6: 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, P. E., 1867. Danmarks Cladocera. Naturhist. Tidsskr., Kjobenhavn 3: 53–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennak, R. W., 1953. Fresh-water invertebrates of the United States. Ronald Press, N. Y., 9 + 769 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennak, R. W., 1978. Fresh-water invertebrates of the United States, 2nd ed. J. Wiley & Sons, N. Y., 15 + 803 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sars, G. O., 1861. Om de i Christiania's Omegn forekommende Ferskvandskrebsdyr. I og II. Unpubl. manuscript in Manuscript Dep., Univ. Oslo Libr., 340 pp.

  • Sars, G. O., 1862a. Hr. Studios. medic. G. O. Sars meddeelte en of talrige Afbildninger ledsaget Oversigt of de of ham i Omegnen of Christiania iagttagne Crustacea Cladocera. Forh. VidenskSelsk. Krist. (1861): 144–167.

  • Sars, G. O., 1962b. Hr. Studios. medic. G. O. Sars fortsatte sit Foredrag over de of ham i Omegnen of Christiania iagttagne Crustacea cladocera. Forh. VidenskSelsk. Krist. (1861): 250–302.

  • Sars, G. O., 1901. Contributions to the knowledge of the freshwater Entomostraca of South America, as shown by artificial hatching from dried materials. Part l. Cladocera. Arch. Math. Naturv. 23: 1–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoedler, E., 1858. Die Branchiopoden der Umgegend von Berlin. Jahresber. Louisenstadt. Realschule, 28 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoedler, E., 1862. Ueberdie Lynceiden und Polyphemidender Umgegend von Berlin. Jahresber. Dorotheenstädtische Realschule, 56 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoedler, E., 1863. Neue Beitrage zur Naturgeschichte der Cladoceren. August Hirschwald, Berlin, 80 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scourfield, D. J., 1896. The olfactory setae of the Cladocera. J. Quekett microsc. Club 6: 280–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan, R. K., 1969. Life cycle of a chydorid clad oceran, Pleuroxus denticulatus Birge. Hydrobiologia 34: 513–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, N. N., 1971. Chydoridae Fauny Mira. Fauna SSSR, Nov. Ser. 101, Rakoobraznyye, T. 1, Vyp. 2 Izdatel'stvo ‘Nauka’, Leningrad, 531 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šŕamek-Hušek, R., 1962. řád Cladocera-Perloočky. In: Šrámek-Hušek, R., M. Straškraba & J. Brtek (eds.). Lupenonožci-Branchipoda. Fauna CSSR, Svazek 16, Česk. Akad. Věd, Praha: 174–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromsten, F. A., 1920. Cladocera of the Okoboji Region. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci. 27: 265–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Synerholm, C. C., 1974. The chydorid Cladocera from surface lake sediments in Minnesota and North Dakota. M.S. thesis, Univ. Minn., 37 pp.

  • Wilson, M. S., 1959. Free-living Copepoda: Calanoida. In: Edmondson, W. T. (ed.). Fresh-water Biology, 2nd ed. J. Wiley & Sons, N. Y.: 738–794.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

presently holding a visiting faculty position at Indiana University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michael, R.G., Frey, D.G. Assumed Amphi-Atlantic distribution of Oxyurella tenuicaudis (Cladocera, Chydoridae) denied by a new species from North America. Hydrobiologia 106, 3–35 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00016413

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00016413

Keywords

Navigation