Abstract
The use of crack growth resistance curves (R−Δa) to predict the behaviour of cracked specimens is a well established practice for ceramic and cementitious materials. When the cohesive crack model can be applied to these materials it is shown that the use of R−Δa curves is equivalent to setting up an elastic equivalence that greatly simplifies the computations. This equivalence has its drawbacks and limitations. This paper analyzes a class of equivalences—the load (P) versus another variable—between cracked cohesive materials and linear elastic ones, ascertaining its applicability to the interpretations of fracture data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Z.P. Bazant (ed.), Mechanics of Geomaterials: Rocks, Concrete, Soils, J. Wiley and Sons (1985).
S.P. Shah, S.E. Swartz and M.L. Wang (eds.), Micromechanics of Failure of Quasi-Brittle Materials, Elsevier Publishers (1990).
H. Mihashi, H. Takahashi and F.H. Wittmann (eds.), Fracture Toughness and Fracture Energy, A.A. Balkema (1989).
M. Elices and J. Planas, in Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures, L. Elfgren, (ed.) Chapman and Hall (1989) 16–66, Chapter 3.
J. Planas and M. Elices, International Journal of Fracture 51 (1991) 139–157.
J. Planas and M. Elices, Inernational Journal of Fracture 55 No. 2 (1992) 153–177.
J. Planas, G. Guinea and M. Elices, Journal of Materials & Structures, submitted.
H. Tada, P. Paris and G. Irwin, The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, Del Research Corp. (1985).
J. Rice, in Fracture, Vol. 2, H. Liebowitz (ed.), Academic Press (1968) 192–311.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elices, M., Planas, J. The equivalent elastic crack: 1. Load-Y equivalences. Int J Fract 61, 159–172 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012455
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012455