Skip to main content
Log in

Errors associated with using Archimedes' principle to determine mass and volume of small aquatic organisms

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Archimedes' principle can be effectively applied to measure the mass and volume of small aquatic organisms by weighing the organism in waters of two densities, and then comparing those values with the weights of a plummet weighed in the same waters. However, the weight-in-water measurements are subject to error, and this work outlines how to calculate the standard errors of organism mass and volume, and a straightforward approach to calculating organism mass and volume itself. Guidance for the design of a plummet and setting a water density difference that minimizes the standard errors of the measurements is also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barford, N. C., 1985. Experimental measurements: Precision, error, and truth. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 159 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, S. H., 1981. A density-gradient column for determining the specific gravity of fish eggs with particular reference to eggs of the mackerel Scomber scombrus. Mar. Biol. 63: 101–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling, M. S. & K. M. Wilbur, 1993. A method for measuring growth in living barnacles (Crustacea, Cirripedia). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 73: 723–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M. L., J. W. McKnight & C. R. Blem, 1995. Effect of size and sex on buoyancy in the oyster toadfish. Mar. Biol. 123: 401–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. H., 1981. Coordination of respiratory and hydrostatic functions of the swimbladder in the central mudminnow, Umbra limi. J. exp. Biol. 92: 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. H. & H. M. Holst, 1992. Buoyancy regulation by the sticklebacks Culaea inconstans and Pungitius pungitius in response to different salinities and water densities. Can. J. Zool. 70: 1590–1594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. H. & R. C. Waldick, 1995. Ontogenetic buoyancy changes and hydrostatic control in larval anurans. Copeia 861–870.

  • Gee, J. H. & P. A. Gee, 1995. Aquatic surface respiration, buoyancy control and the evolution of air-breathing in gobies (Gobiidae: Pisces). J. exp. Biol. 198: 79–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Power, J. H., W. L. Morrison & J. Zeringue, 1991. Determining the mass, volume, density, and weight in water of small zooplankters. Mar. Biol. 110: 267–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, J. H. & P. J. Walsh, 1992. Metabolic scaling, buoyancy, and growth in larval Atlantic menhaden, Brevoortia tyrannus. Mar. Biol. 112: 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. R., 1981. An introduction to error analysis: The study of uncertainties in physical measurement. University Science Books, Mill Valley, California, 270 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildish, D. J. & B. Frost, 1991. Volumetric growth in gammaridean amphipoda. Hydrobiologia 223: 171–176.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Power, J.H. Errors associated with using Archimedes' principle to determine mass and volume of small aquatic organisms. Hydrobiologia 335, 141–145 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00015275

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00015275

Key words

Navigation