Abstract
The present study aims at characterizing plant water status under field conditions on a daily basis, in order to improve operational predictions of plant water stress. Ohm's law analog serves as a basis for establishing daily soil-plant relationships, using experimental data from a water-limited soybean crop: 227-1. The daily transpiration flux, T, is estimated from experimental evapotranspiration data and simulated soil evaporation values. The difference, 227-2, named the effective potential gradient, is derived from i) the midday leaf potential of the uppermost expanded leaves and ii) an effective soil potential accounting for soil potential profile and an effectiveness factor of roots competing for water uptake. This factor is experimentally estimated from field observation of roots. G is an apparent hydraulic conductance of water flow from the soil to the leaves. The value of the lower potential limit for water extraction, required to assess the effective soil potential, is calculated with respect to the plant using the predawn leaf potential. It is found to be equal to −1.2 MPa. It appears that over the range of soil and climatic conditions experienced, the daily effective potential gradient remains constant (1.2 MPa), implying that, on a daily basis, transpiration only depends on the hydraulic conductance. The authors explain this behaviour by diurnal variation of osmotic potential, relying on Morgan's theory (1984). Possible generalization of the results to other crop species is suggested, providing a framework for reasoning plant water behaviour at a daily time step.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alaerts M, Badji and Feyen J 1985 Comparing the performance of root-water uptake models. Soil Sci. 139, 289–296.
Aston M J and Lawlor D W 1979 The relationship between transpiration root water uptake and leaf water potential. J. Exp. Bot. 30, 169–181.
Baier W 1969 Concepts of soil moisture availability and their effect on soil moisture estimates from a meteorological budget. Agric. Meteorol. 6, 165–178.
Boyer J S 1970 Differing sensitivity of photosynthesis to low leaf water potentials in corn and soyabean. Plant Physiol. 46, 236–239.
Brisson N 1989 Modèle de simulation de la culture du soja et de son fonctionnement hydrique. Estimation agrométéorologiques des potentialités de production. Thesis Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon, F. 90 p.
Brisson N and Perrier A 1991 A semi-empirical model of bare soil evaporation for crop simulation models. Water Resources Res. 27, 719–727.
Brisson N, Seguin B and Bertuzzi P 1992 Agrometeorological soil water balance for crop simulation models. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 59, 267–287.
Carlson T N and Lynn B 1991 The effects of plant water storage on transpiration and radiometric surface temperature. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 57, 171–185.
Chanzy A 1991 Modélisation simplifiée de l'évaporation d'un sol nu utilisant l'humidité et la température de surface accessibles par télédétection. Thesis Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon, F. 221 p.
Choisnel E 1992 Le calcul du bilan hydrique du sol: options de modélisation et niveaux de complexité. Sci. Sol 30, 15–31.
Chopart J L and VauclinM 1990 Water Balance Estimation Model-Field Test and Sensitivity Analysis. Soil Sci. Am. 54, 1377–1384.
Cowan I R 1965 Transport of water in the soil-plant atmosphere system. J. Appl. Ecol. 2, 221–239.
Dennis Jr J E and Woods D J 1987 In New computing environments: microcomputers in large-scale computing. Ed A Wouk. pp 11.6–122. SIAM.
Djekoun A and Planchon C 1992 Stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and acetylene reduction rate in soybean genotypes. Can. J. Plant Sci. 72, 383–390.
Efron B 1983 Estimating the error rate of a prediction rule: improvement on cross validation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 78, 316–331.
Ehlers W, Hamblin A P, Tennant D and Van der ploeg R R 1991 Root System Parameters Determining Water Uptake of Field Crops. Irrigation Sci. 12, 115–124.
Fernandez C J and McCree K J 1991 Simulation model for studying dynamics of water flow and water status in plants. Crop Sci. 31, 391–398.
Frederick J R, Woolley J T, Hesketh J D and Peters D B 1990 Water Deficit Development in Old and New Soybean Cultivars. Agron. J. 82, 76–81.
Gardner W R 1960 Dynamic aspects of water availability to plants. Soil Sci. 89, 63–73.
Girma F S and Krieg D R 1992 Osmotic Adjustment in Sorghum 1. Mechanisms of Diurnal Osmotic Potential Changes. Plant Physiol. 99, 577–582.
Habib R, Pages L, Jordon M O, Simonneau T and Sebillotte M 1991 Water and mineral uptake by the root system of plants with special regard to modelling absorption by the roots. Agronomie 11, 623–643.
Hirasawa T and Ishihara K 1991 On resistance to water transport in crop plants for estimating water uptake ability under intense transpiration. Japan. J. Crop Sci. 60, 174–183.
Jones J W, Zur B, Boote K J and Hammond L C 1982 Plant resistance to water flow in field soybeans: I Non-limiting soil moisture. Agron. J. 74, 92–98.
Jones M M 1978 Modelling diurnal trends of leaf water potential in transpiring wheat. J. Appl. Ecol. 15, 613–626.
Katerji N, Hallaire M, Perrier A and Durand D 1983 Transfers hydriques dans le végétal. I. Modélisation à l'échelle du couvert végétal en conditions naturelles. Acta oecol. Oecol. Plant. 4, 11–26.
Kirkham M B 1988 Hydraulic resistance of two sorghums varying in drought resistance. Plant and Soil 105, 19–24.
Kowalick P J and Turner N C 1983 Diurnal changes in the water relations and transpiration of a soybean crop simulated during the development of water deficit. Irrig. Sci. 4, 225–238.
Lafolie F, Bruckler L and Tardieu F 1991 Modelling root water potential and soil root water transport. 1. Model presentation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 55, 1203–1212.
Lawn R J 1982 Response of four grain legumes to water stress in South-Eastern Queensland. II Plant and growth and soil water extraction patterns. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 33, 497–509.
Mishio M and Yokoi Y 1991 A model for estimation of water flow resistance in soil-leaf pathway under dynamic conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 42, 541–546.
Molz F J 1981 Models of water transport in the soil-plant system-A review, Water Resources Res. 17, 1245–1260.
Morgan J M 1983 Osmoregulation as a selection criterion for drought in wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 34, 607–614.
Morgan J M 1984 Osmoregulation and water stress in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35, 299–319.
Morgan J M 1992 Adaptation to water deficits in three grain legume species mechanisms of turgor maintenance. Field Crops Res. 29, 91–106.
Morgan J M, Hare R A and Fletcher R J 1986 Genetic variation in osmoregulation in bread and durum wheats and its relationship to grain yield in a range of field environments. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 37, 449–457.
Mukherjee D and Kottejoda N 1992 Stochastic model for soil moisture deficit in irrigated lands. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng.-ASCE. 118, 527–542.
Munns R 1988 Why measure osmotic adjustment. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 15, 717–726.
Nobel P S 1983 Biophysical Plant Physiology and Ecology. W H Freeman and Co., San Francisco, USA. 000 p.
Olioso A 1992 Simulation des échanges d'énergie et de masse d'un couvert végétal dans le but de relier la transpiration et la photosynthèse aux mesures de réflectance et de température de surface. Thesis Université Montpellier II, F. 254 p.
Reicosky D C and Heatherly LG1990 Soybean. In Irrigation of Agricultural Crops. Eds. B A Stewart and D R Nielson, Agron. 30, 639–674.
Reid J B and Huck M G 1990 Diurnal variation of crop hydraulic resistance — A new analysis. Agron. J. 82, 827–834.
Ritchie J T 1981 Soil water availability. Plant and Soil 58, 327–338.
Sobrado M A 1990 Drought responses of tropical corn. 2. Leaf expansion rate and water relations under controlled conditions. Maydica 35, 227–234.
Tardieu F 1988 Analysis of the spatial variability of maize root density. II. Distances between roots. Plant and Soil 107, 267–272.
Tardieu F, Bruckler L and Lafolie F 1992 Root clumping may affect the root water potential and the resistance to soil-root transport. Plant and Soil 140, 291–301.
Taylor H M and Klepper B 1975 Water uptake by cotton root systems: an examination of assumptions in the single root model. Soil Sci. 120, 57–67.
Turner N C, Begg J E, Rawson H M, English S D and Hearn A B 1978 Agronomic and physiological responses of soybean and sorghum crops to water deficits. III Components of leaf water potential leaf conductance co2 photosynthesis and adaptation to water deficits. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 5, 179–194.
Van den Honert T H 1948 Water transport as a catenary process. Faraday Society Discussion 3, 146–153.
Van Bavel C H M and Ahmed J 1976 Dynamic simulation of water depletion in the root zone. Ecol. Modelling 2, 189–212.
Van Genuchten M T 1980 A close form eq. for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 44, 892–898.
Veihmeyer F J and Hendrickson A H 1927 Soil-moisture conditions in relation to plant growth. Plant Physiol. 2, 71–78.
Wright G C, Smith R C G and Morgan J M 1983 Differences between two grain sorghum genotypes in adaptation to drought stress. III. Physiological responses. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 34, 637–651.
Zur B, Jones J W, Boote K J and Hammond L C 1982 Total resistance to water flow in field soybeans. II Limiting soil moisture. Agron. J. 74, 99–105.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brisson, N., Olioso, A. & Clastre, P. Daily transpiration of field soybeans as related to hydraulic conductance, root distribution, soil potential and midday leaf potential. Plant Soil 154, 227–237 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012528
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012528