Skip to main content
Log in

Increasing salinity tolerance of grain crops: Is it worthwhile?

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The productivity of wheat and barley was compared in soils of different salt concentrations with a limited water supply. Productivity was assessed as total dry weight or dry weight per unit of water used (water use efficiency, WUE). Barley achieved the highest productivity because it used more of the available water and it had a greater WUE for above-ground dry weight. However, when WUE for total organic weight of roots and shoots was determined, or WUE was corrected for grain production, wheat and barley had the same productivity. In two experiments in drying soils with different salt concentrations but the same amount of soil water, wheat and barley had a higher dry weight than salt-tolerant grasses and they were more productive than C4 halophytes and non-halophytes when adjusted for water use. In one experiment, sown at a low plant density, barley and wheat used less water than some halophytes and they completed their life cycle leaving some water behind in the soil. Their higher WUE did not compensate for their lower water use. However, when all species were sown at a high density, wheat and barley were either as productive or more productive than the most salt-tolerant species, including a C4 halophyte, as they used all the available water and had the highest WUE. A sunflower cultivar was similary more productive than a salt-tolerant relative. The contribution that salt-tolerant relatives of wheat, barley and sunflower can make to genetically improving the productivity of these species in dry saline soils is questioned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blum A, Mayer J and Goland G 1988 The effect of grain number per ear (sink size) on source activity and its water-relations in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 39, 106–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugnoli E and Lauteri M 1991 Effects of salinity on stomatal conductance, photosynthetic capacity, and carbon isotope discrimination of salt-tolerant (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and salt-sensitive (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) C3 non-halophytes. Plant Physiol. 95, 628–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar G D and Richards R A 1984 Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water use efficiency of wheat genotypes. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 11, 539–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster B P, Phillips M S, Miller T E, Baird E and Powell W 1990 Chromosome locations of genes controlling tolerance of salt (NaCl) and vigour in Hordeum vulgare and H. chilense. Heredity 65, 99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorham J 1990 Salt tolerance in Triticeae: K/Na discrimination in Aegilops species. J. Exp. Bot. 41, 615–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy R D, Warne P G and Reid D M 1988 Stable carbon isotope ratio as an index of water-use efficiency in C3 halophytes—possible relationship to strategies for osmotic adjustment. In Stable Isotopes in Ecological Research. Eds. P W Rundel, J R Ehleringer and K A Nagy. pp 55–75. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsbury R W and Epstein E 1984 Selection for salt resistant spring wheat. Crop Sci. 24, 310–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCree K J 1986 Whole-plant carbon balance during osmotic adjustment to drought and salinity stress. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13, 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCree K J and Richardson S G 1987 Salt increases the water use efficiency in water stressed plants. Crop Sci. 27, 543–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire P E and Dvorak J 1981 High salt-tolerance potential in wheatgrasses. Crop Sci. 21, 702–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan J M 1983 Osmoregulation as a selection criterion for drough tolerance in wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 34, 607–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearcy R W and Ehleringer J R 1984 Comparative ecophysiology of C3 and C4 plants. Plant Cell Environ. 7, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson H M 1986 Gas exchange and growth in wheat and barley grown in salt. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13, 475–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson H M, Begg J E and Woodward R G 1977 The effect of atmospheric humidity on photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency of leaves of several plant species. Planta 134, 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson H M, Richards R A and Munns R 1988 An examination of selection criteria for salt tolerance in wheat, barley and triticale. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 39, 759–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards R A 1983 Should selection for yield in saline regions be made on saline or non-saline soils? Euphytica 32, 431–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards R A, Dennet C W, Qualset C O, Epstein E, Norlyn J D and Winslow M D 1987. Variation in yield of grain and biomass in wheat, barley and triticale in a salt-affected field. Field Crops Res. 15, 227–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter E and Läuchli A 1982 Salt tolerance of Trifolium alexandrinum L. I. Comparison of salt response of T. alexandrinum and T pratense. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 9, 221–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo A R 1983 Salinity resistance: Physiologies and prices. Physiol. Plant. 58, 214–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo A R and Flowers T J 1986 Salinity resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and a pyramiding approach to breeding varieties for saline soils. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13, 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richards, R.A. Increasing salinity tolerance of grain crops: Is it worthwhile?. Plant Soil 146, 89–98 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012000

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012000

Key words

Navigation