Skip to main content
Log in

Fish predation on epiphytic microcrustacea in Tivoli South Bay, a Hudson River tidal freshwater wetland

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The littoral microcrustacean fauna of Tivoli South Bay was studied from July to September, 1989. The effects of fish predation on microcrustacean densities were tested in a short-term predator exclusion experiment. Fish were excluded from water chestnut (Trapa natans) plots in four screened exclosures. An equal number of open cages allowed foraging. Fish predation did not have a significant effect on densities of ostracods or other microcrustaceans. Ostracod densities increased in cages throughout the experimental period, whereas cladoceran and copepod densities decreased in both treatments. Gut contents analysis of banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus) revealed that ostracods and other microcrustaceans were commonly ingested by larval, juvenile, and adult killifish utilizing T. natans as habitat. These results suggest that ostracods and other microcrustacean epifauna associated with T. natans may represent an important trophic link in the tidal freshwater wetlands of the Hudson River Estuary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, R. M. & R. J. Wootton, 1984. Temporal patterns in diet and rate of food consumption of the threespined stickleback (Gasterosreus aculeatus L.) in Lyn Frongoch, and upland Welsh Lake. Freshwat. Biol 14: 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S. D., S. J. Walde & B. L. Peckarsky, 1990. Prey exchange rates and the impact of predators on prey populations in streams. Ecology 71: 1503–1514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyr, H. & J. A. Downing, 1988a. The abundance of phytophilous invertebrates on different species of submerged macrophytes. Freshwat. Biol. 20: 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyr, H. & J. A. Downing, 1988b. Empirical relationship of phytomacrofaunal abundance to plant biomass and macrophyte bed characteristics. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 45: 976–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, M. J. & B. C. Coull, 1989. Fish predation on meiobenthos: field experiments with juvenile spot Leiostomus xanthurus Lacepede. J. exp. mar Biol. Ecol. 130: 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairchild, C. W., 1982. Population responses of plant-associated invertebrates to foraging by largemouth bass fry (Micropterus salmoides). Hydrobiologia 96: 169–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, E., 1944. Studies on the seasonal life history of three species of freshwater ostracoda. Am. Mid. Nat. 32: 713–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, S., K. Schoeberl & B. Wagner, 1989. Abundance, composition, and dynamics of the invertebrate fauna of a tidal freshwater wetland. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 8: 140–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frid, C. L. J & R. James, 1988. The role of epibenthic predators in structuring the marine invertebrate community of a British coastal salt marsh. Netherl. J. Sea Res. 22: 307–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerking, S. D., 1962. Production and food utilization in a population of bluegill sunfish. Ecol. Monog. 33: 32–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrish, N & J. M. Bristow, 1979. Macroinvertebrate associations with aquatic macrophytes and artificial substrates. J. Great Lakes Res. 5: 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulden, C. E., 1971. Environmental control of the abundance and distribution of the chydorid cladocera. Limnol. Oceanogr. 16: 320–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, C. C., 1942. The ostracoda of Illinois, their biology and taxonomy. Illinois Biol. Monog. 19: 1–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A. F., N. K. Mountford, M. H. Heigel, K. R. Kaumeyer & J. A. Mihursky, 1980. Influence of predation on infaunal abundance in upper Chesapeake Bay, USA. Mar. Biol. 57: 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulberg, L. W.I & J. S. Oliver, 1980. Caging manipulations in marine soft-bottom communities: importance of animal interactions or sedimentary habitat modifications. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 37: 1130–1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, A. A. & S. B. Weisberg, 1986. The effects of predation by the mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus (L.), on the abundance and distribution of the salt marsh snail, Melampus bidentatus (Say). J. Exp. mar. Biol. 100: 295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keast, A., 1984. The introduced aquatic macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum, as habitat for fish and their invertebrate prey. Can. J. Zool. 62: 1289–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, B. M. S. & R. J. Livingston, 1982. Seasonal fluctuations of benthic macrofauna in the Apalachicola Estuary, Florida, USA: The role of predation. Mar. Biol. 69: 207–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIvor, C. C. & W. E. Odum, 1988. Food, predation risk, and microhabitat selection in a marsh fish assemblage. Ecology 69: 1341–1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittlebach, G. G., 1988. Competition among refuging sunfishes and effects of fish density on littoral zone invertebrates. Ecology 69: 614–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, P. J., 1984. The impact of fish exclusion on the abundance and species composition of larval odonates: Results of short-term experiments in a North Carolina farm pond. Ecology 65: 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. L., 1966. Fundamentals of Experimental Design. Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston, 407 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, W. E., T. J. Smith III, J. K. Hoover & C. C. Mclvor, 1984. The ecology of tidal freshwater marshes of the United States east coast: a community profile. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. FWS/OBS-83/17. 177 p.

  • Pennak, R. W., 1989. Freshwater Invertebrates of the United States, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 628 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reise, K. W., 1979. Moderate predation on meiofauna by the macrobenthos of the Wadden Sea. Helgolander wiss. Meeresunters 32: 453–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozas, L. P. & W. E. Odum, 1987a. Fish and macrocrustacean use of submerged plant beds in tidal freshwater marsh creeks. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 38: 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozas, L. P. & W. E. Odum, 1987b. The role of submerged aquatic vegetation in influencing the abundance of nekton on contiguous tidal freshwater marshes. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 114: 289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozas, L. P. & W. E. Odum, 1988. Occupation of submerged aquatic vegetation by fishes: testing the roles of food and refuge. Oecologia 77: 101–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. & J. Rohlf, 1981. Biometry. 2nd edn. W. H. Freeman & Co. New York, 859 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tressler, W. L., 1959. Ostracoda. In W. T. Edmondson, (ed.), Fresh-water Biology, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York: 657–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinyard, G., 1979. An ostracod (Cypridopsis vidua) can reduce predation from fish by resisting digestion. Am. Midl. Nat. 102: 188–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virnstein, R. W., 1979. Predation on estuarine infauna: Response patterns of component species. Estuaries 2: 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, M. C., J. B. Williams & C. P. White, 1978. Seasonal abundance and pattern of chydorid cladocera in mud and vegetative habitats. Ecology 59: 1177–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windell, J. T., 1971. Food analysis and rate of digestion. in W. E.Y Ricker (ed.), Methods for Assessment of of Fish Production in Fresh Waters. IBP Handbook #3, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, England, 348 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Deceased

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yozzo, D.J., Odum, W.E. Fish predation on epiphytic microcrustacea in Tivoli South Bay, a Hudson River tidal freshwater wetland. Hydrobiologia 257, 37–46 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00013995

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00013995

Key words

Navigation