Skip to main content
Log in

Farm pond restoration using Chara vulgaris vegetation

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four aged Madison County, New York farm ponds were selected to see if various treatments could be used to restore the water quality. One pond was untreated and used as a control; another pond was partially drained and exposed to the drying and oxidizing effects of the air over the fall and winter; the other two ponds were drained and the accumulated sediment removed by bulldozing. In these latter two ponds, Chara vulgaris vegetation was inoculated following the restoration process. C. vulgaris growth rapidly became the dominant producer where this inoculation was accomplished in the fall of 1976, and it is expected that the other pond will also become a C. vulgaris pond in 1978 — after its oogonia have undergone the requisite winter dormancy period.

Early C. vulgaris growth was found to be associated with clear water conditions and lessened phytoplankton growth; short, bushy, light-inhibited growth by the algae stabilized the bottom against wind-caused turbidity because of its rhizoidal growth within the substrate. Pioneer C. vulgaris growth was also found to be highly productive, significantly lowering the pond's CO2 readings.

Investigators of aquatic systems are cautioned to be cognizant of the effect of epiphytic growth on successional events in such environments. Such epiphytes are surely important, if not prime, causes of the demise of various aquatic macrophytes.

The partial draining and exposing of a pond over the fall and winter did not yield significantly improved water conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Ademec, Jan. Sept. 1973. Control of aquatic vegetation in New York State. New York State Coll. of Ag. and Life Sci., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, New York. 59 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, B. J. & Bachman, R. 1974. Experimental application of Aliquat-4 and copper for control of pond weeds. Am. Water Works Assoc. J. 66 (4): 250–252.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, Claude E. 1971. The limnological role of aquatic macrophytes and their relationship to reservoir management. Reservoir Fisheries and Limnol., Spec. Pub. No. 8: 153–166.

  • Barr, James E. & Huner, Jay V. Summer 1977. Predaceous arthopods: a problem in your pond? Farm Pond Harvest 11 (3): 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, Shirley A. 1977. Chemical, physical, and biological changes associated with Chara succession in farm ponds. Hydrobiologia 55 (3): 209–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, William. 1948. Growth of plants. Reinhold Publ. Co., New York. 459 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg, Curt. 1965. Environmental conditions for Swedish charophytes. Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses 18 (4): 5–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Myron. Nov. 1943. Charales, plant benefactors of fishes. The Aquarium: 117–120.

  • Goulder, R. 1969. Interactions between the rates of production of a freshwater macrophyte and phytoplankton in a pond. Oikos 20: 300–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasler, Arthur D. 1949. Demonstration of the antagonistic action of large aquatic plants on algae and rotifers. Ecology 30: 359–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henricsson, Monica. 1976. Nutritional studies of Chara globularis, Chara zeylanica, and Chara haitensis. Doctoral thesis. Uppsala Univ., Sweden. 51 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiner, Walter. 1944. Notes on the distribution and bio-ecology of characeae in Nebraska. Butler Univ. Bot. Stud. 6: 143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migula, W. 1897. Die Characeen Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz — In: L. Rabenhorst, Kryptogamen — Flora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. 5. 2 Aufl. Leipzig: 50.

  • Myers, Gary L. May 1973. Prairie pothole ecology and the feasibility of growing rainbow trout in prairie potholes. Master of Sci. Thesis. North Dakota State Univ., Nat'l Tech. Info. Serv., Springfield, Va. 91 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, John & Stevens, Verl. 1970. Using Baytex to control crayfish in ponds. The Prog. Fish-Culturist 32 (1): 58–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Charles. 1906. The characeae of North America. Bull. of the New York Bot. Gardens 4 (13): 243–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Gilbert. 1950. The freshwater algae of the United States, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 695 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twitty, Tom. April 10, 1977. Plan for quicker lake Apopka drawdown to cost $1 million extra. Sentinel Star Newspaper, Orlando, Florida: 11D.

  • Van Aller, Robert T. & Pessoney, George F. Nov. 1974. Doom to the bloom. Sea Grant. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adm. 5 (3): 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertucci, F. October 28, 1977. A preliminary investigation of the production and distribution of the aquatic macrophytes of Rat Cove, Otsego Lake. A paper presented at the Region II Biology Convocation. Biology Dept., SUNY, Oneonta, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, Jerrold H. 1974. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. 620 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crawford, S.A. Farm pond restoration using Chara vulgaris vegetation. Hydrobiologia 62, 17–31 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012559

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012559

Keywords

Navigation