Skip to main content

Comparison of quantitative light microscopy techniques used in diet studies of detritus-consuming omnivores

Abstract

The assumptions and performances of three light microscope techniques for measuring the amount of detritus in the diets of omnivorous fish were compared: area estimation, volume estimation with subsequent estimation of weight, and weight difference determination. Accuracy of the area method depends on the improbable assumption that the volume or weight of detritus particles in the diet is directly proportional to particle area. Accuracy of the difference determination is limited by the accumulation of measurement errors associated with each component of the calculation. Direct estimation of volume with subsequent conversion to ash free dry weight requires the fewest assumptions and offers greatest accuracy. Precision was greatest for the volume estimation technique and lowest for the difference determination. Time required per sample can be substantially reduced by using a digitizer for measurement and a microcomputer for calculations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Ahlgren, M. O., 1990. Diet selection and the contribution of detritus to the diet of the juvenile sucker Catostomus commersoni. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 47: 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakken, L. R. & R. A. Olsen, 1983. Buoyant density and dry-matter contents of microorganisms: conversion of a measured biovolume into biomass. Appl. envir. Microbiol. 45: 1185–1195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, S. H., 1979. A nutritional constraint in detritivory by fishes: the stunted population of Sarotherodon mossambicus (Peters) in Lake Sibaya. Ecol. Monogr. 49: 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, S. H., 1983. Quantitative description of the diet. In L. A. Nielson & D. L. Johnson (eds). Fisheries Techniques. Am. Fish. Soc. Bethesda, MD: 325–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, W. J., 1980. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. 2nd edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W., 1973. Trophic relations of aquatic insects. Ann. Rev. Ent. 18: 183–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, M. A., A. Rogerson & J. Berger, 1982. Dry to wet weight biomass conversion constant for Tetrahymena elliotti (Ciliophora, Protozoa). Oecologia 55: 145–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krambeck, C., H. Krambeck & J. Overbeck, 1981. Microcomputer-assisted biomass determination of plankton bacteria on scanning electron micrographs. Appl. envir. Microbiol. 42: 142–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, V. P. & D. S. Peters, 1984. Menhaden — a single step from vascular plant to fishery harvest. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 84: 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, J. G. W., C. Kipling & E. D. Le Cren, 1958. The inverted microscope method of estimating algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimations by counting. Hydrobiologia 11: 143–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalewajko, C., 1966. Dry weight, ash, and volume data for some freshwater planktonic algae. J. Fish. Res. bd Can. 23: 1285–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff, J. C. & R. R. Hopcroft, 1986. High precision microcomputer based measuring system for ecological research. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43: 2044–2048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprules, W. G. & L. B. Holtby, 1981. A microcomputer based measuring device for biological research. Can. J. Zool. 59: 1611–1614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. B., 1975. The larval retreat and food of Arctopsyche; with phylogenetic notes on feeding adaptations in hydropsychidae larvae (Trichoptera). Ann. Ent. Soc. Am. 68: 167–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahlgren, M.O., Bowen, S.H. Comparison of quantitative light microscopy techniques used in diet studies of detritus-consuming omnivores. Hydrobiologia 239, 79–83 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012573

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012573

Key words

  • quantitative microscopy
  • diet description
  • omnivory
  • detritivory
  • Catostomidae