Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of nutrient availability on water hyacinth standing crop and detritus deposition

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nutrient-enriched water hyacinths were stocked in outdoor tanks and cultured under both high nutrient (HN) and low nutrient (LN) regimes for 10 months. Seasonal changes in standing crop biomass and morphology of LN water hyacinths were similar to those of HN water hyacinths, despite a ten-fold between-treatment difference in N availability and a two-fold difference in average plant N concentrations (1.0 and 2.0% for LN and HN plants, respectively). Tissue N accumulated by the LN plants prior to stocking helped support standing crop development during the 10 month study.

In both HN and LN treatments, the rate of detritus deposition, or the sloughing of dead plant tissues from the mat, was lower than the actual detritus production rate because of the retention of dead ‘aerial’ tissues (laminae and petioles) in the floating mat. The retention of laminae and petioles may serve as a nutrient conservation mechanism, since nutrients released from decomposing tissues in the mat-water environment may be assimilated by adjacent plants. The average rate of detritus deposition (both dry matter and N) by LN water hyacinths (1.2 g dry wt. m−2 day−1 and 0.017 g N m−2 day−1) was lower than that of HN plants (3.0 g dry wt. m−2 day−1 and 0.075 g N m−2 day−1) during the study. Low detrital N losses by the water hyacinth probably enhance the survival of this species in aquatic systems which receive nutrient inputs intermittently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A. P. H. A., 1971. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 13th ed. Am. Publ. Health Ass., Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, C. E., 1976. Accumulation of dry matter, nitrogen and phosphorus by cultivated water hyacinths. Econ. Bot. 30: 51–56.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Center, T. D. & N. R. Spencer, 1981. The phenology and growth of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes [Mart.] Solms) in a eutrophic north-central Florida lake. Aquat. Bot. 10: 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBusk, T. A., 1982. Standing crop changes, detritus production and decomposition of Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms. M. S. Thesis, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne. 93 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBusk, T. A. & F. E. Dierberg, 1984. Effect of nitrogen and fiber content on the decomposition of the water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes [Mart.] Solms). Hydrobiologia 118: 199–204.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dierberg, F. E. & P. L. Brezonik, 1981. Nitrogen fixation (acetylene reduction) associated with decaying leaves of pond cypress (Taxodium distichum var nutans) in a natural and a sewage-enriched cypress dome. Appl. Envir. Microbiol. 41: 1413–1418.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudet, J., 1977. Uptake, accumulation and loss of nutrients by papyrus in tropical swamps. Ecology 58: 415–422.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lugo, A. E., S. A. Jones, K. R. Dugger & T. L. Morris, 1979. Ecological approaches to the control of aquatic weeds. Geol. Ecol. Trop. 3: 193–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogwada, R. A., K. R. Reddy & D. A. Graetz, 1984. The effects of aeration and temperature on nutrient regeneration from selected aquatic macrophytes. J. Envir. Qual. 13: 239–243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parnas, H., 1975. Model for decomposition of organic material by microorganisms. Soil Biol. Biochem. 7: 161–169.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Penfound, W. T. & T. T. Earle, 1948. The biology of the water hyacinth. Ecol. Monogr. 18: 447–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. R., 1983. Fate of nitrogen and phosphorus in a wastewater retention reservoir containing aquatic macrophytes. J. Envir. Qual. 12: 137–141.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. R. & W. F. DeBusk, 1984. Growth characteristics of aquatic macrophytes cultured in nutrient enriched water: I. Water hyacinth, water lettuce and pennywort. Econ. Bot. 38: 229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. R. & W. F. DeBusk, 1985. Nutrient removal potential of selected aquatic macrophytes. J. Envir. Qual. 14: 459–462.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. R. & J. C. Tucker, 1983. Growth and nutrient uptake of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes [Mart.] Solms): I. Effect of nitrogen source. Econ. Bot. 37: 236–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. S. & T. A. DeBusk, 1981. Seasonal growth of Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms: relationship to protein, fiber, and available carbohydrate content. Aquat. Bot. 11: 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeBusk, T.A., Dierberg, F.E. Effects of nutrient availability on water hyacinth standing crop and detritus deposition. Hydrobiologia 174, 151–159 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00014062

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00014062

Key words

Navigation